If China Went To War With The Usa

[Stomer]

Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

[Onepiece285]

even though China has the largest military in the worls, the United States has the best military in the world.

[MojoFilter]

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: America's army are incredibly inempt

You base this off what? Nothing, I assume?

[Truth]

USA depends too much on China to engage in warfare with them

[Stomer]

At 5/24/08 09:23 PM, Jezuz wrote: In our current state there would be very little hope for China. We'd merely aim our nuke reserves at them and say to pull their troops off our soil and they'd oblige.

Then they would merely aim there's at you and say to leave the nukes out.

[Jizzlebang]

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Am I confused because you think China has a more powerful military force than the U.S, or because you think Britain does?

I mean, c'mon.

[Stomer]

At 5/24/08 09:29 PM, Jizzlebang wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Am I confused because you think China has a more powerful military force than the U.S, or because you think Britain does?

I mean, c'mon.

America is powerful, but your soliders are incredibly retarded and ill trained. That's what you get for having the bulk of your army being southerner redneck hillbillies.

[jewdudewtf]

At 5/24/08 09:22 PM, Truth wrote: USA depends too much on China to engage in warfare with them

And vise-versa!

[Stomer]

At 5/24/08 09:30 PM, Jezuz wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:27 PM, Stomer wrote:

Then they would merely aim there's at you and say to leave the nukes out.

We're both logical nations. Besides, we're in a better position to attack from ground either way. We can nuke key military areas of theirs considering they all are at home, they'd merely be killing civilians or Iraqis.

America doesn't have a problem with nuking civilians or bombing iraqi civilians, we all know that, so why should they?

[Seriana]

The US will never go to war with China, half our economy is based there.

[Phobotech]

Their army may be the largest in size, but they only have one gun for every third soldier.

I'd be more worried about their Sukhoi's going up against anything that wasn't an F-22 or F-35.

...Plus even though we got the best Navy, I don't even have a thought of what the Chinese Navy comprises...

[uhnoesanoob]

At 5/24/08 09:31 PM, Stomer wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:29 PM, Jizzlebang wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Am I confused because you think China has a more powerful military force than the U.S, or because you think Britain does?

I mean, c'mon.

America is powerful, but your soliders are incredibly retarded and ill trained. That's what you get for having the bulk of your army being southerner redneck hillbillies.

Wow, way to base things off of sterotypes asshole. I am sure your british troops do a great job though... oh wait a tic, the ONE AREA in Iraq that they had to defend turned into a nightmare.....

[Epica]

At 5/24/08 09:34 PM, Phobotech wrote: Their army may be the largest in size, but they only have one gun for every third soldier.

I'd be more worried about their Sukhoi's going up against anything that wasn't an F-22 or F-35.

...Plus even though we got the best Navy, I don't even have a thought of what the Chinese Navy comprises...

You don't have the 'best' navy, you've got the largest.

[Phobotech]

At 5/24/08 09:31 PM, jewdudewtf wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:22 PM, Truth wrote: USA depends too much on China to engage in warfare with them

And vise-versa!

Ergot, NO WAR!

Now let's all go watch the Olympics!

[Elios]

Honestly, i think China would win. For one, China provides alot of manufactured goods to America. Including weapons (possibly, i'm not sure). Cutting off these supply lines would be disaterous. Second, China has already infiltrated the US. How many Chinese are there in America? A million? And how many Americans are in China? I'd guess maybe, 90,000. If a bunch of cave-dwelling terrorists can pull of an attack on New York City, i can't imagine what millons of chinese people could accomplish. Kinda scary to think about really...

[Why993]

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: America's army are incredibly inempt

Grammer and spelling is your friend. And you ever hear of the U.S.M.C.?

"n00b pwned, sir"

[Epica]

At 5/24/08 09:35 PM, uhnoesanoob wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:31 PM, Stomer wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:29 PM, Jizzlebang wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Am I confused because you think China has a more powerful military force than the U.S, or because you think Britain does?

I mean, c'mon.

America is powerful, but your soliders are incredibly retarded and ill trained. That's what you get for having the bulk of your army being southerner redneck hillbillies.

Wow, way to base things off of sterotypes asshole. I am sure your british troops do a great job though... oh wait a tic, the ONE AREA in Iraq that they had to defend turned into a nightmare.....

That's what you hear from your corrupt American press, the Americans are the ones who fuck everything up over there. The British are the ones fighting effectively.

I think your forgetting Britain is smaller than Texas alone, what do you expect us to do, we have a very small amount of active troops compared to you, and you started the whole fucking thing in the first place. We aren't going to do ALL of your dirty work for you.

[Gamemeister128bit]

At 5/24/08 09:34 PM, DragonsGrief wrote: The US will never go to war with China, half our economy is based there.

Isn't that the beauty of it though? Coming from a completely immoral standpoint, winning China would do wonders for the economy. This is ignoring the nuclear wasteland that both sides do not want.

[Epica]

At 5/24/08 09:37 PM, Why993 wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: America's army are incredibly inempt

Grammer and spelling is your friend. And you ever hear of the U.S.M.C.?

"n00b pwned, sir"

US Marines, skilled compared to the Royal Marines? HAHAHAHAHAHA

I mean....HAHAHAHAHA

AHAHAHA

[mastershake141]

At 5/24/08 09:37 PM, Elios wrote: Second, China has already infiltrated the US. How many Chinese are there in America? A million?

All orientals living in america are sleeper cells

all of them.

[Phobotech]

At 5/24/08 09:35 PM, Epica wrote:

You don't have the 'best' navy, you've got the largest.

Dude, I'm not even doing it for pride or country, we HAVE the best-trained, best-equipped (and yes, largest Navy.)

I would've even given us the best Air Force, but I'm surrendering that one to the Israeli's.

If we don't have the best Navy, than who does, and try to back it up, sir. For all you know, you could be teaching me something I didn't know.

[NeonFlame126]

At 5/24/08 09:31 PM, Stomer wrote: America is powerful, but your soliders are incredibly retarded and ill trained. That's what you get for having the bulk of your army being southerner redneck hillbillies.

Sure, go to West Point, or Annapolis, or wherever the fuck Air Force is. You wouldn't last the training they have there. At West Point to get year round training, from basic to special ops, and everything in between. In Annapolis we have to finish a nearly mile long obstacle course in under 5minutes to even get in. More year round training from spotting ships, to firing AA guns to submarine training. I don't know much about Air Force, but it's still pretty fucking tough to even get in. You need to ace nearly every class in school and to be recommended by a Senator and two other authority figures as well to get in[goes for all military]. We have some of the best, if not THE BEST weapons in the world, and the best sharpshooters to use them.

[mastershake141]

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote:

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Also, where the hell do you get these facts? I don't believe britain has EVER had better trained forces than America.

[Epica]

At 5/24/08 09:40 PM, Phobotech wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:35 PM, Epica wrote:

You don't have the 'best' navy, you've got the largest.

Dude, I'm not even doing it for pride or country, we HAVE the best-trained, best-equipped (and yes, largest Navy.)

I would've even given us the best Air Force, but I'm surrendering that one to the Israeli's.

If we don't have the best Navy, than who does, and try to back it up, sir. For all you know, you could be teaching me something I didn't know.

The British do, we have the second largest navy, we are the leaders in naval warfare technology and research and development for naval warfare technology. We conquered the world using our navy, so we understand naval warfare. We have the best, most avanced type of ship there is.

[DCorp]

If it does ever happen, an intelligent move would be to move up to the Chinese base, and yell "477 J00R B4535 B370NG T0 U5". Right when they say wtf you Americans nuke the shit out of them.

[Zodomizer]

Chinese people can do kamikaze.

lol over 1.313.973.713 dudes live there...

[Bookman60]

There's a good book written by one of aides of the late president Reagan that is extremely well written and insightful. I don't remember the title, but it is a very good book about U.S.-China conflicts and what would happen if war broke out.

[Achilles2]

It'll be like Operation Barbarossa of WWII - Germany (here being the USA) and its allies (here being the UK) is much more powerful but the Soviet Union (here being China) has a lot more troops, and will win overall.

This is, of course, ignoring nuclear weapons. The USA probably would win if it resorted to nuclear warfare. Not if...WHEN because it'll be obvious that in such a war (which will probably be WWIII), a nation will eventually use nukes.

But there's no reason to worry about it. China may emerge as a Superpower, or it may not. Either way, the Chinese economy is largely dependent on the American economy, and vice-versa. I am almost certain that they will not go to war with each other.

[Bookman60]

At 5/24/08 09:46 PM, Zodomizer wrote: Chinese people can do kamikaze.

lol over 1.313.973.713 dudes live there...

That was the Japanese in WWII. Idiot...

[uhnoesanoob]

At 5/24/08 09:38 PM, Epica wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:35 PM, uhnoesanoob wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:31 PM, Stomer wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:29 PM, Jizzlebang wrote:

At 5/24/08 09:21 PM, Stomer wrote: Who would win?

They are both huge, but America's army are incredibly inempt, but America would also get Britain, who are small but incredibly elite. Don't debate this, we all know it's true.

Am I confused because you think China has a more powerful military force than the U.S, or because you think Britain does?

I mean, c'mon.

America is powerful, but your soliders are incredibly retarded and ill trained. That's what you get for having the bulk of your army being southerner redneck hillbillies.

Wow, way to base things off of sterotypes asshole. I am sure your british troops do a great job though... oh wait a tic, the ONE AREA in Iraq that they had to defend turned into a nightmare.....

That's what you hear from your corrupt American press, the Americans are the ones who fuck everything up over there. The British are the ones fighting effectively.

No, idiot, even your own press says so. Basra is the area that the British had to watch, and failed. I actually base my claims on facts instead of misguided sterotypes.

I think your forgetting Britain is smaller than Texas alone, what do you expect us to do, we have a very small amount of active troops compared to you, and you started the whole fucking thing in the first place. We aren't going to do ALL of your dirty work for you.

Well, you can at least do the job you promised to do. If your military is too pathetic to watch over Basra, than you should not be calling the US inept. And you call me brainwashed...