Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Score: 1

"63 is better"

by: Gogetarules

date: December 6, 2009

this is crap. all who agree play super mario 63 k? k.

Score: 10

"cool"

by: left4deadtank1

date: December 5, 2009

im adding this to my favs

Score: 5

"Thank you!"

by: Daerhos

date: December 4, 2009

For making the sequel/prequel to this game!

No offense, but this game was... horrible. Too many glitches and I lagged (probably my computer, don't worry). The stats above you were VERY annoying.

This one gets a 5 from me, sorry mate.

Score: 6

"???"

by: killer0pancakes

date: December 3, 2009

can someone explain to me why im constantly taking damage?
at about every 3-5 seconds?

is it supposed to do that?

Score: 7

"easy"

by: qdogxdxd

date: November 30, 2009

pretty good but too easy

Score: 10

"nice"

by: Leprechaun59

date: November 30, 2009

friggin sweet

Score: 9

"to Wellbe"

by: ElectroMaster115

date: November 15, 2009

Because we ALL know good graphics make a good game anyway its a good beta version

Score: 6

"*facepalm for critics*"

by: Masahiiro

date: November 11, 2009

Oh god... people, look, this is first version of a Super Mario 63... Then please, stop to compare the final version to beta version >:

Score: 3

"decent"

by: jameskwilson

date: November 9, 2009

its good but lets say this is like a cupcake and mario63 is like a whole cake wich would you rather have im fat so i would want the whole cake bad graphics sprites are like a second grader drew them 3/10

Score: 6

"Try Again"

by: WarningK

date: November 2, 2009

As a Mario Fan-made game, but compared to Super Mario 63 which is some of Rumouw's better work this isn't very good, the sprites are a sloppy selection at best, the sounds quality is poor and demotivating, and the gameplay interface is too simple. For a better Mario game stick to Super Mario 63.