Top savers

[AtomicTerrorist]

Im pretty sure i should be at # 49 in the top 50 savers...

so why the hell am i not there :'(

[1337]

The list isnt updated, it hasnt been since the redesign i believe, just look at the profiles you marked with an arrow, they have allot more then 18k now.

[aldlv]

because that list is not updated... for about half a year... maybe more..

why don't you look here?
http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/6713 0/63

[Little-Rena]

It's a little broken it would seem but this topic shows the top 100 so you can look on that where you place, the recent update there is on page 63 I belive.

But yeah, the main one should get fixed sometime, lol.

[AtomicTerrorist]

allright thanks alot guys

[zimzap]

The most obvious way that you can tell it is broken is by looking at the levels. It shows the top level people to be in the 30s or so I believe.

[gfoxcook]

At 3/30/08 10:17 AM, AtomicTerrorist wrote: Im pretty sure i should be at # 49 in the top 50 savers...

so why the hell am i not there :'(

Egad... this was bound to happen. Thanks, non-updating "auto"-update rankings lists on teh official NG stat section!

:::waits for the "OMG, I SHOULD BE #49 IN THE TOP 50 BLAMMERS LIST" topic to be made:::

What's really funny is that the September 2007ish last "auto"-update of that official top 50 save list shows Toocool with 63,000 or so saves... and he's like 10,000 higher now. Of course, anyone just concentrating on the bottom part of the top 50 isn't going to notice how far off the #1 spot's actual save count is from reality, so.... yeah.

If we had saverank and blamrank in our profiles, this would all be moot, because AtomicTerrorist would have looked in his profile to see if it said #49... and it would say something like #75 and he'd be all "oh.... nevermind." And wouldn't have even made this topic.

OH WELLS.

[gfoxcook]

At 4/1/08 06:57 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 3/30/08 10:17 AM, AtomicTerrorist wrote: Im pretty sure i should be at # 49 in the top 50 savers...

(snip)

If we had saverank and blamrank in our profiles, this would all be moot, because AtomicTerrorist would have looked in his profile to see if it said #49... and it would say something like #75 and he'd be all "oh.... nevermind." And wouldn't have even made this topic.

060) 18,284 || + 0,109 || AtomicTerrorist -2

Whoops. Make that "something like #60" instead. Still... you're losing your spot, man. If you raelly do care about getting into (and remaining in) the top 50 saviors, ya best turn on the save engines and push the throttle TO TEH MAX!

[Dream-of-Duke]

At 3/30/08 10:17 AM, AtomicTerrorist wrote: Im pretty sure i should be at # 49 in the top 50 savers...

so why the hell am i not there :'(

God knows how long they have not updated.
To enter the top 50, YOU MUST DEFEAT ME.

[Coop83]

At 4/1/08 10:39 PM, Dream-of-Duke wrote: God knows how long they have not updated.
To enter the top 50, YOU MUST DEFEAT ME.

I'm on it :P

Gap's down to around 300 Saves now, so it shouldn't take me all that long to get there ;)

[gfoxcook]

At 4/1/08 10:39 PM, Dream-of-Duke wrote:

At 3/30/08 10:17 AM, AtomicTerrorist wrote: Im pretty sure i should be at # 49 in the top 50 savers...

so why the hell am i not there :'(

God knows how long they have not updated.
To enter the top 50, YOU MUST DEFEAT ME.

No, not "god knows." Anyone knows.

It hasn't updated since around Labor Day in September 2007. One day, the top 50 exp, top 50 blams, and top 50 saves just spontaneously updated (it was the first time we could access the saves and blams lists, actually... and the first update to the exp list since it first updated on 7/17/2007 after the redesign)....

And then boom, the very next day... no update. And so it goes, to this very day. If any admin has ever commented on this super-non-functional part of the site, which used to function quite well between 2002 and 2007... I'm not aware of it.