At 6/3/08 08:32 AM, Shaggytheclown17 wrote:
Yes it is since only the upper part of the tower was damaged and the jet fuel was way beyond the ab ility to melt throw all the 4inch thick steel support collms
1) it is not neccessary for steel to be melted for it to collapse.
2) while conspiracists claim that the jet fuel did not melt the steel Loose Change brings forward a point that contradicts their own, and conspiracist claims; supposedly a pool of molten metal was found below the towers weeks after collapse.
what does this mean? for one it goes against the idea that the fire was not hot enough to melt steel. second, it goes against the explosives hypothesis; explosives used to demolish buildings do not melt steel, thats not how they work.
which were alll bent and twisted when the smoke cleared, only explosives meaning the thermite theory having them being planted throughout the building explaining the liquid iron pouring out of the building before it collapsed.
1) thermite is not an explosive. you conspiracists need to make up your minds, did they use explosives or incendiaries?
2) thermite would be extremely ineffecient for demolition:
a) unlike explosives, thermite's energy cannot be directed. couple this with the fact that thermite does not burn sideways (which it would have to if used on a vertical column) it would be near impossible and supremely inefficient to use thermite to bring down the steel structures of a skyscaper.
b) thermite creates lots of slag, but unless they used tonnes of it on a single section of column there is no reason there should be the amount of seemingly molten material seen pouring out the side of the towers.
c) if they did use thermite then the amount that would be necessary to do the required damage to a pillar would be very large, unless they drill holes into the columns. in both casses it would be near impossible to place the material in a short amount of time or without attracting attention.
I'd check up on physics before making such a quick conclusion that your beloved government gives a shit about you n would never send you to die for their own gain without a second glance.
i would check up on the primary uses and behaviours of the materials you claimed were used before making ridiculous stipulations about their implimentation.