Score: 8

"Nice work."

by: onerandomperson

date: July 6, 2004

I follow the school of thought that a movie is good if it is good, not because it is sticks or madness clone, or matrix or dbz rip-offs/tributes. This movie is good. I can see that you put a lot of work into it. The detail on the weapons was enough. Not too much to take in, but not simple block-drawings.
However, as with almost all good and great movies, there are a few things that could be improved. For example, you have sfx for firing the gun, but none for loading/cocking. Also, the angle of the backs is fine for standing or walking leisurely, but the faster people walk/run/charge, the shallower the back. Another point on the movement of the characters is although the forward motion of the legs is fine; the legs also need to move backwards. If you are not sure what I mean, try watching a friend walk/run. Even better would be to video the friend with a digital camera/camcorder, and study it using frame-by-frame.
Despite the inevitable points that need improving, this is a good movie, although I personally prefer the “prequel” to this one.

Score: 9

"This sucks as much as something without a mouth."

by: ssjvegit0

date: March 30, 2004

The only thing good about this was the story, sound and graphics. Other than that it was pure unadulturated bull-good.

Score: 6

"not bad"

by: cask

date: March 29, 2004

not bad should of finished it.

Score: 8

"4"

by: bumcheekcity

date: March 29, 2004

Sweet. You aren't kidding about the keyframes bit, you must have had hundreds of them" Nice work.

Score: 6

"hhmmmm.."

by: sk8erboy2003

date: March 29, 2004

not bad but not good either the movement was a bit weird but not crap. it kinda reminded me of joe zombie which made it good