At 1/22/04 08:11 PM, XwaynecoltX wrote:
22 -- 05120 -- 10000 -- 01856 -- 07090 -- 24066 -- XwaynecoltX (+49)
Thanks GFOX for the 5+ boost, i had forgot about this list and the dns thing kinda gave me a little boost, ranked 22 notbad i guess...
Sure thing, man. Wouldn't want to have kept you off the list for a measly 5 points.
22... not bad? It's higher than you rank on the top 50 b/p or the savior list or... any list aside from the review list, man. It's GREAT, not "not bad." #;-}>
At 1/24/04 07:12 AM, alexsmolik wrote:
But dude, I need like more than 2000 to get to the next level. Haha.
Impossible.
Pfft. Impossible?
Then what do you call the 4500 points I just started on to get EGSC (and Crono's just finishing)?
At 1/23/04 09:45 AM, _altr_ wrote:
/me bites off Bob's ears so he can't listen to movies and screws up his b/ping
I'd be able to beat him but some people work for a living, lol.
11 days and counting .
Um, I think there needs be more bold in there somewhere, maybe where the user has 10,000+ (wasn't it like that before?). Wouldn't get in the way of the bold totals as no one has 10,000 reviews. Otherwise looks coo ...
No, it was never like that. I've relied upon --'s between columns to keep things neat in this list, as opposed to boldface AND --'s like on my top 50 lists.
I only just added the boldface to the overall point total.
I'll think about adding boldface to the 100+ amounts in the other four columns, but there's two main reasons I haven't already:
1) putting the tags into the excel file is doable (like I just did with the total column, I put them after one -- and before the -- between the total and the name column), but it's a pain. Especially if a lot of people suddenly start getting over 10k in something.
2) more importantly, the extra characters from all those tags could make this list a 2 post list.
I'd like to keep it all in one post for as long as possible, but then... once more and more people get added to it (4 last time, probably 4 next time), it's going to be too long to fit into one post, anyway.
At some point I'm either going to stop doing the list or cut it down to a certain amount. Because if there's 150+ people with 10k+ points in at least one category... there's no way in hell I'm doing the list the same way.
In fact, what better time than now. VOTE TIME, people:
If the list starts getting too big and thus competing with my 2 top 50 lists and the VP list for my time even more than it does now...
would you rather see:
a cutoff of the number of people on the list, say at 100.
or
a raising of the stat # bar to get on the list. For instance, I could raise it to 15,000 points, instead of 10,000.
