Be a Supporter!

World War 1 games?

  • 1,506 Views
  • 6 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
chaseXXarmstrong
chaseXXarmstrong
  • Member since: Nov. 23, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Blank Slate
World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:01:28 Reply

Has anyone else noticed that there are like 10000 WW2 games, but pretty much no WW1 games?

I played Warfare 1917...

and it kinda got me thinking why no one has jumped on this. I searched WW1 games on wikipedia and such and all i got was flight simulator games. Not a single trench warfare game such as Warfare 1917, possibly a first person game though or even a RTS.
Any ideas as to why its like this?

(I'm sorry if you think this belongs in the video game section but its not really talking about a specific game just an idea relating to WW1 games.)


status: unbanned!

BBS Signature
Fleshlight
Fleshlight
  • Member since: Aug. 8, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Blank Slate
Response to World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:03:53 Reply

you don't get to kill nazis in ww1 games


|_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_|

xports
xports
  • Member since: Jun. 14, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Gamer
Response to World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:04:04 Reply

That's because weapons were more interesting in WWI. Weapons back then flat out sucked.


Now with 100% more Steam! lI Minecraft you say? 63.246.149.6 II XBL: WorseThanMonday II

BBS Signature
chaseXXarmstrong
chaseXXarmstrong
  • Member since: Nov. 23, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Blank Slate
Response to World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:04:22 Reply

At 10/26/08 01:03 AM, Fleshlight wrote: you don't get to kill nazis in ww1 games

good point...


status: unbanned!

BBS Signature
xports
xports
  • Member since: Jun. 14, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Gamer
Response to World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:05:20 Reply

At 10/26/08 01:04 AM, xports wrote: That's because weapons were more interesting in WWII. Weapons back then flat out sucked.

Fixed. Just caught that.


Now with 100% more Steam! lI Minecraft you say? 63.246.149.6 II XBL: WorseThanMonday II

BBS Signature
chaseXXarmstrong
chaseXXarmstrong
  • Member since: Nov. 23, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 06
Blank Slate
Response to World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:05:34 Reply

At 10/26/08 01:04 AM, xports wrote: That's because weapons were more interesting in WWI. Weapons back then flat out sucked.

yeah i can see that, but that whole trenchwarfare for an RTS would be pretty cool i think.
Imagine warfare 1917 on a much larger scale. I think it would make for a decent shooter too, if the put the effort in


status: unbanned!

BBS Signature
Fleshlight
Fleshlight
  • Member since: Aug. 8, 2008
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 07
Blank Slate
Response to World War 1 games? 2008-10-26 01:10:36 Reply

At 10/26/08 01:05 AM, chaseXXarmstrong wrote:
At 10/26/08 01:04 AM, xports wrote: That's because weapons were more interesting in WWI. Weapons back then flat out sucked.
yeah i can see that, but that whole trenchwarfare for an RTS would be pretty cool i think.
Imagine warfare 1917 on a much larger scale. I think it would make for a decent shooter too, if the put the effort in

they barely did anything in ww1. very little strategy because of shit weapons and artillery. all they did was dig trenches on either side and bombed the shit out of each other until one side was completely demolished. you think that would be a good concept for a game?


|_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_|