Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Feb 8, 2006 | 12:27 PM EST
  • Daily Feature February 9, 2006

Related Stuff

If you liked this, check these out!

Plenty more like this here!

  • Birds
    Birds You'll be flapping with joy after watching these!

Author Comments

An animation that answers the age old question of what came first.



Rated 3 / 5 stars February 12, 2006

i thought this was commen knowledge?!?!?

i honestly already knew this! it was funny but the 0.000... got really anoying really fast. good other wise though


Rated 3 / 5 stars February 9, 2006

Yeah well

Everything was going good until there were to many nots and I wanted to turn it off. Repetition is a valuable comic tool when harnessed properly. This time it wasn't funny.


Rated 3 / 5 stars February 12, 2006

Either way...

This short was funny... for the first 10 seconds. Then you threw in a political agenda and I stopped caring. I'm glad you guys have nothing better to do with your time than sit about, making thinly-veiled jabs at the American Presidency. I don't even care which side it's for... it just wasn't necessary and it ruined the short a fair amount.

whataboffin responds:

No political agenda really just Bush jokes are funny.


Rated 3 / 5 stars February 12, 2006


Great flash... i love these science things but staples raises a good point... whos egg is it the sub-chickens or the first chickens?? i think the chicken but... TO THE FORUMS"


Rated 3 / 5 stars February 8, 2006


Evolution is an unconfirmed hypothesis, therefor it is not scientifically acceptable. Which means the chicken was made first to birth the egg of the chicken. Also, British people are weird and say not instead of zero like regular humans.

whataboffin responds:

Actually we say "Naught" not "not" and I would like to remind you that the American Language was originally English.