At 3/24/08 11:39 PM, ijustowndU wrote:
At 3/24/08 10:12 PM, yinyang101 wrote:
At 3/24/08 10:08 PM, SniperWolf1564 wrote:
At 3/24/08 10:05 PM, yinyang101 wrote:
Walls lol
Who are you replying to?
Also, use paragraphs.
i was replying to the only guy who understood what i was saying. probably because me and him are the only two souls in the world who were tricked into playing AoM(no, i just kid, thousands of players bought AoM in its debut year)
You have terrible taste in games. Age of Mythology was an excellent addition to the RTS genre. It had strategy, Great graphics for any RTS at the time, one of the most compelling stories I have ever seen for that king of game.
What didn't you like about it?
PS. use the reply button
The problem for me was that, by the time i heard of it and actually got it, i had already played games that had expanded off the idea....it was one of the RTS styles up points, but there were ones from earlier on that i couldve put on here, AoM happened to be the worst(at the time) real-time strategy i had played....but like i said, it was spoiled by the fact that i played more advanced games before it. if i had gotten it when it came out, AoM mightve been in my top...alas for delays in buying and technology lapses....My one real problem was that i didnt really get into the story, it was kind of distant to me. but the game play was definately good.