Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/16/08 01:56 PM, zoolrule wrote: It's because the 2nd result in the search is the site JewWatch, yes we are in the 21th century.

You know, JeWatch is a catchier name.

And am I alone in expecting it to be a site listing numerous pro-Zionist rhetoric from Capitol Hill or the news media?

At 8/16/08 03:31 PM, poxpower wrote:

Yes, I get it, but why only jews?
??
What gives? There's 50 offensive sites about any given subject, why are they doing it for one group and not the others?

This is the kind of shit that makes nuts go "there's a jew conspiracy". Because sometimes, yes, there's some funky shit going on about those people. But hey what do you expect, that's the same for every religious group, they're not exempt.

Yes but if you google Chinaman you get some light jokes about how Chinese people have trouble speaking English. If you google the n word you mostly get sites that discuss the controversy surrounding the word. But if you google jew, you get:

Jew Watch
Throw the Jew Down the Well (Song, satire)
"THE INTERNATIONAL JEW - THE WORLD'S FOREMOST PROBLEM"

And Jew Watch used to be the number one search result, which was what prompted Google's reaction.

At 8/17/08 12:27 PM, Al6200 wrote:

And Jew Watch used to be the number one search result, which was what prompted Google's reaction.

Dude, though shit, Google isn't the truth patrol.
There's tons of other search terms that yield patently false bullshit results. Just look up stuff like vaccines, UFOs, 9/11,evolution.
You'll mostly get bullshit sites that are just lies and propaganda.

No idea why they would start being partial to this. This sets a dumb precedent where now it's sort of their fault for offensive bullshit being on the net??
Why would they even do that? And why only for this one subject?

Hello, my name is Irony. Can we be friends?

At 8/17/08 12:41 PM, poxpower wrote: Dude, though shit, Google isn't the truth patrol.
There's tons of other search terms that yield patently false bullshit results. Just look up stuff like vaccines, UFOs, 9/11,evolution.

They didn't censor their results though... I mean... its still up there. And as for those bullshit results, who is going to get overtly offended at vaccines, UFOs, or evolution. Sure 9/11 there might be a bit, but 9/11 isn't about a group of people, its a singular event.

The misinformation present in a search for Jews is not only unexpected (most of the time), but it offends and reminds jews of all of the previous bullshit antisemitism has caused. Its not like this is a set patern. And Jews have realised that if propaganda is let to spread and flurish as it has in the past then we're in a very sour uncomfortable position. And sometimes it involves ovens, hangings, firing squads, biological infections, etc.

As a people we've been taught to be offended by that kind of thing since day 1 because when we weren't, it spread and we paid the price.

No one has been killed from propaganda on any of those other things you named. Nor do any of them turn up overtly offensive pages calling for the destruction of a people.

No idea why they would start being partial to this. This sets a dumb precedent where now it's sort of their fault for offensive bullshit being on the net??
Why would they even do that? And why only for this one subject?

They never said it was their fault. And its a small disclaimer most people don't even see. They didn't change their results, they just added another page to the net.

Maybe they diddnt want bullshit in the Top searches for people not wanting to look up anti-jew stuf.
Its just for Convenience.

i goggled jew, and i got this =D

At 8/16/08 10:16 AM, Zoraxe7 wrote: Regular searched Jew, again, just a regular search.
hmmm

google uses a personalized search results. so the different types of things you choose when you search are reflected on future searches. if he mostly chooses offensive things about jews, he will mostly get offensive things about jews. if someone mostly chooses good things about jews, they will get mostly good things about jews. if someone doesnt look up or choose anything about jews, the first few times they will get wikipedia, and sites that pay a ton of money for adverts.

just because of the subject of this,
im not jewish, but i get fucking pissed when someone uses "jew" or any other religeon as an insult (especially when they know the person's religeon). other than wicca and the other religeons whos entire basis is being evil for no reason. but, jews mostly live good lives and dont kill, steal, or any of the other things the commandments command. (not all jews follow the commandments just like not all christians do.)

i equate people who kill other people because they have a different religeon to extremist shiite muslems. know why? because they are exactly the same. if someone else has a different releigion than yours, either try to show them why you follow the religeon you follow, or just forget about it. if it turns into a debate, dont bother. it means they are so set in their religeous beleifs (or lack thereof), that they will never change their mind unless god himself visited them in broad daylight and told them otherwise.

At 8/17/08 09:35 PM, acerose wrote:

At 8/16/08 10:16 AM, Zoraxe7 wrote: Regular searched Jew, again, just a regular search.
hmmm

google uses a personalized search results. so the different types of things you choose when you search are reflected on future searches. if he mostly chooses offensive things about jews, he will mostly get offensive things about jews. if someone mostly chooses good things about jews, they will get mostly good things about jews. if someone doesnt look up or choose anything about jews, the first few times they will get wikipedia, and sites that pay a ton of money for adverts.

Wrong. Google uses a web crawler algorithm that ranks pages based on the amount of other pages linking to them. They wrote a research paper at Sanford about it. Jew watch and wikipedia come up because they have the most pages linked to them relating to that topic. Advertizements go in banners on the top or towers on the side.

just because of the subject of this,
im not jewish, but i get fucking pissed when someone uses "jew" or any other religeon as an insult (especially when they know the person's religeon). other than wicca and the other religeons whos entire basis is being evil for no reason. but, jews mostly live good lives and dont kill, steal, or any of the other things the commandments command. (not all jews follow the commandments just like not all christians do.)

What do you have against Wicca? You believe that all wiccans are evil? I know its a whole nother topic but dude, bigot much.

At 8/16/08 10:01 AM, poxpower wrote: What the fuck is that?

Sergey Brin, one of the founders of google is a jew.

You guys know how a goolge bomb works, and why 'weapons of mass destruction', 'miserable failure' and 'french military victories' do/did get funny results right?

for some of you guys that cant find that link to the apology. It might be here.

Now we know poxpower is a closet anti-semitist.

At 8/16/08 10:01 AM, poxpower wrote: You'll get this: http://www.google.com/explanation.html

Haha... I just tried Coon, and it came up at the top with "Related Searches: Wog".
Lolwut.

At 8/17/08 01:07 PM, gumOnShoe wrote:

They didn't censor their results though... I mean... its still up there. And as for those bullshit results, who is going to get overtly offended at vaccines, UFOs, or evolution. Sure 9/11 there might be a bit, but 9/11 isn't about a group of people, its a singular event.

Ok so the argument is "if it offends people, then let's take it up the ass"?
Well they better take down every site that links to that mohammed pictures, because muslims get a LOT more offended than the Jews.
Woo let's have a crybaby contest to see who gets the most offended at things!

And poor black people, I guess they don't get offended enough to warrant apologies about the information on sites that contain a CERTAIN word.

:(

ok I'll stop now.

And Jews have realised that if propaganda is let to spread and flurish as it has in the past then we're in a very sour uncomfortable position.

I'm sorry, but it's things like this that made people hate them. They think they're owed a special priviledge and they go around causing that kind of shit instead of staying quiet and that makes everyone hate them and they're trying to make society accept that no matter what a jewish person does, it's ok because it's anti-semitic to criticize them.
That's the sort of accusation that ends a career, even if what you say against them is true. That's completely wrong and I know that right now, in the back of your head, you're thinking that I only think it's wrong because they're specifically jewish.
Hell no. Look at what muslims did. You seriously want a world where saying anything against THEM is heavily frowned upon?

Fuck no. When anyone pulls some bullshit, they deserve what's coming to them. Sadly a lot of people are trying to pull out the jew card, the race card, the native american card and so on.

Related note: I wish I had a card :,(

No one has been killed from propaganda on any of those other things you named.

Yeah no black person ever died as a result of racism. Racism today is a much smaller problem than anti-semitism too. In fact most jews really need our charity and pity, they're so downtrodden and miserable :,(
Poor Israeli army, facing all those kids with rocks with only a few battalion of Abraham tanks.

And its a small disclaimer most people don't even see.

I don't know how many people can see it, but it's the very first thing you get when you do the search and it popped right out at me because I've never seen anything like it before.
They're apologizing for something they didn't do, that isn't their fault and that they have no right to correct if they don't correct other things.

Sorry, it's just that first little step to facism, and WE KNOW WHERE THAT LEADS AMIRIGHT
Google is AWESOME, I just find it a pity that they'd do something that vain.

At 8/19/08 04:16 PM, poxpower wrote:

Is it just me or is Jew the only non offensive word that gets hostile results-even more so than hostile words.

Black people:
Black People Love Us!
The Top 10 Rock Songs Black People Love, A Post Written By A Black ...
Stuff Black People Love

Sand Ni**er:
Madhab al-Irfy: Yes, Jesus was indeed a "sand ni**er" ...
Urban dictionary
Poets.org - Poetry, Poems, Bios & More - Sand Ni**er

Poems, related to jesus, a dictionary?

Arab:
Arab - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Arab News Newspaper
[ arab net ] - :: Always Leading The Way ::

Canadian:
Canadian Bacon (1995)
SECRETLY CANADIAN
Canadian English - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and this one

Not many offensive results on the front page with either hostile or neutral terms except for Jew. Maybe they're the only ones who are owed an apology, and that's why they're the only ones who got one.

At 8/17/08 12:47 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: Hello, my name is Irony. Can we be friends?

those tight ropes news guys are racist.

At 8/19/08 04:16 PM, poxpower wrote:

Related note: I wish I had a card :,(

the french canadian card?

must be worth somethin at least more then the english canadian card

At 8/16/08 10:01 AM, poxpower wrote: Now try it with any other offensive word you can think of.

lol pox... "Jew" is an offensive word now?

At 8/19/08 04:16 PM, poxpower wrote:

stuff

1) Nothing has been sensored from the results for jew
2) I was addressing these terms: vaccines, UFOs, 9/11,evolution. Not black, n______, etc.
3) As has been stated, Jew is not meant to be a negative term and thats the difference.

Name another word with a positive conotation that frequently results in hate sites and we'll continue this.

At 8/19/08 04:16 PM, poxpower wrote: I'm sorry, but it's things like this that made people hate them. They think they're owed a special priviledge and they go around causing that kind of shit instead of staying quiet and that makes everyone hate them and they're trying to make society accept that no matter what a jewish person does, it's ok because it's anti-semitic to criticize them.

People don't hate them because they think they're owed a special favour, they're the most hated group of all time. Black peoples persecution is nothing in comparison to the 4000 years of suffering the jewish race as faced. The Slave trade was like going to disneyland compared to the oppression, suffering, starvation, forced labour, racial hatred etc. Everyone from ancient Egyptians to the british have persecuted Jews so I think they get to complain a bit, they bearly go on about it compared to blacks who bring up racist arrests every day, even though the chance of the police, the judge and the jury all being racist is pretty much impossible -__-

At 8/16/08 03:31 PM, poxpower wrote:

At 8/16/08 03:24 PM, Al6200 wrote: I fail to see the problem. Google is a company and they're just protecting themselves from criticism by insulting anti-Jewish sites but not actually censoring their search content.

Yes, I get it, but why only jews?
??
What gives? There's 50 offensive sites about any given subject, why are they doing it for one group and not the others?

BOTH creators of google are Jews. And one of the moved from Russia to The United States because of Russian anti-semitism.

At 8/20/08 01:12 AM, gumOnShoe wrote:

Name another word with a positive conotation that frequently results in hate sites and we'll continue this.

Chinaman.

At 8/16/08 09:20 PM, therealsylvos wrote: Because N*gger is inherently demeaning.
As is kike gook, etc.
However you get an antisemitic site by typing "Jew" a not inherently antisemitic word

That being said Jews are whiny pussies.

You're right on both counts.

At 8/16/08 03:31 PM, poxpower wrote: Yes, I get it, but why only jews?

It was a response to a particular controversy that involved a particular jewish hate site.

http://www.adl.org/rumors/google_search_
rumors.asp

Thus, it only addresses jews, because it's only addressing this controversy.

At 8/20/08 01:12 AM, gumOnShoe wrote: 2) I was addressing these terms: vaccines, UFOs, 9/11,evolution. Not black, n______, etc.

Well, if people would listen to anti-evolution-propaganda, we might very well die from lack of medicine. What to do when the viruses evolve? We don't believe in it, so we can't get medicine for it. Especially not since evolution is a major part of making new medicines, or new types of food.

At 8/19/08 09:12 PM, Earthshine wrote:

those tight ropes news guys are racist.

Thank you, Captain Obvious. We would have never figured that our if you hadn't pointed it out to us, despite the racist headline and completely bigoted website.