At 3/19/08 04:30 PM, MindChamber wrote:
this is gonna come off as a jab, but whatever it isnt meant to. It seems to me Pox was looking more for technically proficiently than creativity.
Yes I judged mostly on technical prowess and how it resembled a cover for the actual magazine.
Though to be fair none of them were overly more/less original compared to the others. If creativity was going to be a factor, I don't think the results ( I chose at least ) would have been terribly different.
And of course each has weak and strong points, it will be a cold day in hell when someone makes a perfect piece of art :p
At 3/19/08 04:43 PM, LiftYourSkinnyFists wrote:
Yeaeeaash. I didn't spend more then about 3 hours on mine. Whatever though it was still fun doing it. but i have to admit i still think my piece is one of the better ones. still shouldn't have slacked on it though.
Well the reason I didn't rank it higher was that your style sort of doesn't suit the "hot chick" think that much since she looks like a corpse or something, which is creepy.
I love your style, in the abstract it would definitely be in the top 10 but in the contest of making something teenagers would jerk off to, I dunno :p