Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/7/08 07:27 PM, Phaze91 wrote: Tasers, dogs, pepperspray not enough?

They have an even larger range of stuff.

At 5/7/08 07:25 PM, Brick-top wrote: Actually, there are countries where the police go without firearms....lets see....oh that's right, mine doesn't. British police do not carry guns, however using the logic of almost everyone in this thread the UK should be a crime infested shit hole....well even more than it is now lol

I was assuming you meant in the US. The UK is a lot different in this regard, so that would make sense. Still, I strongly support the arming of any type of enforcement. It just makes sense.

At 5/7/08 06:59 PM, Brick-top wrote: Do you think that police should carry firearms or should they put more research into non-leathal weaponary?

well duh

At 5/7/08 07:03 PM, Goonie wrote:

I wounder you asked this question to yourself, should Mods carry a ban button? irony......

Actually, a ban button is roughly equivalent to a taser, an account delete button is equivalent to a gun . . .

At 5/7/08 07:01 PM, Sanch wrote: Should bears carry fur?

No, they should wear it.

But, I do believe that cops need lethal weapons, in certain situations.

cops need to put down ther guns so i can kick there asses

At 5/7/08 07:34 PM, Sanch wrote: I was assuming you meant in the US. The UK is a lot different in this regard, so that would make sense. Still, I strongly support the arming of any type of enforcement. It just makes sense.

How so?

At 5/7/08 08:49 PM, Brick-top wrote:

At 5/7/08 07:34 PM, Sanch wrote: I was assuming you meant in the US. The UK is a lot different in this regard, so that would make sense. Still, I strongly support the arming of any type of enforcement. It just makes sense.

How so?

You're joking, right?

At 5/7/08 06:59 PM, Brick-top wrote: Do you think that police should carry firearms or should they put more research into non-leathal weaponary?

Police should only carry guns in highly dangerous gun crime areas.
If every copper in Britain carried a gun. They would pull it out every time a piss head started giving them grief.
Britain has enjoyed a fairly low level murder and gun crime rate compared to other countries. Since the introduction of modern policing, which in Britain have never carried guns.

They should have armed response (Which they probably do) within miniutes of any urban area.

They should be armed with weapons matching the or slightly exceeding the weapons civilians can get (Americans have accses to guns American cops should be armed).

At 5/7/08 07:01 PM, FullFistMaria wrote: I think they should do both.

I agree,they should put some research,and meanwhile,they should have guns.
Maybe atleast 1 should have a gun in each group just incase though...that is if the
non-lethal weapons are invented.

They should look into that paralyzing thing the dude had in iron man.

Don't fuck with the dude.

I figure there should be no need for police, oh well, too late.

Not very affective to try and taze a guy when they have a pistol.
Besides, I plan to be a cop, so I would like a gun thank you.

At 5/7/08 11:45 PM, Cericon wrote: Not very affective to try and taze a guy when they have a pistol.
Besides, I plan to be a cop, so I would like a gun thank you.

Yeah same here i wouldnt mind joining the police force sure having non-lethal weapons great!
Put we are in an Age where Crooks can have a Fully-automatic SMG the size of a Pistol.
Overall Yeah i would like to fuck some body up with a bigger gun ...

NO, COPS SHOULD NOT CARRY WEAPONS OF ANY SORT

At 5/7/08 06:59 PM, Brick-top wrote: Do you think that police should carry firearms or should they put more research into non-lethal weaponry?

Best to do both actually, unless you wanna kill to end the crime!

At 5/7/08 06:59 PM, Brick-top wrote: Do you think that police should carry firearms or should they put more research into non-leathal weaponary?

Some police officers do some crime fighting with their firearms and some police officers are doing their job on the observatory to do research about footprints or something.

At 5/7/08 07:02 PM, Brick-top wrote:

At 5/7/08 07:01 PM, Sanch wrote: Should bears carry fur?

They WEAR fur, it's technically true that they carry it but that's like saying you carry your colon. It's a stupid statement.

YOUR DICK CARRIES YOUR COLON!!! THERE!!! I FUCKING SETTLED IT ONCE AND FOR ALL!!! AHH!!!

At 5/7/08 07:03 PM, B-aSt-Ar-d wrote: Until criminals stop carrying guns, yes, they should.

Criminals also mail people anthrax and blow up buildings. Should the police mail suspected criminals anthrax and blow up their houses?

Hell yeah they should ... If they're having to deal with people that have guns they should be equally prepared.

At 5/7/08 07:02 PM, Brick-top wrote:

At 5/7/08 07:01 PM, Sanch wrote: Should bears carry fur?

They WEAR fur, it's technically true that they carry it but that's like saying you carry your colon. It's a stupid statement.

And you wear skin?

Your an idiot as well.
They have fur
You have skin
You have a colon

You have probably had a penis touch that colon.