Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

you do realize that 90% of the time the republicans are right, right? Lets look at congress all the dems do is point out flaws in the plans, they dont actually have their own idea on how to fix those flaws... it gets annoying after a while.

At 7/24/08 01:02 PM, callofdutyfreak wrote: you do realize that 90% of the time the republicans are right, right? Lets look at congress all the dems do is point out flaws in the plans, they dont actually have their own idea on how to fix those flaws... it gets annoying after a while.

Point out some examples as to why republicans are "right" 90% of the time. That is a pretty bigotted statement that needs proof as to why republicans can make all the "right" decisions you say.

And if by "right" you mean "enabling human progress", then they are wrong 90% of the time.

At 7/24/08 01:10 PM, misterDAK wrote:

At 7/24/08 01:02 PM, callofdutyfreak wrote: you do realize that 90% of the time the republicans are right, right? Lets look at congress all the dems do is point out flaws in the plans, they dont actually have their own idea on how to fix those flaws... it gets annoying after a while.

Point out some examples as to why republicans are "right" 90% of the time. That is a pretty bigotted statement that needs proof as to why republicans can make all the "right" decisions you say.

And if by "right" you mean "enabling human progress", then they are wrong 90% of the time.

Ha! Republicans are RIGHT 100% of the time. Right wing that is. Oh, you meant facts? Well, while CODfreak can not prove that they are right 90% of the time, you can't prove that they are "wrong" 90% of the time either. First off, the word is too simple to apply to a set of ideas, second off, both of you are BSing. Don't call someone out for making a idiotic claim and then go on to make your own idiotic claim.

At 7/24/08 01:10 PM, misterDAK wrote: And if by "right" you mean "enabling human progress", then they are wrong 90% of the time.

LOL. You say that as if politicians from other parties are any better.

At 7/25/08 01:05 AM, dySWN wrote: LOL. You say that as if politicians from other parties are any better.

Not really. But I know well how the republican party functions.

c'mon guys, this kid's a 13 yr old homophobe... you're taking crap from him? lol.
i'm surprised he doesn't like the republicans himself. he probably tries to pretend he's an anarchist punk or some bs at school.

isn't that right lil boy?

At 7/25/08 02:33 AM, misterDAK wrote:

At 7/25/08 01:05 AM, dySWN wrote: LOL. You say that as if politicians from other parties are any better.

Not really. But I know well how the republican party functions.

And how would you know that? The media is not a good resource on these things, and unless you're a savvy congressional insider I sincerely doubt you're privy to any knowledge that the rest of us aren't in regards to ANY of the major parties.

At 7/25/08 01:00 PM, dySWN wrote: And how would you know that? The media is not a good resource on these things, and unless you're a savvy congressional insider I sincerely doubt you're privy to any knowledge that the rest of us aren't in regards to ANY of the major parties.

Well, besides me being of gifted intelligence (I also believe only smart people should vote) I can see the patterns in the party. They are very stagnant. This doesn't mean they always are, but nonetheless republicans tend to be the guardians of the status quo.

At 7/26/08 01:03 AM, misterDAK wrote: Well, besides me being of gifted intelligence (I also believe only smart people should vote)

Since when did they lower the bar of intelligence to encompass those with an IQ of 70? No, you don't know anything anymore than the rest of us. The simple-fact is the political parties are not hive-minded, meaning you'll come across a great diversity of opinion within each group.

At 7/26/08 02:15 AM, Zeistro wrote: Since when did they lower the bar of intelligence to encompass those with an IQ of 70? No, you don't know anything anymore than the rest of us. The simple-fact is the political parties are not hive-minded, meaning you'll come across a great diversity of opinion within each group.

Well too bad you don't actually know me other than a few posts I've made. So shut up and fight above the belt (if you respond to this I'll just assume you still want to fight dirty).

And no, there is not much diversity within parties. That's why they are parties. If there was too much difference, the party would not be able to assemble and fight in the election. Republican party, democratic party, they both organize along ideas to battle in an election.

Break down the parties and you will see a new era in free thinking politics and a big blow against American burocracy (I don't think I spelt that right).

At 7/26/08 01:03 AM, misterDAK wrote: Well, besides me being of gifted intelligence

Maybe so, but...

:(I also believe only smart people should vote).

...and you lost me.

At 7/26/08 03:05 AM, misterDAK wrote:

:American burocracy (I don't think I spelt that right).

It's ok it's bureaucracy. Luckily they don't require a spelling test to vote Mr. Wizard.

At 7/26/08 03:05 AM, misterDAK wrote: Well too bad you don't actually know me other than a few posts I've made.

And from what I've seen it doesn't do you any justice.

So shut up and fight above the belt (if you respond to this I'll just assume you still want to fight dirty).

Calling someone stupid or even joking about it isn't fighting dirty. I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings with my jest, but that may be due to your own insecurity about your intelligence.

And no, there is not much diversity within parties.

Umm, yes there is. You have people such individuals such as Zell Miller on one end of the political spectrum Bernie Sanders on the other. Both of which are caucused with democrats. The same could be said about Barr(now a libertarian) and DeMint.

That's why they are parties.

I think you misunderstand the purpose of political parties.

If there was too much difference, the party would not be able to assemble and fight in the election.

Sorry dude, but they're allowed their diversity of opinion. The point of political parties is not to gather a cabal of like-minded individuals, but more along the lines of accomplishing a national precedent. For example, there may be both liberal and conservative republicans who completely differ on social issues, but they band in order to advance free-market economics.

Republican party, democratic party, they both organize along ideas to battle in an election.

Yes, but not everyone in the party agrees on every single issue. You saying otherwise is flat-out fallacious

Break down the parties and you will see a new era in free thinking politics and a big blow against American burocracy (I don't think I spelt that right).

You misused the word bureaucracy.

i now its funny how alot of people in the usa like there leaders to make things hard on people like them
for some strange reson lots of people in amrica like to treated like worthless shit where that stuipid...

At 7/26/08 10:51 PM, gunner-564 wrote: i now its funny how alot of people in the usa like there leaders to make things hard on people like them
for some strange reson lots of people in amrica like to treated like worthless shit where that stuipid...

Let me translate.

I know it is funny how a lot of people in the USA like their leaders to make things hard on people. For some strange reason a lot of people in America like to be treated like worthless shit, we're that stupid......

Actually Gunner you just proved you are retarded.

At 7/26/08 10:55 PM, hrb5711 wrote: Let me translate.

Okay; now I understand what was said but the meaning still doesn't connect. Did he mean something about one particular group or American politics as a whole?

I think he's saying that he doesn't understand why people wouldn't elect politicians who promise to wait on hand and foot for their people, rather than letting them fend for themselfs... Basically, doesn't get why republicans want the government to be 'hard' on them.

A few reasons

1) You'll spoil your 'childeren', and set their standards at unreasonably high levels
2) government services require money, which equals taxes... most people don't like paying taxes.
3) personal ethic of self reliance, Free healthcare was never considered the 'american dream' earning money in your own right, however, was.

At 7/23/08 04:42 AM, WolvenBear wrote:

At 7/20/08 07:43 PM, JoxskornerStudios01 wrote:

5. Let your country fall into a depression.

The country isn't in a recession, let alone a depression. The economy is still growing thanks.

I hate to tell you this, but we are in a recession. Gas prices have been going up, and so has food prices. And lets not forget about our house values as well. Yep, we are NOT having a recession...

At 7/29/08 02:25 AM, T-N-T wrote: I hate to tell you this, but we are in a recession. Gas prices have been going up, and so has food prices. And lets not forget about our house values as well. Yep, we are NOT having a recession...

We AREN'T having a recession. If teh economy is growing, a recession is impossible. It's like saying you're losing money while your bank account is growing.

Recession=2 quarters of negative growth. We haven't had a month of negative growth,
As I said. No recession. Shut it.

You understand NOTHING of the Republican party. I am so sick of you fuckin' liberals spending your time trying to expose Republicans, so much to an extent that you don't realize you live in a bullshit fairy tale where everyone is happy. Grow the fuck up.

At 7/29/08 02:38 AM, WolvenBear wrote:

We AREN'T having a recession. If teh economy is growing, a recession is impossible. It's like saying you're losing money while your bank account is growing.

Recession=2 quarters of negative growth. We haven't had a month of negative growth,
As I said. No recession. Shut it.

I don't think you read my text very clearly.

At 7/29/08 02:38 AM, WolvenBear wrote: We AREN'T having a recession. If teh economy is growing, a recession is impossible. It's like saying you're losing money while your bank account is growing.

Recession=2 quarters of negative growth. We haven't had a month of negative growth,
As I said. No recession. Shut it.

The economy isn't growing, that's inflation doing its job.

GDP is good if you want to look at consumer spending and nothing more. People haven't come to terms that they should live within their means so this just means the Federal Reserve has to print more money to cover the debt which loses the purchasing power of the dollar.

At 7/29/08 02:25 AM, T-N-T wrote: I hate to tell you this, but we are in a recession. Gas prices have been going up, and so has food prices. And lets not forget about our house values as well. Yep, we are NOT having a recession...

HAH, you wouldn't know a recession if it hit you in the face. If this is a recession, it's the mildest one I've ever heard of, merely a technical recession. This is the kind that not many people give a fuck about.

I mean, I'm not rich, and I'm not feeling a whole lot of hurt from this economic slump. My apartment still costs the same to rent, and I don't really use my car to get around much. If high gas prices bother you, just can it and find another way to get to work. If your home isn't valuable right now, chances are you probably don't have to sell it until the housing market goes back up like it always does.

Gas prices have been going up because worldwide demand has skyrocketed. Nations like India and China are experincing huge economic growth and they need gas (among other things) to maintain that growth. Not to mention that there hasn't been a new gas refinery built in this country in over 30 years and the gov't won't let oil companies drill in places we know there's a signifigant anount of oil to be found (ANWR, offshore, the dakotas, ect).
Food prices are going up partly because of the increase in fuel prices. Another is ethanol. The gov't is really pushing it as an alternative fuel source. In the US, ethanol is made from corn. As a result the demand for corn has gone way up. The price per bushel has tripled since the gov't started this ethanol business (it's around 8$/bushel now). A lot of food products on the market are made with corn or corn products. Not to mention that corn is used to make feed for farm animals.

At 7/22/08 03:50 AM, freddorfman wrote: republicans are a virus and the cure is logic and freedom

Let me guess, by logic and freedom you mean forcing everyone into Communism (slavery and live in fear of the government's organized terrorism like what good ol' Lenin did)

Republican suck ass and they will be barred from elections for the next 2-400 years, its the green party n democrat's turn.
But really if they want to put up a fight n try to enslave us more then they already have, we'll bitchslap their asses.
But likely they won't dare fuck with us anymore seeing as they are walking on a thread between their billions for their world domination plan and 9 million angry American gun owners, including all the allies of America who are fed up with the corrupt government.

If in the event the government falls apart, I'm sure our allies will come to our aid n put us back together to the best of funtion.

At 7/30/08 04:17 AM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote: Republican suck ass and they will be barred from elections for the next 2-400 years, its the green party n democrat's turn.

Where do you get this stuff? And why do you keep trying to pass it off as fact?

At 7/29/08 11:34 PM, Oblivia wrote:

At 7/22/08 03:50 AM, freddorfman wrote: republicans are a virus and the cure is logic and freedom

Let me guess, by logic and freedom you mean forcing everyone into Communism (slavery and live in fear of the government's organized terrorism like what good ol' Lenin did)

wrong thats what stalin did lenin was the best example of communism working lenin was the best communist next to comrade fidel and communism is not slavery or organized terror thats stalinism
or capitiaism GLORY TO LENIN!

At 7/30/08 05:29 PM, freddorfman wrote: wrong thats what stalin did lenin was the best example of communism working lenin was the best communist next to comrade fidel and communism is not slavery or organized terror thats stalinism
or capitiaism GLORY TO LENIN!

Tyranny is the only way to have communism. If Lenin wasn't going to forcefully steal everyone's money then no one would pay and communism would crumble.

At 7/29/08 12:57 PM, T-N-T wrote: I don't think you read my text very clearly.

I did. You're still stupid. I ignored your irrelevancies.

A man goes to his doctor and says "I have AIDS." The doctor asks if he has fallen ill recently. The man says "Yea, I got a cold, but I'm ok now." The doctor concludes he doesn't have AIDS. The man points out he stubbed his toe...and the doctor still concludes he doesn't have AIDS.

Recession is a clearly defined term. We are not in one. The fact that you don't give a damn that we have growth shows you to be an economic illiterate and a hack to boot!

At 7/29/08 03:28 PM, CIX wrote: The economy isn't growing, that's inflation doing its job.

No the economy is growing. It's cool. You have no clue what the hell you're talking about. Back to silence?

GDP is good if you want to look at consumer spending and nothing more. People haven't come to terms that they should live within their means so this just means the Federal Reserve has to print more money to cover the debt which loses the purchasing power of the dollar.

Holy crap, you're a moron.

At 7/30/08 04:17 AM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote: Republican suck ass....

And yet the Democrats have done more damage in 2 years than they did in 14 years. Well, crap.