Tired of waiting?
Click here to disable ads!
You are not logged in. If you sign up for an account,
you can gain additional voting power over time, allowing your vote to have an even
greater impact on submission scores!
I suggest you play 'Spot the Difference' rather than this game.
This was just a test. Mainly submitted to get feedback before I continued. I didn't expect it to survive.
Thanks to Emagdnim678, TheShrike and The_Super_Flash_Bros for a useful online tutorial about how to disable the tab button.
it's only one level?
next button doesn't make nothing
you can't compare it with spot the diferences
but it was ok XD
Yeah. Just a test before I started making proper pics. I wasn't sure if folk would want a StD game!
i found it easy
it was a good game but using the magic eyes trick i found them all in about 3 seconds, the next button didn't work either, improve mabye?
Play 'spot the difference'. This was a demo.
It was allright, i would like to see tehre being more time and just load it with really small diffrences. Also u should have like lvlv, so u have like This amount of time to find say like 10 diffrences, then when that time is up it tells u how many u found then shows u were the other ones r then goes to the next lvl with maybe not be a picture of just lines. That would be really cool. also im sorry for any spelling mistaks i have like less and a min to write this b/c i need to go do a shit load of work out side! allrigth soo work man keap it going
Cheers for taking the time to do the review.
It's great to hear another person's thoughts.
Levels - I do have another game: Spot the difference. That has 10 levels. Though you only progress if you actually win each level.
Being able to progress regardless is something I shall muse upon.
5 for sound? Heh. Thanks.
You should definitely check out my 'Spot the Difference' game. I'd love to hear what you think of that!
Well you were right
Well I checked out spot the five differences first, but your author comments said come to this one. You are right with the way thigns are the otehr one is notthing compared to this one.
I would suggest some sound to go with this mabye at least a sound when you fidn somethign and another when you click on the right area.
Actually IO would have put a longer time limit on the last board. Or a limited number of guess. The way it is it is way too easy. With the time you give on most of the other boards it not too hard to find any of the difference in them with a few looks. I got the the rotating purple thigns with easy. That was probably the hardest level for me compared to the rest. Still other than one difference it wasn't too hard. That graphics could be better, the animation was ok. If you plan on do anything like this again more levels and harder.
I think you meant to review "Spot the Difference" but clicked to review "Spot 5 differences" accidentally.
I'll pretend this review was left for that other game.
I review your review:
You give more constructive criticism than ever here. Nice elaboration on suggestions re: final level.
Some useful feedback on personal experience/performance.
No specific praise, which is amazing for you. Still, a generally positive mood prevails and your review seems to focus on possible improvement rather than simply slating it as some might.
Thanks again for giving me all this feedback. Been lovely to read.
Stay healthy and alive. Stay funky and excellent.
Pretty bad game actually, I didn't really enjoy playing it, although it was pretty addictive at first.
First of all, the graphics is pretty bad, i didn't really like the graphics. The drawing which I was supossed to spot the differences in was pretty ugly and distorted, so i couldn't really soo a lot of differences. Also, the time bar which mesures my time has a bug and in the end it turnes points behind. Also the background of this game in general is pretty ugly. So fix the graphics, because as I see it, it is ugly.
Second of all, the style was awful! you didn't build any tension with the time or so, it was pretty simple. You have to add a soundtreck, because it helps the style and to build the tensioning atmosphere this game should have. So fix the style of this movie as well.
Third of all, there was no sound, you must add sound to this game, because it is not good without it. A sound must be added to games like that, especially silly like this ones. Also add sound effects when you spot something.
Fourth of all, the concept of this game was pretty silly. Finding only 5 differences is a pretty dumb idea, not to mention in this stupid drawing! It getts boring after a half a minute and I solved it in the fourth time...
Anyway, it is a very bad game, it wasn't really fun.
You do give a good amount of effort to give constructive criticism. Far more so than most reviewers. Well done for that.
Your meaning does sometimes get clouded though.
Let's take it slowly...
"Pretty bad game actually, I didn't really enjoy playing it, although it was pretty addictive at first."
Fair enough. So you got bored quickly. Is more variety the remedy? You leave the question hanging in the air like a banana peel on a ledge.
"First of all, the graphics is pretty bad, i didn't really like the graphics."
"The drawing which I was supossed to spot the differences in was pretty ugly and distorted, so i couldn't really soo a lot of differences."
Ah! More specific comments! That's useful! So you have a dislike to random abstract stuff!
"Also, the time bar which mesures my time has a bug and in the end it turnes points behind."
Poor grammar, but heck, I can't write any 2nd language as well as you do English.
As it happens, I did notice it and I maintain that it's Flash's fault. Still, thanks.
"Also the background of this game in general is pretty ugly. So fix the graphics, because as I see it, it is ugly."
Those 2 sentences leave me yearning for more. The background's 'ugly'? In what way? Does it look cluttered? Is it the colour? Is it maybe to do with the lack of decoration?
I don't expect you to give me every answer, but the more specific your feedback is, the more useful it becomes. To my mind anyway.
"Second of all, the style was awful!"
Again - style is a terrible word in the English language. Like 'art'. They're both rather vague terms, I feel.
"you didn't build any tension with the time or so, it was pretty simple."
In what way? Are you saying I should have had big warnings pop up saying there's "10 seconds left!" or whatever at a few points?
Again, you've left the answer unclear, which is fine - I don't expect you to do all the work after all - but it's the 2nd half of that sentence which confuses.
"...or so, it was pretty simple"
I'm just unsure what you meant by it. Language problems, I suppose. I feel kinda bad mentioning it. But I am. Because I'm a bad man. But an honest one, at least.
"Third of all, there was no sound, you must add sound to this game, because it is not good without it. A sound must be added to games like that, especially silly like this ones. Also add sound effects when you spot something."
Your sentiment is made clear.
"Fourth of all, the concept of this game was pretty silly. Finding only 5 differences is a pretty dumb idea, not to mention in this stupid drawing! It getts boring after a half a minute and I solved it in the fourth time..."
It'd maybe be nice to know why you found it boring. But really, you're giving me a lot of great info as it is there. Stats about your play experience are always interesting to hear.
"Anyway, it is a very bad game, it wasn't really fun.
Clear and concise.
Overall, your review does have a lot of great info and some things I'll take into consideration. You could be even more specific yet, and I note you failed to make one positive remark.
But overall, it was a good review.
Physics platformer with time-portals. One place - two times and different level geometry.
Help Chase find new love
Defend an arctic base on the frozen moon of Jupiter
newgrounds.com — Your #1 online entertainment & artist community! All your base are belong to us.