At 9/9/06 08:31 PM, Craig wrote:
That he himself finally hit 2x10k, though they're basically the same thing ;)
Ahhhhs. Yep.
Your new name threw me for a loop at first, BTW.
Sure enough. Just imagine I typed "Kirk_Cocaine (9328 posts), " in between the joobie and ORKarate mentions on the 9k/10k list, then. #;-}>
I was surprised you didn't add him on to the page.
I've corrected my updates in the past, mostly for spelling or a typo or a screw up or a wrong stat in the "stat stats" numbers... more rarely for actual list-part-data-wrongness, since that doesn't happen as often, fortunately.
But it takes time, and it's a waste of time, IMO, so I don't do it no more.
Any peops I leave off an update, especially if it's just a 1x10k mention or a 9k/10k list inclusion... just have to wait till next time.
After all, if I wanted to be REALLY accurate, the people with like 17,000 blams (such as the one I gave belated congrats to today) would need to be added to the 1x10k list back in like March or April.
I'm not gonna go back half a dozen updates to make a small change to make everything 100% accurate. #;-}>
Well he made it on, like I said. That guy posts like crazy. He recieved a 3-day ban within that month as well I believe :o
Yeah, it really surprised me how fast he made the 2x10k.
Always nice to beat Denvish, I was hoping I could beat him in star count before he retires on 100K B/P, but there's no way that's gonna happen. He's far too close now ;_;
You've gone and killed him again this month, too.
I take it you think that beating him in star count after he retires at 100,000 won't hold the same meaning?
Well, I know at times I do post a lot, I've had a few days where I've made over 40 posts. Amazing when you think about it, considering I only really post in Wi/Ht?
Not really. I only really post on Wi/Ht? too, though I've posted a good dozen posts today in the new News topic and on the mod forum.... but, if I really wanted to, I could keep active on this forum at least 3-4 times a week and hit 10,000 posts in no time.
But I don't want to use all my free time just to be a postmonger. #;-}>
I should probably start tracking everyone with 10K+ Saves and Blams for you in case you miss someone, considering those are both stats I track...
Well, I'm even more worried about the people with 9k+. #;-}>
Although I wouldn't be insanely shocked if it turns out I'm missing someone who should be on the list RIGHT NOW, I'm more worried about future inductees who I'm going to miss.
Of course, some of those could be over 10k in blams right now, and will hit 10k saves without me noticing first... so in that case, checking everyone with 10k+ saves or 10k+ blams would be teh good method, actually.
I've been more worried in the past few months about the 10k exp and 10k post people. Which is why I updated a shitload of high posters back in February or so, and updated up through the top 500 expers in July.
I need to check up on b/p and posts again, though.
And it would help if I just made sure I had everyone on the top 500 exp every two months or so. Cause when I wait a year to do it, it takes forever to add the 100+ new people that are in the top 500 exp to my spreadsheet. I think it was almost 150 people this time around. EUUGUGHGHGHGH...
When there's 100+ EGSC's, EGSC will be totally meaningless. Unless of course you're right at the top, or near it.
Well yeah. And similarly, being near the top of the pentalist will always be cooler than just being on it.
But that said, when I changed over from quad to penta... and when it then cut down to 2x10k and we had only 30 people on it... it was small and exclusive enough that being in the 20-30 range was just about as cool as being in the top 20 or top 10, if not quite as impressive.
That would mean not answering questions though ;)
Not answering as many, you mean. I didn't say quit cold turkey. #;-}>
Well I finally got my saves above 50% of my blams, which had been something I'd wanted to achieve for ages. I bot it because of Clock Day though, which makes it seem like less of an achievement, even though I was getting there bit by bit without it...
Awesome. I don't think that matters, personally. Clock Day is part of the portal, so it's perfectly natural to gain stats from it... just as natural as the shit and good stuff that comes through the portal on the other 364/365 days of the year.
Yeah, losing reviews is annoying, and you lose a lot when you have so goddamn many. I don't really lose many posts though, and it's odd when I do. I recall a few months back I lost over 10 posts suddenly, I still have no idea which thread could have gotten deleted for such a thing to happen...
I have reviewed my way back up to 654 reviews like TWO OR THREE times in the past few months... and AGAIN this past week I slip down to 653... and then this weekend, 652. (sigh)
I'm just glad that it slipped a second time before I reviewed that ONE flash, so now I just have to get into a reviewing mood once, not twice.
(that I know of)
Fucking LLL. Someone should get all stats to 9999, apart from one, then get that ridiculously high and go from not being listed, to penta-listed in one update, also topping the LLL for eternity ;)
Heh. Nah. Someone could just repeat the feat 6 months later and due to the 30+ more people on the pentalist, they'd have a higher leap. #;-}>
But that's impossible anyway. By that time, I'll have stopped doing the list. It'll be way too insane by then.
Woah, that's a lot, Clock Day helped there though ;)
Actually, no it didn't. I may have posted the update on 8/18, but if you didn't notice, it is dated as (and thus the data is meant to be closest in actual "origin" to) 8/09.
Most of the data pull was before Clock Day. Certainly for all the 108 members that were on the list as of 8/09.
So your Clock Day stats are on this new update, the 9/04 update I just posted today, 9/10.
List Leap List as of 20060809
(up from 65 to 78 list-leapers)
That list has gotten crazy O_O
87 now. The craziness continues.
Nice update gfox, thanks for doing it
month late reply :o
Thanks for the reply, doesn't matter to me how late it is!
I'm equally as likely to have forgotten what I was talking about with people be it two weeks ago or two months ago, after all. #;-}>