Pupkin by Pupkin



Author & File Information


Submitted: 10/27/2003 | 10:00PM EST

File Info: Movie | 777.1 KB | Add Movie to Favorites

Current Score: 3.36 / 5.00

560 votes | 8,657 views

Click an icon to vote on this!

You are not logged in.


Related Submissions

Submissions by Bobby Crosby (Pupkin):


Author Comments

The first (and probably only) cartoon based on the comic strip "Pupkin." This episode is about when Pupkin met Snagglefood and the Snaggles, which was one of the more popular storylines. I'll possibly make more episodes if this gets a good response (it won't!).

23 reviews | Log in to write a review | Share this!

The people have spoken

Average Score: 6.4 / 10

Score: 8
Zandor12

"Wow"

date: March 7, 2005

I've heard nothing but bad things about Pupkin, but I was bored and desperate to procrastinate from homework so I delved into your archives and was surprised. This, both the comics and this flash, are possibly the strangest things I have ever seen. Your mind has tapped into a vein of pure, concentrated nonsense. I mean that in a good way, though; I like weird humor, and this is VERY weird. "ALL HAIL JESUS!" is one of the best lines I've ever heard. You are a disturbingly creative person, and it's a shame that you ended the first Pupkin series mid-plot-arc to eventually start that terrible Non-Identical Triplet thing.

Good luck with the new Pupkin series.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 10
Tettsui

"Great Movie !!!"

date: March 15, 2004

Pupkin is a great chance for a good story. Go on with your work. Of course I can't tell what you want to say with this movie, but the people that critizise it just aren't able to understand that deeper meaning is behind your work.

Please go on !!!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!

Score: 8
Kamicollo-sama

"w007"

date: January 7, 2004

Pupkin rules. Like Marduk

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People aren't in agreement over whether this is helpful or not.

Score: 1
Lord-Crimson

"Why on Earth was this made?"

date: December 21, 2003

This hurts to watch. The animation itself is pretty decent, but the sound is awful, and the random crap story meanders aimlessly. This is not good entertainment, people.
Who is this suppose to appeal to? It's got kintergarden-level storytelling, but there's material here (blood) that would make it inappropriate for children.
You know what this reminds me of? The "Porch Pals" Itchy and Scratchy cartoon. The dialogue is equally as inane and pointless, only the Itchy and Scratchy cartoon was done in the name of satire. This is drivvel.
Anyone who calls this entertainment is either being dishonest or needs a healthy dose of maturity. Do yourself a favor and heed my word. For the love of god, don't watch this.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 1
Zoronocool

"And god wept in fear of bad internet comics"

date: December 18, 2003

I continue to be baffled by this Pupkin phenominon. It seems to be the worse, least creative web comic of all time, and yet people still like it. One's man review said that you must understand surrealism to get pupkin. I'll accept that this is surreal to say the least, but at the same time it's moronic (and certainly not in the good way). The plot is slow and full of random crap that is neither normal not suprisingly abnormal. Half time comics on the site are lame filler whick show 3 or so frames of pupkin facing different diriections and then blurting something out in the last frame. I'll admit I've made some bad stuff in my time and was under the delusion that it was good, but I must have been 13 at the time. What's your excuse? I've seen surreal, this is just crap.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!