Be a Supporter!

Credits & Info

Uploaded
Aug 23, 2004 | 11:14 AM EDT

Related Stuff

If you liked this, check these out!


Author Comments

WATCH!!!

Reviews


SlothGearRexSlothGearRex

Rated 1.5 / 5 stars August 24, 2004

Not my thing

I'm sorry, but I did not find this cartoon to be funny at all. Maybe if you threw Steven Hawking in there, then I'd give a chuckle. You already had the robot voice. But anyways, there was no real animation that went into this, and there wasn't any pay-off. To sum it up: It hurt my head.



M-A-R-C-U-SM-A-R-C-U-S

Rated 1 / 5 stars August 24, 2004

pointless

there was just nothing in it to keep me interested.
the graphics were shocking, as the background was a picture, and there were only a few clocks in the whole thing.
animation - nearly wasnt there at all, only a few subtle movements in the whole movie.
sounds were shocking. i dont like clock voices in general, but these were beyond crap, the quality was terrible low.
overall, really bad. just... really, really bad.
overall score: 2/10
(THE THUMB: DOWN!!!!)



Redneck-ClockRedneck-Clock

Rated 5 / 5 stars August 23, 2004

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Where did the subtitles go. Nice job, lol

Keep up the good work!!



TsiphonTsiphon

Rated 2 / 5 stars August 23, 2004

Uhhh...

It was ok. The funniest part was when the subtitles messed up and it said something like "Subtitles can go away now" (i didnt get but 1 second to read it...impling everything after Subtitles. Other than that ok i guess. Dont seem to hard to put a clock dial on a picture of a cigarette and a digi clock on a tv (ect.) and add computer generated voice with the background out of a picture. Just my 2 cents.



AzumiAzumi

Rated 2 / 5 stars August 23, 2004

:(

That was ok , you have abilities as an artist but you just aren't using them to their full potential. Try harder!