Score: 10

"whoa"

by: jake3rings

date: February 15, 2005

alrite so i followed ur advice mr. lambi... this one was twisted like #4.... no blood but tons of violence... i only gave it a 5 in the V department cuz there was no blood and gore... what do u use to make these? can i pick one up at best buy? this cartoon rocked... the sound was actually really good... on to #2

Score: 8

"Sound is painful, but the graphics make up for it."

by: CountCrazy007

date: February 5, 2005

Lambi 1 is a cute cartoon about people in a bomberman-esque world.

The graphics are easily the best part of the animation, being very unique and really grabs your attention. The graphics complement the style of the animation, going for that cute innocent look rather than the overdone "badass" look. The unique direction the creator went with style certainly makes it stand out.

If it had a downfall, it'd definately be sound. Being out of sync and almost painful to listen to, it's the only reason I could see for someone to not like it. Although it may seem a little slowpaced, that contributes more to the style and makes Lambi 1 feel unique.

In the end, Lambi 1 isn't amazing by far, but interesting enough to arouse your interest to watch the superior later installments into the series.

Score: 9

"DUDE. great work"

by: clown-hater

date: July 2, 2004

i just watched all your flash and im surprised i havnt heard of you before. your a really great artist. your use of 3-d animation and textures, combined with the soft music and colours really bring your stories to life. you should really make a name of yourself and start submitting awsome flashes like these ones. you could be really well known with your skills. like knox and fablous 999 and maybe with a few months you could be like legendary frog!!

Score: 9

"Very... cute."

by: LordYikko

date: July 1, 2004

That was extremely good, and I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more publicity. One major problem though:

Speed up the framerate!

Score: 10

"very decent"

by: infernal-psycho

date: June 25, 2004

but i didnt understand it