Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gf5HB YTJTXebd3kVnFkXW_SAaowwD9490U0O2

There will be no more.

So is this a good thing or a bad thing?

At 11/5/08 06:21 PM, Ragnarokia wrote: Isn't Obama for gay marriage I heard?

He is for civil unions.

At 11/5/08 06:23 PM, ozzyleghorn wrote: *pffft* This will not last long, dude. I'm all for no gay marriage in Cali. but I honestly think people will find away around this decision.

They did the same thing 8 years ago. Banned gay marriage. Then they did something undemocratic and overturned it against the people's will. That means Democrats and Republicans are fascists.

Does that mean i'm not allowed to marry my brother in California

At 11/5/08 06:25 PM, H-h-h-heliopios wrote: Does that mean i'm not allowed to marry my brother in California

no matter where you are you cant marry your brother....thats just sick....

anyways, i personally have no problem with gays or gay marriage. i have a gay cousin, my girlfriend's parents are lesbians, and i have a few gay friends. its not right for the government to say it isn't right to marry someone of the same sex. it just seems unconstitutional.

At 11/5/08 06:20 PM, Headshot777 wrote: So is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Depends on your views and opinions. I'm not thrilled as I have friends who will have their marriages disolved.

this saddens me =[

When will people stop shoving their fucking noses in other people's fucking business about this shit? It's not like people HAVE to get gay marriages, it means they have an OPTION. Honestly, if you're not gay, that fucking proposition had almost nothing to do with you, and your petty discomfort with gay people now means that you've successfully infringed on the happiness of man, many people over their lives.

Congratulations America.

They arent getting "married" instead they will just be "butt buddies"
They arent getting "engaged" instead they are called "butt buddies"
They arent "betrothed" they are "butt buddies"

Don't they still have absentee ballots to count?

It could POSSIBLY, possibly overturn the yes votes.

Seriously, how the fuck did this pass in motherfucking California?

Well I voted no, and my mom voted yes. Ehhh... oh well.

At 11/5/08 07:43 PM, ParadoxSaint wrote: Seriously, how the fuck did this pass in motherfucking California?

You scream my thoughts.

Fuck yeah.

Once again Massachusetts defeats the competition. >:D

How the fuck did 8 pass anyway? It's aganist the constitution.

At 11/5/08 06:19 PM, patm1313 wrote: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gf5HB YTJTXebd3kVnFkXW_SAaowwD9490U0O2

There will be no more.

Well, I guess I better throwout that engagement I just bought.

I heard the majority was against it in the first place.

cool/

At 11/5/08 06:22 PM, Timmy wrote: At some point this nation really needs to break ties with its puritan roots and get over itself.

We can't just dishonor the Founding Fathers! That would be like burning a flag, or spiting in the face of a veteran.

California would never do such a thing!

Gays are born there!

At 11/5/08 06:25 PM, StealthBadger201 wrote: They did the same thing 8 years ago. Banned gay marriage. Then they did something undemocratic and overturned it against the people's will. That means Democrats and Republicans are fascists.

They went agaisnt the public and gave equal rights to gays. Thos fascists and thier damn obsession with equal rights.

At 11/5/08 07:41 PM, JadeTheAssassin wrote: Don't they still have absentee ballots to count?

It could POSSIBLY, possibly overturn the yes votes.

They only count them if the absentee votes will make a difference. If the vote was 100 voting yes and 10 voted no and there was only ten absentee ballots they would not count them becasue even if all the ballots said no it would not make a difference.

At 11/5/08 06:32 PM, UberToastMan666 wrote:

At 11/5/08 06:25 PM, H-h-h-heliopios wrote: Does that mean i'm not allowed to marry my brother in California

no matter where you are you cant marry your brother....thats just sick....

anyways, i personally have no problem with gays or gay marriage. i have a gay cousin, my girlfriend's parents are lesbians, and i have a few gay friends. its not right for the government to say it isn't right to marry someone of the same sex. it just seems unconstitutional.

I read your post, and I thought that was interesting. If gay marriage is legal, then where do we draw the line? Is animal sex okay then? I'm reather neutral on gay rights, but I'm wondering where that line is, and it has to be fine
America itself is rather paradoxial. It is the land of freedom, but where do you put a limitation on that? I'm not bashing America or Gays, at least not on purpose, but I just thought I'd throw that out.

Yeah I know, it makes me sick, whatever. Fuck organized religion having control over everything.

At 11/5/08 06:25 PM, StealthBadger201 wrote:

At 11/5/08 06:23 PM, ozzyleghorn wrote: *pffft* This will not last long, dude. I'm all for no gay marriage in Cali. but I honestly think people will find away around this decision.

They did the same thing 8 years ago. Banned gay marriage. Then they did something undemocratic and overturned it against the people's will. That means Democrats and Republicans are fascists.

8 years ago was when W Bush first came into office so it was the Republicans who were fascist, not the Democrats.

Good. I don't like homosexuality, even less the whole "gay marriage" thing. Call me old-fashioned, but I think marriage should be between a man and a woman, not a man and a man or a woman and a woman. I'm kinda weird like that, ya know? Heterosexual marriage and the families it forms are the basis of Western culture, and gay marriage would just mess up marriage, already a weakened institution, even more by taking away one of the few things that remains to it.