Author's Response:
Thank you for so many wonderful reviews. I'm obviously glad you enjoyed this one and it means so much coming from you - as I've seen the brilliant stuff you yourself are capable of.
review of your review
=======================
: In many cases, that type of realtion is so much more important than a mis-match between audio and visual attributes.
The above sentence is a little unclear. Did you mean to say that "that type of relationship" makes for a massive improvement?
Or by when you talk of a "mis-match" are you meaning the timing?
I understand you're... Korean? I don't know. But really, your English is great and I feel slightly bad pointing such things out. But where your meaning becomes unclear, it is a slight problem.
Also, I'm not entirely sure what 'Squigglevision' as you call intentionally wobbly gfx has to do with short attention spans...
The filesize/music quality issue: you're totally, totally right. To be honest, I'm not totally sure if I understood all the export quality options at the time. I may have been overly worried with making it bigger than necessary.
The part after the astronauts enter is my favourite too. :-)
I'm not at all sure what exactly you mean by 'supporting attributes'. I noticed you use this phrase a lot in the reviews. I'll maybe have to e-mail you regarding that.
overall:
========
constructive criticism/suggestions: 7 - Just the low quality audio.
exposition of experience: 8 - You really let me know how it made you feel. I'd have maybe liked to know whether you looked at the comments and whether you liked them or not, but that's no biggie.
praise/encouragement: 10 - Obviously easier in cases where you like the flash. But seriously, your review is great, ending on a high note, and it makes me want to animate a bit more than I did before.
clarity of expression: 6 - a few bits I didn't understand, but you do a better job than many native speakers of English.
elaboration & being specific: 10
coverage (how much): 9
overall: 9
I love the way that you focus on aspects of the 'artistry' which others don't often mention. You really seem to approach reviewing from your own angle and I really, really enjoyed reading this.
My only real complaint is the few parts that were unclear. I feel like a bit of a prick for saying that though, given that English isn't your first language.