At 11/27/03 02:57 AM, MofoMAC wrote:
Yeah, it's a good idea. I suppose you could update it like every month or so. Updating regulary would be pointless as it would hardly change i imagine. It's a nie little list to reffer to. Cheers gfox!
Heh. Glad you enjoyed the stats. Sorry that you're not on it at the moment.
And while I can't guarantee I'll update it often, if ever... if you hit 10,000 on one of the three stats covered in the list, I'll definitely update it just for you. Happy? #;-}>
what did you think of the formatting. Were there too many --'s between stat columns? What did you think (and anyone else, BTW, please feedback!) of the ___s in front of less-than-5-digit numbers to make the columns line up?
I did that instead of putting 0 00 000 or 0000 in front of the lower than 10,000 numbers because if I'd put the 0s in, it'd be really hard to see who had a lot of that stat and who didn't.
Anywho. One thing that's interesting to note is that there's way more top 50 blammer/saviors towards the top of the list than there are top 50 experience people. There's a ton of people in that first 28 top exp people who hardly have any posts or blams/saves, and that explains that. Whereas most people who have over 10,000 b/p (the first 30 of the top b/p list) have plenty of posts and/or exp, at least.
Also, only 5 people from the top 50 BBS posters made the list, as there aren't that many people with over 10,000 posts.
28 from exp + 30 from b/p + 5 from BBS = 63
63 - biteme, shrapnel, nemesis (due to their being on two lists each, and needing to get rid of one of their entries) = 63 - 3 = a nice even top 60.
Of course, a few people on the b/p list are gonna break 10,000 very soon. And a few people on the exp list might, but not as quickly. No one's in danger of breaking 10,000 anytime soon on the poster list, though, that's for sure.
and with that, I'm outta here. laters. remember, please feedmeback!