At 8/14/08 12:45 AM, SpammyMcGee wrote:
It's not my fault you can't take criticism, you dumb bitch.
I can take criticism very well, actually. I don't particularly care for irrelevant or unrelated criticism, but even that has merit to the open-minded.
Let us examine what you call "criticism," shall we?
At 8/13/08 10:17 PM, SpammyMcGee wrote:
Why are you trying so hard to be a weeaboo?
This is criticism regarding a lifestyle choice, I think. I had to look it up to find out what a weeaboo was, but when I read the description from encyclopedia dramatica, it made me chuckle, I can tell you. I am an American. My parents are American citizens and by birth, so am I. I have no intention of elaborating further. Suffice it to say that reading Japanese literature and comics is something that I happen to practice on a daily basis. If being bilingual (trilingual if you count the Spanish major I'm pursuing in college right now) makes me a Weeaboo in your "criticism," then I won't deny it. I will say though, that you are quick to judge others and quick to attack more than just faulty artistic technique in your reviews. That's a bit of criticism I offer to you.
At 8/13/08 10:17 PM, SpammyMcGee wrote:
:You even make your comics read left to right like all shitty Mangas.
The shitty manga aren't the only ones that do this. The quality ones do too. Mine, however, falls under the shitty category, so I won't begrudge you that. This comment wasn't particularly constructive, since it did nothing more than elucidate a bias toward one method of guiding the reader through the comic. Just the same, I will take your comment into consideration.
At 8/13/08 10:17 PM, SpammyMcGee wrote:
Whatever, the drawings are basic and I hate comic strips that are about 10 panels long.
Here is the only semi-relevant bit of criticism that I was able to glean from your sparse comments. I feel I should explain something, though. Crayon Shinchan is a series that uses basic and childish figures as its modus operandi. It is about a five-year old child who is the equivalent of a Dennis the Menace from Hell, and the drawing style is meant to reflect the childishness of not only the brat himself, but his parents and teachers as well. It's crude and pocked with toilet humor, but it delivers a humorous dig at the childishness of adults as well.
As for the length, that too is a by-product of the style of this series.
I make no claims about the quality of this "work" of mine; I only dislike being given baseless insults and opinions under the guise of constructive criticism. Pointing out flaws and criticizing weak points is all part of the game, and being able to accept that and learn from it is vital to anyone who wants to improve. I understand that.
My only question is, do you?
Sorry to prattle on about this. The subject of criticism is a touchy one with me, since I give it sparingly but thoroughly whenever I can. I review for the purpose of helping the reviewee improve, not to just state my opinions and prejudices as though they were facts.