Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Uploaded
Feb 23, 2007 | 6:51 PM EST
  • Daily Feature February 24, 2007

Related Stuff

If you liked this, check these out!


Author Comments

*v1.5.1*
game has been updated to address difficulty issues people are having.

*Thanks for the front page Tom !!*

-* READ THE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PLAYING *-
-* USE THE MODIFY BUTTON TO INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF INFECTING COUNTRIES AND AIRPOTS ETC *-

Pandemic: Extinction of man is a "spin-off" of Pandemic! The game features brand new gameplay and features. Please read the in-game instructions if this is your first time playing. Special thanks to Crazy Monkey Games for sponsorship!

Reviews


TimTheEnchanterTimTheEnchanter

Rated 2.5 / 5 stars February 25, 2007

Kinda Frustrating

So much of the game is based on chance that some very irritating things can happen, such as the one percent of population you have infected dying on the first turn of mankind, or a country going from 3/5 to full cure in 2 turns. Better weighting to the random rolls and a bit more in the upper and lower bounds of the chances of events happening would make this much better. Way to often would I spend 8 points on spreading an infection with no result, only to have 3 pts in a row all successfully spread infection.

Also, the later upgrades to the virus seem way to expensive. The player needs to be presented with an interesting choice, but the cost of the upgrades means most players won't get them because they have to spend points to spread the infection or fight a potential cure, or risk all of their victims dying off.

All in all, I did like the additional control the player had over the way the virus spread, just that some of the mechanics need to be tightened.


People find this review helpful!

robrorobro

Rated 4 / 5 stars February 25, 2007

good but

the cure development began and continued way to fast
maybe adding a difficulty choice?



Fah-KrakahFah-Krakah

Rated 2 / 5 stars February 25, 2007

Mix with first one and learn from mistakes. Fair.

The first game had a little more interactivity and was a little more fun. This game is just left too much up to chance. I also think it was a little too soon after the first. Maybe put them together and take your time on the third and I promise I'll look foward to it!



ForcedDjForcedDj

Rated 2.5 / 5 stars February 25, 2007

Not bad/good

Graphics: 10/10
Style: Still great, 10/10
Sound: Music is great, 10/10
Violence: None, 0/10
Interactivity: Ok, this is where it fails at. The first one was good, but this one failed the first one. For one thing, countries can get the cure in maybe 10-20 days. You could lose your virus on the 2nd day? Also, you have to use the plane to get to some regions, but it goes to an infected region/the same region.
Humor: none, 0/10
Overall: 5/10 or 3/5.
Suggestions: Make it strategy and don't let airports go to the same country.



DuckfootedDuckfooted

Rated 3 / 5 stars February 25, 2007

Not as good as the original

I found it to be more difficult than it's predecessor, and not nearly as fun or interactive with the lack of options as to infection type. The script wasn't on par with the game itself, and drew quality away from what there was to begin with. Not terrible, but not something I'd play again. A decent attempt as a whole.