Reviews For: Throwback the Duck Ep. 1A

(133 Reviews • Avg: 8.31/10)

Sort by: [ date | rating ]

There are 14 pages of reviews. [ 146 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 ]


Score: 10
Alwowpal-Jesusfreak

"Awesome!"

date: March 6, 2007

This is one of the best flashes ever! GO THROWBACK!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
elgato1

"Awesome!!"

date: March 6, 2007

This Duck takes me back to Howard the Duck movie. Very nicely done. It's the best I've seen so far.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
Therman

"great stuff :)"

date: March 6, 2007

this will probably get it's own collection soon ;) and i must say that i think it's awesome that you work with a Norwegian guy cause i am Norwegian myself :D this could be on TV so keep up the good work!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 8
rockymike

"Good, but room for improvement."

date: March 6, 2007

This flash is good, but if not for the outstanding artwork, I don't think it could stand on its own two feet. The pacing is too slow and the voice acting leaves something to be desired. Throwback sounds like he's doing his best William Shatner impersonation, and I couldn't understand a word the bird thing was saying. I like where the story is going though and I don't know why you had to break it into two parts (the combined filesize was small enough to fit in one submission (unless you hit the frame limit)).
Anyhow, in conclusion, It's a good series, just needs some of the fat cut out of it. I'm sure it'll be a little easier to do in future episodes as you are still trying to introduce characters and plot elements. I'm sorry if this seems too harsh, that's just some of the thoughts I had while watching. Don't get me wrong, I'll watch every episode you throw at us.
Laters.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!

Score: 10
wolfinator-x

"Cool!"

date: March 6, 2007

It's a great cartoon! This WILL get on the front page. PS: Excellent graphics! You sure do them well!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
Mattyrock

"Finally!"

date: March 6, 2007

The newly great game-orientated series is BACK!!!!

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 9
teddybear-hair

"this was great."

date: March 6, 2007

i loved this. i kinda didnt like throwback's voice, but thats just me. my main cosern was that i nearly closed the window when the opening credits came on cos i thought that they were the closing credits! gonna lose alot of veiwers like that, i think. but those who stay and wack it all wont regret it. now to watch part B...

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
Emilijus

"wow"

date: March 6, 2007

wow this wwas one of the best flashes i ever seen.
a professional work.
paintings and animation was realy good.
btw i liked that part when the duck kicked dog in water , lol 5/5

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 6
RSQViper

"Yowza"

date: March 6, 2007

This movie could be great because of the graphics alone. The artist is absolutely awesome without question and the animation was smooth. There was quite a bit of not using legs to walk and limited FBF, but thta is totally understandable with limited animators and with graphics this beautiful.

But... the writing is not very good. The setting is a cool idea, but flat jokes and bad acting just killed the whole thing for me. I'd love to see someone else pick up the pen and write this. It would easily be #1 on NG, I feel with a good and funny writer.

Best of luck on future episodes. I honestly wish this one was better. (And get a new Throwback actor, he's terrible)

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!

Score: 3
squeakytoad

"I've never seen such talent utterly wasted."

date: March 6, 2007

The art was excellent. There's no doubt about that.
The animation, though, is minimal. Understandable if you want to produce a show often enough. But for almost eight months of work, you don't really have all that much to show. You continually pan still scenes with no movement, or repeat various loops for several minutes at a time. It really wears on the viewer.

The sound quality was absolutely awful. I seriously suggest getting better mics.

Then we come to the acting. I'm really surprised that with this quality work, you couldn't find better voices. This is one of those cases where EVERYONE was awful. It sounded as if everyone was reading a script for the first time, and struggling over even the simplest words.
I know you've stated that you particularly chose the actor for Throwback, but I suggest you particularly dump him before creating more episodes.
He doesn't sound "duck-like" as you stated. He just sounds awful. You can barely make out what he's saying. I reckon he needs a good two years in speech therapy.
And even when I could understand him, I ground my teeth. His acting is atrocious.

Now we come to the writing. Poor. Not a single laugh the whole time.

Basically, I'm incredibly disappointed, especially since the intro episode had soooo much potential. Potential you've thrown out the window.

My constructive criticism: Larsen should seriously forget Gornoski and go back to creating the brilliant pieces he made before this.
Goroski can neither write nor direct. He's sadly lacking in talent.
However, I've seen Larsen's previous works, and loved them. He's a brilliant artist, animator, and has a good share of humor himself.

-st

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
Lots of people find this review helpful!

Sort by: [ date | rating ]

There are 14 pages of reviews. [ 146 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 ]