Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Translation reads: This is not a pipe

And it is absolutely true

If you think it is a pipe you are on mad crack

Do you understand?

Do you see the reality?

It's a picture of a pipe.

do i win or wut

Is this suppose to be some weird illusion because all I see is a pipe.

It's not a pipe, it's an image of a pipe.

At 5/13/08 12:32 AM, Sabotage wrote: It's not a pipe, it's an image of a pipe.

Indeed!!

Its not a pipe because its a picture

a picture of a pipe is not a pipe,

The message at the bottom makes you say "of course its a pipe"

But it isnt!!

Even if it was a sculpture it still wouldn't be a pipe because we would be looking at an image of it!!!

its some sort of miniature golf club..

At 5/13/08 12:57 AM, Orange-Jews wrote: its some sort of miniature golf club..

Nonono - it's an inverted, carefully painted apostrophe...

At 5/13/08 01:10 AM, Timmy wrote:

At 5/13/08 12:57 AM, Orange-Jews wrote: its some sort of miniature golf club..

Nonono - it's an inverted, carefully painted apostrophe...

Can't you tell that it's a question mark that fell off the ball that it was standing on?

C'est une pipe.

Is it becuase in french, Pipe does not mean the english word of exactly the same letter structure? :P

At 5/13/08 01:13 AM, PigletsMemories wrote: C'est une pipe.

Après moi le déluge.

NO, It is a butt plug

It's a collection of pixels.

At 5/13/08 01:43 AM, DemonicDuo wrote: NO, It is a butt plug

Pity I'm lacking experience in the variety of butt plug shapes, but you could very well be correct.

that's no moon...

And heres my not so big pipe!

Rene Magritte, The Treason of Images 1928

surrealism is pretty nic

art faggots can suck my slimy cock

At 5/13/08 02:16 AM, Giallo wrote: art faggots can suck my slimy cock

Such a quality post.

But that indeed is an image of a pipe. No doubt about it.

At 5/13/08 02:21 AM, Krbyfan1 wrote:

At 5/13/08 02:16 AM, Giallo wrote: art faggots can suck my slimy cock

Such a quality post.

But that indeed is an image of a pipe. No doubt about it.

it's slimy from being in your mother's pussy

At 5/13/08 02:21 AM, Giallo wrote:

At 5/13/08 02:21 AM, Krbyfan1 wrote:

At 5/13/08 02:16 AM, Giallo wrote: art faggots can suck my slimy cock

Such a quality post.

But that indeed is an image of a pipe. No doubt about it.

it's slimy from being in your mother's pussy

I see someone needs a pile driver. Come here to Uncle Haggar!

Night all, have fun debating on the existance of this pipe.

At 5/13/08 02:25 AM, Krbyfan1 wrote: I see someone needs a pile driver. Come here to Uncle Haggar!

Night all, have fun debating on the existance of this pipe.

i raped your sister

It's not an image of a pipe. It's the brain's interpretation of the optical signals sent from the eye depicting a visualisation upon which the supposed "image" sits within, which matches one of the literary definitions of the word "pipe".

At 5/13/08 12:30 AM, Rallard wrote: It's a picture of a pipe.

No, it's not.

At 5/13/08 01:50 AM, Shawn wrote: And heres my not so big pipe!

Yup, a big pipe.

At 5/13/08 02:43 AM, WritersBlock wrote: It's not an image of a pipe. It's the brain's interpretation of the optical signals sent from the eye depicting a visualisation upon which the supposed "image" sits within, which matches one of the literary definitions of the word "pipe".

1. If you really want to get technical... which it seems you do... the visualiZation is an image itself projected onto the retina. The "image" on the webpage is a discernably separate element, not because it is "sitting within" a stage, not because it is actually separate, but because it provides a general pictoral pattern that we've been conditioned to associate as an item itself.

2. We can also associate this 'image' with verbal (not literary) definitions.

It's a Rorschach Inkblot Test.

At 5/13/08 02:57 AM, ReciprocalAnalogy wrote:

:1. If you really want to get technical... which it seems you do... the visualiZation is an image itself projected onto the retina. The "image" on the webpage is a discernably separate element, not because it is "sitting within" a stage, not because it is actually separate, but because it provides a general pictoral pattern that we've been conditioned to associate as an item itself.

:2. We can also associate this 'image' with verbal (not literary) definitions.

Touche

sigh. I have no humerous picture to post here.

At 5/13/08 12:30 AM, Rallard wrote: It's a picture of a pipe.

Not even that. It's a decoded translation of ones and zeros through a photography alogorithm projected through, currently, my laptop screen, showing a cropped and recreated image of The Treachery of Images by Magritte.

How does that sound? :p