Reviews For: Bomb Detonator

(79 Reviews • Avg: 7.00/10)

Sort by: [ date | rating ]

There are 8 pages of reviews. [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]


Score: 1
LittleLittleMonster

"Frustrating"

date: December 8, 2009

First of all, I had fun only in the first.... ten seconds. The game's got many bugs. The music is really annoying after trirty seconds playing. The car control is poor, to the point you go around the target bomb or power up and cannot reach it. Other, a car cannot make an U-Turn that fast. The instructions are badly written and the menu is poor. Well, with one minute of game, that is all I have to say. But I bet that if I play more than an hour, I would be capable to write down one book.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 6
savishdevil

"..g"

date: November 29, 2009

Make it to when time runs out the bomb explodes, iow make an explosion!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 2
newt2007

"Poor"

date: November 14, 2009

Don't understand other high scores. The concept was ok if not origional and the graphics were pretty reasonable.
Unfortunately the random cars appearing and then reappearing as you moved in and out of the same piece of landscape was frustrating. To do a uturn into the same area of the landscape where you are sure there was not a car to suddenly find a parked sedan blocking the way was annoying.
Car was too fast for good control and I found myself circlling the powerups as oppose to collecting them.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 6
Crypto145

"holy..."

date: October 8, 2009

mother of god warp...why must you write soo much

eh not a horrible game

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
samsolo2

"Great."

date: September 26, 2009

Nice game: Smooth and enjoyable god 5 min game.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 3
redwire71

"WOW!"

date: September 4, 2009

I dunno whats with all the high scores! I dunno this game was kinda pointless if you ask me... shoulda bought a car with better fuel efish if you ask me gotta fill up wayyyy tooo much lol. great graffics, controls were good but just slightly too tight. the game was way too short but im kinda glad it was cause it had no real point to it but get to the next gas station.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!

Score: 10
NewGroundsFox

"Usually I don't write reviews but something stuck"

date: August 11, 2009

This was very fun, not sure why though, the driving was nice and tight, the camera was smooth and the game play itself was nice, I didn't understand the whole, I'm driving on a beach (or in the desert) with traffic hitting me (if there were bombs wouldn't it be evacuated? I dunno) Either way 5/5 10/10 Great Job.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 8
icelord02

"LOVE IT but....."

date: July 17, 2009

the time was short and it was hard but still nice game...

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 9
WarpZone

"Great gameplay! Make it longer! Here's how:"

date: August 17, 2008

Here's how you take a quick mini-game like this one and turn it into a full-fledged Casual Game:

-Separate the gameplay into discreet stages. (Each stage should have vastly different backgrounds, and one slightly unique twist on gameplay, such as motorcycles instead of cars, or stationary buildings you have to drive around.)

-Make some kinda map screen so the player can replay old stages and unlock new stages.

-Keep a local "top score" for each stage, that represents the player's personal best.

-Add a level-up system that the player can use to "spend" points to improve the capabilities of his vehicle.

-Save these per-stage top scores (and other persistent player stats) to the user's hard drive as a saved game file.

Once you've implemented all of those features, you'll need to balance the game:

-Give the player a way to be a daredevil. That is, let him take on more challenges if he thinks he's powerful enough to get away with it. Let the player up the ante at any time, making the game harder but also increasing the potential rewards.

-In order to beat the last stage, the player will almost NEED to buy all the persistent powerups.

-Achieving the highest possible score in all the stages should give the player PLENTY of points to buy most of the powerups.

-You should be able to beat most of the earlier stages even if you have only minimal powerups.

-A high-level character should be able to replay the earlier stages and, because he's so strong now, be able to take on more challenges and therefore achieve a MUCH higher score than before.

And yes, I stole all of these ideas from GemCraft. :) It's a tower defense game, not a driving game, but it uses a lot of game design ideas that are just good sense for any casual game with quick, simple gameplay.

If you implement all of the ideas above, you'll end up with a long game with plenty of challenges all the way through, wherein the player has total control over his actions, but he gains a slight advantage after every stage, and over time he can be more and more of a daredevil, constantly improving on his previous best scores and learning new obscure tricks towards getting the best scores. And, yes, in this case the scores would actually mean something tangible then just competing with the 20 most hardcore players on the internets, it would be how you level-up over time. :)

You can get away with just a fraction of these things, of course. Just make the game end not when the player finally can't keep up with the escalation and runs out of time, but when the player finally beats the last stage. That alone makes the game more rewarding. "Can I beat the game" is just psychologically much more fun than "How long can I last?" That and some kinda persistent level-up system instead of an oldschool collectable powerup system. Those two things will lend any decent mini-game considerable replay value. You don't necessarily need to copy GemCraft, it's just that GemCraft did a lot of things really well.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!

Score: 8
Mozex

"Cool!"

by: Mozex
date: July 19, 2008

Very cool game but it to short...

Grtzz

Mo7ex

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Sort by: [ date | rating ]

There are 8 pages of reviews. [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 ]