You 16 year olds are pathetic!

[Phsyco-Mantis]

Bad grammar and bad spelling. Crappy creativity. It pisses me off that I am better than most 16 year olds when it comes to intellect.

I actually put effort in punctuation and paragraphing. You know, to make it easier to read.

It pisses me off when fellow 16 year olds mistakingly say (or in this case, write) "me and my friend," rather than the proper way, "My friend and I."

Also, the Japanese movie "Casshern" is an awsome movie. It dates in the late 21st century (2070-2090) where a 50 year old war has just ended. Leaving a destroyed land in it's footsteps, mankind is on the brink of extinction. With disease and radiation, and toxic environments, mankind is slowly dying. The discovery of a new type of organism, "Neo-Cell" is able to become any tissue and is able to reproduct proactively. When an experiment goes wrong, the bodies of dead soldiers found in zone 7 come back alive, creating a new breed of mutants that call themselves Neo-Sapiens.

The fallen soldier, Tetsuya, becomes ressurected when his father, the founder of Neo-Cells, plunges Tetsuya's body into the pool of Neo-Cells. Becoming a Neo-Sapien himself, Tetsuya possesses new powers. His speed, strength and agility become enhanced.

Among the mutants, only 4 had survived when a mass genocide was ordered. These 4 seek to destroy the humans for wanting to destroy them. Ironically, Neo-Cells could only be harnessed through "Original-Humans" and thus, the "Neo-Sapiens" are actually original humans. And so, the battle between Tetsuya, who now calls himself "Casshern" fights another war.

Way to chalantly change the subject.

[Jaketheclonetrooper]

That would be "awesome" not "awsome"

[SleepyFox]

You were 16 once too.

[Phsyco-Mantis]

Also, picture.

[Kid]

At 5/25/08 05:24 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: It pisses me off when fellow 16 year olds mistakingly say (or in this case, write) "me and my friend," rather than the proper way, "My friend and I."

You do know that "me and my friend" is the proper way in some situations, right?

[RedCoin]

And you still manage to be uninteresting.

[Jacked-Off-Lantern]

At 5/25/08 05:26 AM, Jaketheclonetrooper wrote: That would be "awesome" not "awsome"

Aww... Beat me to it.

[Phsyco-Mantis]

At 5/25/08 05:26 AM, Jaketheclonetrooper wrote: That would be "awesome" not "awsome"

Can you kill a guy for not pressing "e" when he was supposed to?

[RedCoin]

Also, it doesn't take great intelligence to know that you should stick to one topic in a thread.
You clicked on 'post a topic' not 'post two topics, totally irrelevant to each other.'

[Phsyco-Mantis]

At 5/25/08 05:35 AM, RedCoin wrote: Also, it doesn't take great intelligence to know that you should stick to one topic in a thread.
You clicked on 'post a topic' not 'post two topics, totally irrelevant to each other.'

This is why I say I chalantly changed the subject.

[KingPaulP]

At 5/25/08 05:33 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote:

At 5/25/08 05:26 AM, Jaketheclonetrooper wrote: That would be "awesome" not "awsome"

Can you kill a guy for not pressing "e" when he was supposed to?

You can when he is preaching about how good he is, even more so if it is the thing he claims to be so much more superior at.

Irony much?

[Trinidex]

You have a long post with reasonable punctuation and spelling. Therefore your argument that all 16 years olds are idiots must be correct.

Fuck off.

[Ben]

I nonchalantly don't give a fuck about what you have to say.

[Gatling]

You can't even spell "psycho" right, so STFU!

[Benjovi]

This 15 year old is a little jealous. :I

[homor]

ah, unwarrented and undeserved elitism.

[Kid]

At 5/25/08 05:33 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: Can you kill a guy for not pressing "e" when he was supposed to?

It's not just that, or any of the other spelling/grammatical errors in your post. The biggest problem with this thread is the fact that it is structured horribly. You worded a few of those sentences strangely. Just because you put your thoughts into some kind of paragraph format doesn't mean you actually understand how to compose a paragraph, or even a sentence. You've still got quite a way to go. Hell, you even started your post with a sentence fragment.

Some examples:

"It pisses me off that I am better than most 16 year olds when it comes to intellect." I can't even think of a way to rephrase this using your original words or ideas, since it's basically saying "I'm better at intellect" Maybe something like "It annoys me that I am more intellectual than most 16 year olds" would do the trick.

"It dates in the late 21st century" should be "It dates to the late 21st century" or something along those lines. Even better would be "It takes place in the 21st century" or "It is set in the 21st century" or "Its setting is the 21st century."

"where a 50 year old war" should be "where a 50 year war" or "where a 50 year long war" or something along those lines. When you say something is "old" you're usually speaking about something that was created at one point: "5 year old cat" "20 year old man" "15 year old car" "50 year old theory." It's not really right to use "old" to describe an event that takes place over a period of time.

[Phsyco-Mantis]

At 5/25/08 05:58 AM, Kid wrote: Stuff

I love you. Want to have sex?

I haven't slept yet.

[Objection]

At 5/25/08 06:03 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote:

At 5/25/08 05:58 AM, Kid wrote: Stuff

I love you. Want to have sex?

I haven't slept yet.

Are you gay?

[MattHarty]

Mantis got grammatically raped in this thread. I didn't even think that was possible.

[xXMajuniorXx]

At 5/25/08 05:24 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote:

You 16 year olds are pathetic!

lol k

Crappy creativity.

If making a thread for the sole purpose of boosting your ego is your idea of "creativity", okay then.

I actually put effort in punctuation and paragraphing. You know, to make it easier to read.

Hitting enter twice doesn't require effort, nor does a little puncuation.

It pisses me off when fellow 16 year olds mistakingly say (or in this case, write) "me and my friend," rather than the proper way, "My friend and I."

If that pisses you off, you should get out more.

<a load of irrelevant shite in hopes of "tl;dr" responses to attack>

Way to chalantly change the subject.

Congrats on that.

[satanbrain]

At 5/25/08 05:24 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: It pisses me off when fellow 16 year olds mistakingly say (or in this case, write) "me and my friend," rather than the proper way, "My friend and I."

who care from the proper way?

[megaepiclulz]

Well if this isn't a perfect example of tl;dr, I honestly can't say what is.

[Kid]

At 5/25/08 05:58 AM, Kid wrote: "where a 50 year old war" should be "where a 50 year war" or "where a 50 year long war" or something along those lines. When you say something is "old" you're usually speaking about something that was created at one point: "5 year old cat" "20 year old man" "15 year old car" "50 year old theory." It's not really right to use "old" to describe an event that takes place over a period of time.

I'd like to clarify this point, just to make sure you understand what I was getting at.

The term "old" is used to specify the age of something, or how long it has been around. So if a war lasted 5 years, but occurred 20 years ago, you could technically call it "the 20 year old 5 year war."

Now, I assumed in your original post that by "where a 50 year old war" you meant the length of the war was 50 years. As I have not seen this movie, I realized that the way you worded it could have been taken two ways:

1. If you did mean the war lasted 50 years, then I was correct and you were wrong.

2. If you meant the war was fought between armies that were composed of people primarily around the age of 50, then "a 50 year old war" could be a correct way of describing it.

Then there's a third possibility of "a 50 year old war" being a war that took place 50 years ago, but since you said it "just ended" this definition doesn't fit. But I'm including it in this explanation just to let you know of a third possibility of the meaning of the phrase "a 50 year old war."

[Bolo]

The fact that you referenced any form of Japanese "art," renders any credibility that might have been lurking beneath the plain exterior of your post, absolutely, and totally moot.

[satanbrain]

At 5/25/08 06:14 AM, megaepiclulz wrote: Well if this isn't a perfect example of tl;dr, I honestly can't say what is.

yes you can, it's shit

[Phsyco-Mantis]

At 5/25/08 06:04 AM, Objection wrote:

At 5/25/08 06:03 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote:

At 5/25/08 05:58 AM, Kid wrote: Stuff

I love you. Want to have sex?

I haven't slept yet.

Are you gay?

On certain occasions. Sometimes I just cry like a puppy.

Life is hard when you are depressed. You can't always be happy.

[greenfaerie4]

At 5/25/08 06:04 AM, MattHarty wrote: Mantis got grammatically raped in this thread. I didn't even think that was possible.

Well if you're going to rant about spelling and grammar errors then I suppose the post you are ranting about that in should be clear of those errors, wouldn't you say?

[KoLdBLooD]

At 5/25/08 05:24 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: Bad grammar and bad spelling. Crappy creativity. It pisses me off that I am better than most 16 year olds when it comes to intellect.

With disease and radiation, and toxic environments, mankind is slowly dying.

You can't use the word "and" after a comma.

[yurgenburgen]

At 5/25/08 05:24 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: Bad grammar and bad spelling. It pisses me off that I am better than most 16 year olds when it comes to intellect.

You spelled "Psycho" wrong in your own username.