At 8/30/04 07:17 AM, IM_KOOL_R_U wrote:
That sounds good to me. Twice a month would let me see how much i have alot more than now.
Good, glad to hear that's more agreeable to ya.
At 8/30/04 10:11 AM, D0GMA wrote:
I had a feeling this was still going to require quite a bit of work. Still, as you mentioned at least the stat pull is a non-issue =)
Indeed. This one'll never be as fast as the VP list, now that the VP list doesn't care if it's the top 100, top 500, or top 1000, pretty much. Simple one column pastejob over there. This list is envious. #;-}> Like I said, it's not even that it's a five column pastejob and the necessity of carefully pasting correctly... it's the fact that I can't just plop all current listees' and potential listees' data in and sort by total, as I'd be shuffling the people with a stat over 10,000 and the people without a stat over 10,000 together as thoroughly as a Vegas blackjack dealer shuffles the deck. And that would be messy to visually confirm and resort that way... so instead I have to JUST do the current listees first, then pull the "almost there on exp" people's exp column, the "almost there on blams" people's blam column, etc. etc. etc. and shuffle those according to that ONE stat, and then sort in the ones who've now made the list just under the listees and THEN resort the list with the new additions.
Twice a month sounds good. More frequently might be overkill.
So IKRU did feel. #;-}>
How does ~1st and 15th of every month sound? Not as often as every week, not as rare as every month. Twice a month, like I said I might do.
Pretty much what I was thinking.
Groovy. Well, I clearly won't be updating on Sept. 1st, but expect the next one mid-month then. My girlfriend's birthday is the 13th, and thus it may not be exactly on the 15th, but anywho..
Doublelisted people (15 total, 1 new):
It will still be a bit until I get my saves up and over, but there's been a surprisingly large number of new artists submitting work (their own work) that's worth watching. Maybe the portal bans are just making it easier for me to notice them since there's less clutter ~shrug~
Maybe so, maybe so. But I think it's more than that. The numbers lately tend to be around 200 submissions, 110 deleted. That's 90 that aren't, and even if 20 are whistled, that's 70 protects, say. Pretty impressive number ANYTIME a day's savecount is > 50% of the blamcount, IMO.
002.) 06800 - 25144 - 17144 - 06700 - 00432 - 56220 | gfoxcook +1
Grats on passing the robot =)
Thanks muchly. Of course, I passed it quite some time ago, as I said... if I'd just delayed the PREVIOUS update a few days, I woulda been ahead already, but MOI?! SELF-SERVING LIST UPDATES?! NEVER! #;-}>
012.) 05095 - 21999 - 09085 - 02556 - 00124 - 38859 | D0GMA +1
Heh, I need to keep up this BP pace or I'll lose that rank the second X makes it back on.
Heh. Well, he's not exactly RIGHT on the verge quite yet, but yes... best not to be too complacent in your position, I s'pose.
021.) 09691 - 07091 - 06047 - 10053 - 00055 - 32937 | poxpower +90
048.) 03450 - 10124 - 03510 - 05540 - 00319 - 22943 | BVBG +61
053.) 04925 - 04337 - 01840 - 10096 - 00796 - 21994 | bumcheekcity +57
073.) 02250 - 10135 - 02474 - 01250 - 00094 - 16203 | IAmNone +35
Presumably that huge plus comes from the fact that he wasn't listed last time ... still, welcome, and welcome back =)
Were you grouping together all the new entrants? You forgot the two who made it in on exp, if so.
If you didn't gather it from the big paragraph up there explaining the new method of getting a list ready along with the NG Lister... there were 105 people on the list last time, and 6 new additions (2 exp, 2 blam, 2 post)... I stacked them up at the end of the already-on-the-list section, and thus they ended up with 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, and 111 as their "last update's rank" numbers. It's the best way to do it because I can't sort by the old totals as there ARE no old totals for the new people to the list. I don't keep non-listees with info in their cells.
But, I should note I was doing it that way BEFORE the NG Lister was created as well. I just think that since this list is so arbitrary to begin with that it doesn't really need any attempt at accurate new entrant placement like I do try to do with the VP list. It's a fabricated stat amalgam and I imagine new people to the list "entering from the bottom," even if they're actually gonna be #12 or #13 like XwaynecoltX for example. #;-}>
At 8/30/04 12:11 PM, Crono- wrote:
At 8/29/04 09:22 PM, gfoxcook wrote:
009.) 06950 - 24652 - 10008 - 01205 - 00187 - 43002 | Crono-
awesome, <3 having 2 stats above 10k.
No kidding. Ain't it grand? #;-}>
now all i have to do is get 50k altogether.
50k IS 10k * 5, I suppose. Never thought of that before, for some strange reason. O_o With all the people who wish they were on this list and have > 10,000 total stats but not a single stat over 10k... me and ramagi and fixit (And soon Recon) having over 50k in total stats but not over 10k in all 5 stats is kinda similar... heh...
It's like humans thinking they're gods to the ants (that'd be us listees compared to the nonlistees), but then the actual gods looking down on US as ants (that'd be the 10k+ exp, blam, save, post, AND review gods compared to us puny non10kinallfivestats listees).
At 8/30/04 01:20 PM, jonthomson wrote:
At 8/30/04 12:11 PM, Crono- wrote:
Has anyone ever told you/have you ever noticed that "acquired" is spelt wrong in your sig, and do you care
I personally never noticed because I don't often examine sigs so closely. Good eye there, jon. #;-}>
But I think a more pressing question is whether or not he ever noticed me telling him weeks ago that while his sig text says "19th in VP," the page of my VP list topic that text links to (page 29) does NOT display him as #19 on the VP list, as that update is months old. #;-}>
Anyway, I finally caught up on level up!, but no other topics besides my two lists and the NG Lister topic... I'll get to other ones (such as checking out your list update) tomorrow or something. (yawn)... G'NIGHT, ALL!
