Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Checking login status…

USERNAME:

PASSWORD:

Logging in…

Logged in as:
.
Logging out…
Inbox My Account Log Out


Reviews For: Battlefield General

(198 Reviews • Avg: 7.86/10)

Sort by: [ date | rating ]

There are 20 pages of reviews. [ 148 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 141720 ]


Score: 7
Ziggy2029

"okay."

date: February 18, 2007

it was good, but after a couple levels I got bored of it.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 6
garret42

"OK"

date: February 18, 2007

Mudge9 what are you a fucking reporter. Ok off subject but yah. It got boring after awhile but a good concept, not great graphics, fun.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 8
mudge9

"Fun, a good start, with flaws"

by: mudge9
date: February 18, 2007

Fun to play, and a great general idea. The following quibbles
are just in case some of this hasn't been covered.

1. Troops won't listen to movement commands once enemy is
close..... won't resume movement commands when combat is
over.

2. Not told how close General has to be to give advantage to
troops.

3. Can't remove anything from towers

4. Nothing can stand up to a bunch of artillery. No real need
to buy anything else on "easy" level.

5. How different terrain affects movement usually makes sense
except for one thing: units are slow moving in hills, but no
difference between uphill and downhill.

6. In a "search out enemy" mission, there's really no need to
search. The map tell you where they all are, and if you
cruise through with a bunch of artillery, any enemy in the
area come to you.

7. There seems to be no difference in range for cannon or
archers according to their elevation. In reality, a cannon
on a hill could easily take out a cannon on the flatlands
long before the latter could get the enemy in range.

8. Anything other than cannon or archers ought to be able to
fight and move at the same time.

9. Not sure about this, since I didn't spend much time on non-easy
levels, but is the only difference among the levels the amount
of money you have to work with?

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People find this review helpful!

Score: 10
ludatha

"Pretty amazing... for flash!"

date: February 18, 2007

As an experienced Age Of Empires play, I found the game quite enjoyable, you do need allot of strategy skills. I love the fact you can speed up the game, something that comes in handy when you want your cannons to go over one of them hills! You should increase the quality a bit and make a projector out of it. I would be the first to buy! :-)
I will defiantly host this game on my site proudly!
Thanks for the game!
-Ludatha

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 9
VelvetDarkRocks

"I liked it!"

date: February 18, 2007

Great game! There are a few indelible mistakes that cause you to start over, like spending too much on your castle/general. Really, you needed neither, although if you were patient your General could be manipulated to boost your army.

I liked the fact that if you made the mistake of buying these types of units and not using them proficiently, your army was overcome and you basically got game over. This game requires strategy, which to a limited degree requires skill. Slow-paced a lot of the time, and with many limitations on borders/obstacles, yet creative use of terrain and environment to hinder enemies, or if you're careless, yourself. You positioned most of your enemy units very well, although if you covered a few strategic points the game became too easy. Lengthy, and at times stagnant, an enjoyable game with many aspects. However, missions took so long that after the first few, this particular gamer feels he's had enough for a little while!

Great idea though, and very well done!

~VelvetDarkRocks~

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
PNK666

"Best online RPG!"

by: PNK666
date: February 18, 2007

I love this game! Commanding 30 soldier armies is fun,but challenging.Later on in the game the levels get REALLY intense.Almost too intense for a strategy type game.The only(and when I say only I mean only) problem is that commanding soldiers in different places can be impossible.But you should still check this game out if you like strategy games.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 10
Anti-pie

"Damn!"

date: February 18, 2007

This game ruled. I found it very entertaining and I was angry that I already beat the first 6 levels. Although I wish I went to the website to play the full version so I wouldn't have to redue the levels again. Not sure why people say its hard I beat the first six on medium with only retrying 2 times which was because I really had no idea what was going on here.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 7
sephicloud10

"Alright"

date: February 17, 2007

It was alright

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
People think this is a useless review.

Score: 6
takata5

"not bad"

date: February 17, 2007

Almost like warcraft, though I miss gathering the gold and wood and building structures. Still not bad, but even on easy setting I only got to mission 4...

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Score: 9
rootbeerfloat

"I liked it..."

date: February 17, 2007

Very fun and addicting.

Rate this review:
Helpful!
Useless.
Flag as abusive.
No users have weighed in on this review.

Sort by: [ date | rating ]

There are 20 pages of reviews. [ 148 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 141720 ]