At 3/6/05 12:02 AM, EKRegulus wrote:
Nope, I never said it directly but it was indeed easy to guess.
Yes. You hide your motives POORLY, sir. #;-}>
Indeed, I don't plan to stop depositing and hopefully more users in front of me won't active enough to keep their exp advantage. It will take a while to catch them though.
That's all you can hope for, yeah. Missed deposits. It works remarkably well, though, as long as you are patient and diligent.
Then I guess that I will have to do it myself.... or not. Expect me to be under 200 reviews for a looooooong period.
Well, you were at 109 on Saturday, so that doesn't surprise me much. I moved (and still move) slow on reviews... except for one brief period in August/September of last year, when I went from 300 to 500 reviews very quickly.
073.) 03785 - 14988 - 05340 - 02158 - 00109 - 26380 | EKRegulus +6
Excellent. I only need to keep a similar pace and reaching the top50 shouldn't be problem.
It looks that way, but just keep in mind that your +6 is going to become increasinly difficult to even APPROACH in the future, let alone reach or top. And also, that your 26k total doesn't prevent many people from jumping right over you when they enter the list for the first time, too.
At 3/6/05 12:13 AM, YoinK_VineS wrote:
very nice update gfox.
But not only did i make it to that triplelist... but I finally made it to a 50k+ total.
Now I need to Review and Post.... because I want to be on that quad and penta list someday... could take about 2 years before I get a 10K+ of reviews or posts.
Thanks, Yoink. Yep, a new 50ker. We've got ramagi above 80k... me above 70k... and Recon above 60k. And then we've got what... almost 10 people between 50k and 60k now?! Insanity! You guys have quite the competition going down there. BEWARE TEH MPA! #;-}>
At 3/6/05 12:26 AM, Inuzuka-Kiba wrote:
099.) 03075 - 10431 - 04155 - 03171 - 00129 - 20961 | Inuzuka-Kiba +81
Haha, looks as if my estimates of around 20,000 total points getting into the list was correct. A nice little spot at #99 there. If only Crow-Clock has missed a deposit or something, I wanted to come in alone. Oh well. I guess I'll just be happy being higher on the list than the guy. >:P
Well, you'd have to backtrack several days to when you actually hit 10k blams, but... yeah, pretty good for a guess.
Are you THAT silly of teh egomaniacal man that you HAD to have the "new entry" spotlight to yourself? Just be thankful it was a 2 new entry weekened instead of what HAD become the usual (4 or 5 or 6 new entries) in the past few updates.
At 3/6/05 12:41 AM, ramagi wrote:
001.) 12990 - 40093 - 20156 - 05998 - 01061 - 80298 | ramagi
Well I figured I could make 80k by this update.
Thanks for the update gfoxcook.
And so you did. Won't be long before you hit 100k, ya maniac! #;-}> You're welcome, glad you enjoyed it. I think your 40k+ blams and 20k+ saves look the best of all your stats (including the 80k total, I mean) on that line. Congrats on all of that (plus your 13k exp, too)!
At 3/7/05 04:30 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote:
012.) 06935 - 25965 - 10538 - 04178 - 00139 - 47755 | D0GMA
013.) 08900 - 10716 - 07300 - 08509 - 10266 - 45691 | XwaynecoltX +2
Awsome update, Dogma might be a tough one maybe but anyways nice update and +2 is cool...
Yeah, you got a bit of a gap there between both of you. But eventually you'll get that +1 due to Dogma having retired her account from b/ping.
I believe you were #12 on the QuadList last August before I changed it to the PentaList, so... you're almost back to your old spot on the list, too!
At 3/7/05 04:57 AM, RedCircle wrote:
At 3/5/05 11:22 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
At 3/5/05 09:29 AM, RedCircle wrote:
You owe me, Greg. I'm not even on this list, and I'm helping you out.
Two words:
Monetary. Supplements.
(snip my intentional overreaction)
Yeah, good job taking my joke WAY too seriously.
=\
hahahah. Look, man, I obviously knew the "monetary. supplements." part was a joke (and a somewhat funny one, too). If you thought I was reacting at all without humour to that part, I wasn't. I just resented the implication, even in a light-hearted joking manner... that I was demanding a certain amount of posts in here. I think we've all been down that road and been over that before (like say 2 or 3 weeks ago, whenever it was, in the VP list topic). And I just wanted to superemphasise that I was asking that 3 posts be the MAXIMUM, not the exact amount needed. #;-}>
Anyway, thanks for the update.
You got it. Now GET SOME PENTAPOINTS, mofo! Then you can't use your sly "I ain't even on this list" comments in the future. #;-}>
At 3/7/05 06:14 AM, BonusStageInBed wrote:
036.) 03190 - 17274 - 06338 - 07700 - 00260 - 34762 | BonusStage +1
OMFGOMGFMO gfox, i have 3 AND 6, isn't that awesome
Think of some random stuff to talk about >.<, you're the fun mod :D
You have SEVERAL 3s and 6s, actually.
3 in your exp. 3, 3, 6 in your saves. 6 in your reviews. 3, 6 in your total. = SWEET.
But yes, that #36 ranking is the best part of all... ESPECIALLY in light of the fact that you were apparently #37 last update (which I thankfully didn't notice/realise until right now #;-}>).
At 3/8/05 06:36 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote:
GFOX where does this list rank in longest or time consuming to make and stuff? just wanted to know...
Back when I was manually doing this list with the VP list and both top 50s... doing the top 50s was hardest, because of the way I had my excel file. Though I might have actually had to get the most info from profiles for this list, there were far fewer profiles to go through than for the VP list, though... in general, I'd say the VP list was easiest back then, then this one, then the top 50s.
Nowadays? Well, this list is obviously still harder than the VP list, especially now that this list grows every update but the VP list stays at 500 (not that I'm pulling data manually anymore, but it does impact certain things, timewise). This list... right now... can take around 2-3 hours to do versus 1 hour for the VP list.
The main reason this list is hard to do, though... is that I'm basically updating it twice in two different spreadsheet files (one for the BBS, one for the web). If I cut out the BBS version, my life will be much easier in this topic.
