Score: 5

"good for a newbie"

by: DeejSurlent

date: November 28, 2007

perfect music tbh. GB is always a safe bet with me.
The wand game isn't hard in a challenging way its hard in the 'if i can sit around all day and learn the pattern this would be really easy' way.
The gun game is better.
Overall pretty good, give us a version two when you are more experienced.
Some more original enemies would be good, maybe a special attack, the second version could have anything you wan't. Remember that if you are making it you can make anything you want in it.
Good luck, i'd like to see you develop as an artist.

Score: 3

"Fairly dull."

by: JNels

date: February 12, 2007

Well, this was far from the worst thing I've seen on Newgrounds, but it wasn't very good either. First off, the graphics were truly awful, just a bunch of cut-and-paste pictures on a gray background. The music was a riff on the James Bond title theme and it wasn't all that hot either; the gunfire noise also drove me to the brink of sanity. Still, this game has a great idea, blamming entries to the Newgrounds portal while protecting the good ones, pity it didn't use it properly. Technically, two games should be better than one, right? Wrong, when both games are turkeys like this it's much better to find something more entertaining to do with your time, like watching paint dry. Sorry if these comments sound harsh, it's just that there is not much to this game. Play it at your own risk.

Score: 8

"two great games in one"

by: BlackPlastic

date: July 27, 2006

THE GOOD

Two games in one game is a great idea because if one fails then people still may like the other one. I liked the comments you get if something bad or mildly bad gets in the portal. The games were not too hard but not too easy.

THE BAD

The wand game always screwed up somewhere along the line. The graphics were pretty bad too.

IMPROVEMENTS

Fix the glitches in the wand game. And improve the graphics.

Score: 3

"The other one was better"

by: Benk

date: May 7, 2006

This wasn't fun to play, neither were your other games. The other portal game was a lot better

Score: 3

"Front page"

by: Midsnacker

date: May 7, 2006

Yeah i read your comment about the similar game on the front page.... and wow you suck. graphics were lame, game play was lame, that guy made it to the front page because he worked hard to make some smooth animation. any ways you didn't need to yell at that guy in the first place. it's not like he was suppose to know that you made this game. it's not his fault new grounds put him on the front page.