Author's Response:
You do give a good amount of effort to give constructive criticism. Far more so than most reviewers. Well done for that.
Your meaning does sometimes get clouded though.
Let's take it slowly...
"Pretty bad game actually, I didn't really enjoy playing it, although it was pretty addictive at first."
Fair enough. So you got bored quickly. Is more variety the remedy? You leave the question hanging in the air like a banana peel on a ledge.
"First of all, the graphics is pretty bad, i didn't really like the graphics."
O... kay.
"The drawing which I was supossed to spot the differences in was pretty ugly and distorted, so i couldn't really soo a lot of differences."
Ah! More specific comments! That's useful! So you have a dislike to random abstract stuff!
"Also, the time bar which mesures my time has a bug and in the end it turnes points behind."
Poor grammar, but heck, I can't write any 2nd language as well as you do English.
As it happens, I did notice it and I maintain that it's Flash's fault. Still, thanks.
"Also the background of this game in general is pretty ugly. So fix the graphics, because as I see it, it is ugly."
Those 2 sentences leave me yearning for more. The background's 'ugly'? In what way? Does it look cluttered? Is it the colour? Is it maybe to do with the lack of decoration?
I don't expect you to give me every answer, but the more specific your feedback is, the more useful it becomes. To my mind anyway.
"Second of all, the style was awful!"
Again - style is a terrible word in the English language. Like 'art'. They're both rather vague terms, I feel.
"you didn't build any tension with the time or so, it was pretty simple."
In what way? Are you saying I should have had big warnings pop up saying there's "10 seconds left!" or whatever at a few points?
Again, you've left the answer unclear, which is fine - I don't expect you to do all the work after all - but it's the 2nd half of that sentence which confuses.
"...or so, it was pretty simple"
I'm just unsure what you meant by it. Language problems, I suppose. I feel kinda bad mentioning it. But I am. Because I'm a bad man. But an honest one, at least.
"Third of all, there was no sound, you must add sound to this game, because it is not good without it. A sound must be added to games like that, especially silly like this ones. Also add sound effects when you spot something."
Your sentiment is made clear.
"Fourth of all, the concept of this game was pretty silly. Finding only 5 differences is a pretty dumb idea, not to mention in this stupid drawing! It getts boring after a half a minute and I solved it in the fourth time..."
It'd maybe be nice to know why you found it boring. But really, you're giving me a lot of great info as it is there. Stats about your play experience are always interesting to hear.
"Anyway, it is a very bad game, it wasn't really fun.
>Lidov<"
Clear and concise.
Overall, your review does have a lot of great info and some things I'll take into consideration. You could be even more specific yet, and I note you failed to make one positive remark.
But overall, it was a good review.
6/10
