At 11/5/08 11:51 PM, tony4moroney wrote:
This is a patently wrong worldview to have, or at least in my opinion and how our current society sees it and I wouldn't want my children to grow up with those images engraved into their minds.
Current society elected Bush twice.
As long as you don't cause harm, you can think WHATEVER YOU WANT about women. You can even hate them. You can fuck guys OUT OF SPITE and don't let any bible-thumping, bra-burning douchebags tell you that what turns you on is right or wrong.
And here's more food for thought: I claim that women think men are only good for money and that it's wrong to show rich men in movies because it gives women the impression that men will always buy them everything.
How that's not even WORSE? They don't even like ME they like my money! At least if you objectify a woman, you'd like HER anyway.
FUN, FUN TIME.
At 11/6/08 12:37 AM, Proteas wrote:
I'm a human being, of course my opinions are biased. Are you telling me that you aren't human and are completely unbiased?
In the case they we'd both be biased, I think it's safer to not pass any laws or advocate restrictions. You always need a damn good reason to take away people's rights, no matter their age.
So on that front alone, even if we're BOTH super-biased, I think I'd still win.
of the author AGAIN because it still doesn't meet you're standards for objectivity.
Haha MY standard? I doubt you could convince anyone with a reference to a study without having the study in hand yourself.
I'd believe you if there was some sort of evidence landslide but it seems pretty divided and subjective.
Then you can't make the claim that kids are capable of coming to their own decisions sans outside influence
That's why we live in a society. They'd get porn, but they'll get everyone's values too. I don't see how watching porn will undo all the parenting work or the laws. Porn's influence would only be bad IN a vacuum where that's all they ever see of sex.
Then why don't you conduct your own study
I don't think they'd let me : (
.... I just explained, in the plainest terms, what a change of attitude could lead to
Haha no you didn't. You said "abuse" when it wasn't brought up. Then I guess you forgot what you were talking about.
Unless you mean the "objectification of women" which you failed to explain.
So again, what are the concrete "abusive" actions? Cause "objectification of women" is a VIEWPOINT and a THOUGHT and you know what we call people who police people's thoughts?
How's this for outside the Bible Belt?
What the fuck? That shit is retarded. Am I a television addict if I watch tv 11 hours a week? Again this seems like a shitty article written by some idiot who think porn will destroy the world.
Oh shit I'm an internet addict, I'm on the internet every day! If you asked me 10 questions about the internet, you'd find that I AM BIASED IN FAVOR OF THE INTERNET! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!