Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/4/08 01:48 AM, 0gg-the-Gnome wrote: Wall of Text hits you for 9,924 (crushing)

Ok, I'm not sure where exactly that first wall of text came from... but what I meant by that second paragraph was that furries did not come out demanding acceptance, as you implied in your previous post.

I simply can't understand why people need to be such bitches about things that don't concern them. Which was what I was trying to say in my original post.

At 5/4/08 01:34 AM, Keebalicious wrote:

And uhhh... you drew first blood, not us.

:D RAMBO! I LOVE RAMBO AND "FIRST BLOOD".

This thread is now about Rambo and everything that makes him awesome. I totally finished the novel earlier today.

Oh holy crap lets argue about things that really don't need to be argued about. I like chocolate ice cream! Challenge my opinion, CHALLENGE MY TASTES! DO IT MOTHERFUCKER! DO IT!

At 5/4/08 02:02 AM, Hedwick wrote: Oh holy crap lets argue about things that really don't need to be argued about. I like chocolate ice cream! Challenge my opinion, CHALLENGE MY TASTES! DO IT MOTHERFUCKER! DO IT!

Chocolate icecream is sick and depraved and must be destroyed, only strawberry icecream must be tolerated. No exceptions.

At 5/4/08 12:57 AM, Reaperssythe wrote:

At 5/4/08 12:51 AM, Hedwick wrote: I am on neutral ground. Furry porn isn't bad sometimes, if i feel like it.

it's not all about porn

That's why I hate you people.
Imaginary bestiality should never be allowed to become culture.

At 5/4/08 12:50 AM, Darkstrategy wrote: Having something with fur and that's supposed to portray an animal directly with some human characteristics in a cartoon versus a real-life model who wears a bunny tail or some fake ears. You can't compare the two dude. They're completely different psychological appeals. Furry people have an infatuation with the thought that an animal can be humanized, including sexually.

It's all about psychological appeal, and i doubt very many draw the same conclusions about the two examples you named.

Agreed.

I don't care how much of my post was quotes.
I don't care how much of my post was quotes.
I don't care how much of my post was quotes.
I don't care how much of my post was quotes.

ITT: idiotic babble.

At 5/4/08 12:50 AM, Darkstrategy wrote:

At 5/4/08 12:47 AM, Funkybob2 wrote: Man, what is it with me and wierd thoughts today?

Anyway, I'd like to start this off by saying that I'm not a furry. I was just thinking, when I came to realize something: People shouldn't critcize furries, because in my eyes, the Playboy bunny girls/sexy bunny or kitten outfits could easily be considered as furry, and you've probably pleasured yourself to those two things.

Discuss please. Any rebutals?

Having something with fur and that's supposed to portray an animal directly with some human characteristics in a cartoon versus a real-life model who wears a bunny tail or some fake ears. You can't compare the two dude. They're completely different psychological appeals. Furry people have an infatuation with the thought that an animal can be humanized, including sexually.

It's all about psychological appeal, and i doubt very many draw the same conclusions about the two examples you named.

Unforuntly for you dude your wrong I do cosplaying at anime cos play conventions and I mostly go where as a furry I even had gone to furry conventions too, but I have found nothing different from the two, so after seeing artwork, games, movies, and hanging around furries I found a lot, I'm now a furry my self and as any other fur fan I don't consider it fetish, religion, race, or whatever you might of mistaken it to be, but I'm human I have a g/f, a job, and a apartment of own, but I still look up furry artwork (AND THERE NOT ALL SEXUAL).

At 5/4/08 12:52 AM, RosaParks wrote:

At 5/4/08 12:47 AM, Funkybob2 wrote: because in my eyes, the Playboy bunny girls/sexy bunny or kitten outfits could easily be considered as furry, and you've probably pleasured yourself to those two things.

Well, in my eyes.
You're a faggot.

you belong on the back of the bus
shuttup.

i had to

anyway
i asked a question a WHILE back about if furries liked beasiality
and it was a mix and i found out a LOT about furries
im not one but its like
dude
people like w/e they like
just leave it be
people all have fetishes and others will think are weird
while still others dont care
while still others agree on

just
DEAL.

TF > Furry

For the last god damn time.

Furries should like go to an uncharted island and make their own country.
Which we'll promptly nuke.

We don't go up into random people's face's and scream out, "furry hater". We just don't need the haters now bothering us just because we found something that just caught our interest. If the haters succeed in destroying the furry population what wouls stop the haters from destroying whatever the Hell else they have a hate crime against?

Yeah. If you don't fuck real animals, you have no right.

Furries is just plain weird looking.

There's a massive difference between a woman wearing bunny ears and a picture of a cartoon fox having sex. I'm not for or against furries; they honestly don't concern me. It's just wrong to compare the two things.

I only criticize those who destroy all the sacred memories off my childhood (Sonic, Looney Toons, and other anthromorphic characters)

At 5/4/08 12:52 AM, RosaParks wrote:

At 5/4/08 12:47 AM, Funkybob2 wrote: because in my eyes, the Playboy bunny girls/sexy bunny or kitten outfits could easily be considered as furry, and you've probably pleasured yourself to those two things.

Well, in my eyes.
You're a faggot.

now, now, lets remined our selfs what faggot means. it means gay or homosexual, and i hes "pleasured" himself to the play boy bunnys hes probably not a fag, maby ur just a fag tryin to hide it by calin others fags

At 6/10/08 08:47 PM, HotActionYiffFur wrote: I think people should stop pretending.

That's not goin dude furries are the same as anyone else nobody wants to be themselves, there is always a time and place where people don't want to be themselves.

attn DARK35000:
your butthurt reply to this month-old thread only makes matters worse. sure i'm a fur but i no longer make an attempt to argue with the ignorant and/or feed the trolls. you're yelling at a brick wall that obviously has no ears so STFU and think before you open your mouth!

At 6/10/08 11:51 PM, rednec0 wrote: attn DARK35000:
your butthurt reply to this month-old thread only makes matters worse. sure i'm a fur but i no longer make an attempt to argue with the ignorant and/or feed the trolls. you're yelling at a brick wall that obviously has no ears so STFU and think before you open your mouth!

For your info I didn't know so instead of insulting me and driving the spike through me you could of said something else.

i like porn, furries create porn ergo i like furries

At 6/11/08 12:14 AM, gruz wrote: i like porn, furries create porn ergo i like furries.

no the furries didn't create porn it was actully some random lonly guy with nothing else but his right hand and Bayer. Furries actually created a new type of art alongside of anime. The fur fandom is just part of the anime interest nothing more or less different, the porn were all just knock off ideas off of regular human just after anime hentai of course. And arguments are human nature.

Lol no.

Furries like to think that the the thing they are wanking over has REAL fur on them, not a bunny swimsuit with a little bunny tail and fake bunny ears. They like to think that it's all real.

I just ruined TF2 for Newgrounds. :3

Oh look, another thread about us....

we feel so loved.

At 6/11/08 12:40 AM, Gagsy wrote: Lol no.

Furries like to think that the the thing they are wanking over has REAL fur on them, not a bunny swimsuit with a little bunny tail and fake bunny ears. They like to think that it's all real.

I'm a furry and don't think that's real nor do the other furries I conversate with, most furries know the difference between reality and cartoons it doesn't make us more or less of anything. The furries I hang out with are more interested in style and artwork rather then going far with the our imaginations.

At 6/11/08 12:59 AM, DARK35000 wrote: I'm a furry and don't think that's real nor do the other furries I conversate with, most furries know the difference between reality and cartoons it doesn't make us more or less of anything. The furries I hang out with are more interested in style and artwork rather then going far with the our imaginations.

No I mean, you guys imagine that it's real fur on a furry creature, I'm just talking in terms of comparing it to a playboy bunny. We all know furry isn't a real thing, but when you guys think about furry sexually, it's thinking about something that has fur on it.

Meh, furries just creep me out. Sorry if that offends the furry fan base, but it does. I just really can't see what's sexy about it. Anthropomorphic characters are cool, but not sexy. Not to me anyway.

Furry porn is hawt.

At 5/4/08 11:00 AM, 0gg-the-Gnome wrote:

At 5/4/08 02:02 AM, Hedwick wrote: Oh holy crap lets argue about things that really don't need to be argued about. I like chocolate ice cream! Challenge my opinion, CHALLENGE MY TASTES! DO IT MOTHERFUCKER! DO IT!

Chocolate icecream is sick and depraved and must be destroyed, only strawberry icecream must be tolerated. No exceptions.

Agreed, but Strawberry and Vanilla are the best.