Saw V

[shocktherapy]

WTF! ng do u think they have gone to far? express ur ideas! Is IT going to be even good?

[Murad136]

Of course it will be good! It's SAW! I can't wait for it to come out!

[Strongbow]

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Murad136 wrote: Of course it will be good! It's SAW! I can't wait for it to come out!

I agree with the above post.
SAW rocks.

[Mechabloby]

Can't really say. Not seen the fourth yet but the series hasn't let me down, yet.

[Lucy]

I really need to see the fourth yet.

[lawlmaster]

Never seen it never want to see it.Today's horror movies are so shitty.

[Murad136]

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Strongbow wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Murad136 wrote: Of course it will be good! It's SAW! I can't wait for it to come out!

I agree with the above post.
SAW rocks.

THANK YOU! It's got too good of a reputation and that is for a good reason!

[Iamjohn]

It isn't going too far, all of the Saw movies are really good, and the story is excellent, as each episode fits in with each other, such as in later Saw movies they go back to the first room in Saw 1, it all fits together. :3

[TheBlackDahliaMurder]

At 9/30/08 02:41 PM, lawlmaster wrote: Never seen it never want to see it.Today's horror movies are so shitty.

Saw isn't horror.

[simon]

This isn't the finale.. not yet, the sixth is the last.

[shocktherapy]

At 9/30/08 02:41 PM, Murad136 wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Strongbow wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Murad136 wrote: Of course it will be good! It's SAW! I can't wait for it to come out!

I agree with the above post.
SAW rocks.

THANK YOU! It's got too good of a reputation and that is for a good reason!

saw 1,2,3 were good but 4 was little weak and now 5 a big if 4 me

[Sekhem]

At 9/30/08 02:42 PM, simon wrote: This isn't the finale.. not yet, the sixth is the last.

they decided to stop at six? i thought i read they had like 5 more in the contract. anyways, saw was pretty much done for me when they killed jigsaw off in three. saw 4 was absolutely terrible and i walked out midway on it.

[Strongbow]

At 9/30/08 02:42 PM, TheBlackDahliaMurder wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:41 PM, lawlmaster wrote: Never seen it never want to see it.Today's horror movies are so shitty.

Saw isn't horror.

I guess it is, kinda...
Although I suppose I'd think of it as a Psychological Thriller.
I thought Saw 4 would lose it after Jigsaw and Amanda died, but they turned it around pretty well.

[KidRidikalusss]

ROAR IM A SCARY INTELLECTUAL AND IM GOING TO IMPRISON YOU PSYCHOLOGICALLY ASSUMING YOU'RE RETARDED.

Saw is another horror series created on the simple basis of making money off naive teenagers.

[BlurrythyRuler]

At 9/30/08 02:46 PM, Kerfloffle wrote: ROAR IM A SCARY INTELLECTUAL AND IM GOING TO IMPRISON YOU PSYCHOLOGICALLY ASSUMING YOU'RE RETARDED.

Saw is another horror series created on the simple basis of making money off naive teenagers.

It's not a horror, it's a thriller with blood and gore.

In a horror film, the music adds to suspense. Saw just shows them dying.

[TheBlackDahliaMurder]

At 9/30/08 02:45 PM, Strongbow wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:42 PM, TheBlackDahliaMurder wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:41 PM, lawlmaster wrote: Never seen it never want to see it.Today's horror movies are so shitty.

Saw isn't horror.

I guess it is, kinda...
Although I suppose I'd think of it as a Psychological Thriller.
I thought Saw 4 would lose it after Jigsaw and Amanda died, but they turned it around pretty well.

You're absolutely right with the Psychological Thriller. It also fits snugly under Mystery. People think it's horror simply because there is a lot of torture/gore. That really doesn't make it a horror. Although the filming style does seem similar to typical horror movies, as well as the dank, dark corridor setting.

And when he says it's because horrors are shitty today... well horror was never a good genre. It's a genre that always prided itself on having a loose plot with a lot of blood/suspense. What is there to make shitty there?

[Zen444]

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Strongbow wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:39 PM, Murad136 wrote: Of course it will be good! It's SAW! I can't wait for it to come out!

I agree with the above post.
SAW rocks.

I forgot the target audience of SAW would probably surf Newgrounds.

[Otto]

Saw has got to be one of the stupidest movies ever, but I'm glad it's there, just like that movie 'Teeth'.

[KidRidikalusss]

At 9/30/08 02:48 PM, BlurrythyRuler wrote: It's not a horror, it's a thriller with blood and gore.

In a horror film, the music adds to suspense. Saw just shows them dying.

Boy you sure refuted my argument that Saw is horrible by delving in to the spectrum of semantics.

[ShadowChao96]

I can't wait for it to come out

[Rabid-Animals]

At 9/30/08 02:41 PM, Lucy wrote: I really need to see the fourth yet.

Me too. I just lost interest after the third.

[Sekhem]

At 9/30/08 02:48 PM, TheBlackDahliaMurder wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:45 PM, Strongbow wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:42 PM, TheBlackDahliaMurder wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:41 PM, lawlmaster wrote: Never seen it never want to see it.Today's horror movies are so shitty.

Saw isn't horror.

I guess it is, kinda...
Although I suppose I'd think of it as a Psychological Thriller.
I thought Saw 4 would lose it after Jigsaw and Amanda died, but they turned it around pretty well.

You're absolutely right with the Psychological Thriller. It also fits snugly under Mystery. People think it's horror simply because there is a lot of torture/gore. That really doesn't make it a horror. Although the filming style does seem similar to typical horror movies, as well as the dank, dark corridor setting.

And when he says it's because horrors are shitty today... well horror was never a good genre. It's a genre that always prided itself on having a loose plot with a lot of blood/suspense. What is there to make shitty there?

It's not psychological horror, it's simply crime horror. Psychological horror tends to be more about the inner struggles of a person not external forces such as a maniacal serial killer. See films like Jacob's Ladder, The Tenant and games like Silent Hill.

[snapper5]

At 9/30/08 02:44 PM, Sekhem wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:42 PM, simon wrote: This isn't the finale.. not yet, the sixth is the last.

they decided to stop at six? i thought i read they had like 5 more in the contract.

i thought they were stopping at 10

that would have annoyed me

[HOLY-FUCKING-SHIT]

I thought people stopped caring about these movies. I could go on and on about how these are wrong...

[shocktherapy]

At 9/30/08 02:48 PM, TheBlackDahliaMurder wrote:

You're absolutely right with the Psychological Thriller. It also fits snugly under Mystery. People think it's horror simply because there is a lot of torture/gore. That really doesn't make it a horror. Although the filming style does seem similar to typical horror movies, as well as the dank, dark corridor setting.

maybe people just like torture and gore and screaming i mean look at hostel?

[TheBlackDahliaMurder]

At 9/30/08 02:52 PM, Kerfloffle wrote:

At 9/30/08 02:48 PM, BlurrythyRuler wrote: It's not a horror, it's a thriller with blood and gore.

In a horror film, the music adds to suspense. Saw just shows them dying.

Boy you sure refuted my argument that Saw is horrible by delving in to the spectrum of semantics.

Fine, then I'll take over. Saw's plot (all 4 combined) starts with John Kramer having his unborn son accidentally killed by a drug addict/thief. John Kramer seeks justice on him, and all others who live an unworthy life. He puts them in a situation that the person can decide to either sit there and die a horrible death, or somehow mutilate themselves to survive. And if you pay attention closely to all of the movies, he has a personal connection to every one of his test subjects somehow, usually through his ex-wife's clinic.

However, as a cancer patient, he is dying, and tries to find accomplices to continue his work after he dies.

The movie's aims are to make you think one thing, and challenge it throughout the movie, only to give you a complete surprise at the end. Saw has a strong plot. Something all horror movies lack. If you would actually watch the movies, you would know that instead of making sweeping generalizations on it based on the torture scenes that make up a minority of the movies.

[Alphabit]

I saw them all from number 2 up and they're all been great. I never watched number one because I've been told that it's 'all gore'. I liked the massive twists that they have in all the movies I've seen.

[TheBlackDahliaMurder]

At 9/30/08 02:56 PM, shocktherapy wrote: maybe people just like torture and gore and screaming i mean look at hostel?

Hostel was a steaming pile of shit. It was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. 45 minutes of boobs and sex, followed by 45 minutes of pointless torture.

Hostel II was even worse. The first half of the movie put me fucking nearly to sleep. Following 3 fuckwit girls around Europe as they indulge in the culture there? Uggh. Then the torture scenes were completely random and sporadic throughout the second half. The opening scene made no sense, and they mindlessly killed the main character of the first movie without describing anything. And the ending scene was pure shit. They cut off one of the antagonist's head, only to have a group of kids play soccer with it?

I will NEVER watch another Eli Roth movie as long as I live. I will never get those hours of my life back. Also, I've seen his movie Cabin Fever, which was even worse than the Hostel movies.

[Puzzled]

1 and 2 were good 3 was pushing it and now a 4th one?

wtf !

they are killing it :(

[ZteveSissou]

I'm probably going to enjoy saw as long as they don't lose that feel.

Who needs story?