LIST UPDATE REPLY
At 1/16/09 10:07 AM, Bahamut wrote:
Hello all and welcome to Bahamut's 2x10k Pentalist update #8!
Woot.
Two more changes here. The first one being the list of Triplelisters is no more after a suggestion from gfox via Steam chat. Also, from now on, no commentaries for each 1x10k entry since it was overkill last time.
Taking advice on how to make updates shorter and sweeter from big ol' longwinded gasbag gfox is pure ironic gold. I CAN SURE GIVE ADVICE, but I can't take it myself. #;-}>
Enjoy my 8th 2x10k Pentalist update!
Boy howdy!
NEXT UPDATE: 14th February 2009
SPECIAL VALENTINE'S DAY TIEMS.
Blams: 4,523,785 ( +64,697 ) 18,023 ( -402.95 )
Saves: 3,978,523 ( +122,372 ) 16,025 ( +89.78 )
OH BOY, blams and saves have tightened to a 18k/16k average situation. PARITY AHOY!
I see you trimmed out the insanely long 3x section. Much better with just the 5x and 4x now, yes.
250+ pentalisters. Woot woot.
15 0 **** gfoxcook 22,750 36,000 31,836 11,659 759 103,004 +753
Woot woot. I totally had forgotten I'd gotten back up to #15... I was just looking at my final update a few days ago from when I was #17, and.... yeah, it slipped my mind. Woot. Still.. such slow, slow progress. 31848 saves as of right now. I managed to get 12 over the weekend. #;-}>
YEAH!
Thanks for the update, ma... dragon.
At 1/16/09 12:09 PM, Auz wrote:
Yeah I guess it used to be some sort of special hall of fame. But it didn´t seem to have much point anymore, now that there were like 100+ people on it.
Well, the only reason I ever made a triplelisted hall of famey area was that back in those days, we HAD no quadlisted and pentalisted people, so triplelisted was the cream of the crop, no?
Also, as you kinda hint at, there weren't 100+ people on it back then. #;-}>
And finally, I just wanted to recognise anyone who went "above and beyond" the list requirements (those being 2x), so anyone who gained more than just 2x... that being 3 4 or 5x... got special mention. But yeah, too many people, hence my recommendation and Bahamut's apparent agreement with it. #;-}>
At 1/18/09 01:36 PM, Bahamut wrote:
At 1/16/09 10:44 AM, zimzap wrote:
At 12/19/08 10:04 PM, iscrulz wrote:
Um this is too confusing can you post in American date format. No YYYY being first shit either just mm/dd/yy
It is actually DD/MM/YY... I am not sure how you thought it was YYYY first. Anyway, here you go:
He mentioned the YYYY first because gfox uses a YYYY/MM/DD date format, because he finds it's more convenient for him.
It's more convenient for everyone, but not everyone realises it (yet? we can hope).
For anyone who's ever been pissed off when a computer ordered shit-that-contains-dates-in-the-filename s out of order because it was by filename and not by date (I suppose some people just leave their folders/directories sorted by date, but I like filename sorting), YYYYMMDD is the way to go. From largest unit of time to smallest. Add hrs and mins after days if you like and go SUPERINSANE with the detail. #;-}>