"I believe these children are far too young to be learning about what these issues mean," said Alaina Stewart
It's okay for children to learn about heterosexual couples and families but not homosexual ones? That doesn't make any sense!! There's nothing wrong with children knowing about the different types of relationships that exist. Knowing about things like this from a young age and being taught that it's not something that people should be discriminated for should make for a friendlier future toward homosexuals.
"By not allowing kids to opt out," says David Kirwin, who has two children in the system, "the school district is violating a First Amendment right for those who have a religion that doesn't support homosexuality."
As far as I know, no religion explicitly states that homosexuals should not be considered with the same respect as any other person. Christianity is the main one I can think of that takes issue with homosexuality, but that's very complicated and the derived message has more to do with subjective judgements and what the person wants the message to be. Jesus said to love and accept everyone, Leviticus said a bunch of crazy shit, etc etc. Therefore, not being supportive of homosexuality is a personal belief and not a strictly religious belief. I love how Christians like to hide behind religion as a justification for hate and discrimination. Commit a hate crime? Claim religion compelled you!!
The move toward the new curriculum began two years ago, when teachers noticed that even kindergarten students were using derogatory words about sexuality, such as "fag."
Wow! Sounds like the curriculum to raise awareness and increase acceptance is definitely needed!
The book has been banned in some areas of the country.
The backward areas where most people probably couldn't even read a book in the first place.
duhhh ban knowledge and information plz becuz dis stuff is badd.
teachers are responsible for creating an environment where students can feel comfortable and learn.
So true.
England said she believes Alameda's curriculum committee has purposely excluded religion, even though it is one of the protected classes. "This indicates an agenda is being pushed
Religion is not supposed to be taught in schools. The school is having a problem with bullying and lack of acceptance for homosexual lifestyles, not a problem having to do with religion. It wouldn't make sense to teach about religion as a solution to this problem. Damn straight an agenda is being pushed! The agenda is the mental and physical well-being of children in the school and to help children feel more accepted so they can learn better!
I love how the guy who said the above claimed there are five categories of protected classes when it comes to discrimination, and then went on to only point out religion, meanwhile complaining that sexual orientation was specifically being protected. What about the other three, guy?? Oh wait you only care about religion? Okay then.
And I hate Fox News.