Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

as far as U go U can suk my dik mtherfuker

Why do atheists always seem like they are having a bad day.

At 3/7/08 04:18 PM, JackPhantasm wrote: Why do atheists always seem like they are having a bad day.

They don't necessarily. I often seem upbeat.

At 3/6/08 07:20 PM, Proteas wrote: And although he mentions that God is not neccesary from a scientific standpoint, he does go on in several other essays to make mention and therefore acknowledge his presence.

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stephen_Haw king

1. Don't use Wiki

2. Scientiest of that proportion say they're religious because they don't want to be underminded by religious idiots like you.

At 3/6/08 07:56 PM, Spartan517 wrote:

At 3/6/08 07:26 PM, reviewer-general wrote: A-T-H-I-E-S-T

That is all.

;

Damn, you took what I was going to say.

T-Y-P-O hope you get the meaning. See, when you don't give a fuck about what people say since its a fact. you often do it fast, SINCE ITS A FACT AND IT DOESN'T HAVE SOME ALTERNATE SHIT ASS ANSWER!

At 3/7/08 07:08 PM, DeathAura wrote: 2. Scientiest of that proportion say they're religious because they don't want to be underminded by religious idiots like you.

Through a lack of grammar and spelling not to mention punctuation, you have displayed your obviously superior atheist mind.

At 3/7/08 08:56 AM, mythicaljake wrote:

At 3/6/08 06:59 PM, DeathAura wrote: comments or question anyone?

Well, you discovered Stephen Hawking and the Big Bang theory.... Well done.
Catch up, buddy

My friend, Stephen said nothing of the big bang, he made his own scientific belief. He thinks there is no beggining to the universe, so he differse from the big bang, he has almost the same concept, just a bit more logical.

At 3/7/08 07:11 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote:

At 3/7/08 07:08 PM, DeathAura wrote: 2. Scientiest of that proportion say they're religious because they don't want to be underminded by religious idiots like you.

Through a lack of grammar and spelling not to mention punctuation, you have displayed your obviously superior atheist mind.

Don't see were you're going with punctiation, but i may of had 1 or 2 typos. Not the end of the world body. This isn't state of the union, this is a thread on some website that has flash videos. Keep that in mind the next time you troll, ok?

At 3/7/08 07:17 PM, DeathAura wrote: Don't see were you're going with punctiation, but i may of had 1 or 2 typos. Not the end of the world body. This isn't state of the union, this is a thread on some website that has flash videos. Keep that in mind the next time you troll, ok?

I'm not trolling.
Merely pointing out flaws in your sentance structure.

Although you still fail to make a rebuttal to my actual point. However, I think instead of read it (if it indeed presents itsself), I'll go to bed.

I would recommend you to give up for your sake and come back later ( which is never ).

At 3/7/08 07:08 PM, DeathAura wrote:

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stephen_Haw king

1. Don't use Wiki

2. Scientiest of that proportion say they're religious because they don't want to be underminded by religious idiots like you.

Except for the fact that the quotes he listed from Wiki ARE sourced.

At 3/7/08 07:08 PM, DeathAura wrote:

2. Scientiest of that proportion say they're religious because they don't want to be underminded by religious idiots like you.

What you saying that scientist can't be religious, if you are you are wrong.

Gnostic is not the proper antonym of agnostic, btw.

Gnostic is a beleif that spirituality and enlightenment can be achieved by attaining knowledge, Agnostic states that god cannot be scientifically proven or disprove.

follow the guy who talks thru a keyboard.

I'm already an atheist, so no.

Well OBVIOUSLY the most intelligent person is an atheist, no truly intelligent person is a theist.

At 3/7/08 02:24 AM, Memorize wrote: I think the word you're looking for is Deist.

Saying "God is not necessary" is not deism.

And yet he's also quoted as saying that evolution has a direction.

Can you give me the specific quote instead of a vague statement about something that he might have said at some point?

At 3/7/08 10:05 AM, JackPhantasm wrote: Lol since when were agnostics considered atheists, Elfer?

I guess I'm not agnostic then...

Ever since "atheism" meant "not theism" rather than "anti-theism"

i.e. always.

At 3/7/08 08:39 PM, Elfer wrote:

Saying "God is not necessary" is not deism.

Saying you believe in some sort of a God, is.

Can you give me the specific quote instead of a vague statement about something that he might have said at some point?

Can you give me something other than YOUR own personal interpretation?

At 3/7/08 08:25 PM, MARINO wrote: I'm already an atheist, so no.

Well OBVIOUSLY the most intelligent person is an atheist, no truly intelligent person is a theist.

The ignorance just drips off of that statement.

At 3/7/08 09:18 PM, Memorize wrote:

At 3/7/08 08:39 PM, Elfer wrote:

Saying "God is not necessary" is not deism.

Saying you believe in some sort of a God, is.

He didn't say that. He said that god wasn't necessary. I don't see what the problem is here.

Can you give me something other than YOUR own personal interpretation?

...obviously I can't?

At 3/7/08 09:33 PM, Nylo wrote:
The ignorance just drips off of that statement.

If you paid attention to all the Christians on the internet who make similar claims about atheists, you'd be drowning.

At 3/7/08 08:15 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: Gnostic is not the proper antonym of agnostic, btw.

Gnostic is a beleif that spirituality and enlightenment can be achieved by attaining knowledge, Agnostic states that god cannot be scientifically proven or disprove.

your actually quoting an ancient philosophy- a rather ancient one. you're partially right though- Gnostics followed that logic- but the word gnostic was originally intended as the antonym of agnostic- the people who followed the philosophy just gave it the name- just like protestants aren't people who protest (even though they did when they made the name). if you say "i am a protestant" no-one will take that and assume you mean "i protest" even though the word is most of the name.

Wow. I'm kinda amazed some people actually took the bait. For the love of God........this topic was created by an idiot thirteen year old with an inferiority complex the size of Texas.

Truly, whether one believes in a god or not isn't going to make you more intelligent or not. Einstein wasn't an atheist.

At 3/8/08 03:07 AM, Tancrisism wrote: Truly, whether one believes in a god or not isn't going to make you more intelligent or not. Einstein wasn't an atheist.

That's right--
I hate how people on both sides will say, "Oh, well... Mr. Genius is Atheist/Not Atheist." It doesn't have any baring to what they've discovered or what they teach.

Darwin was a Christian, although not in that stupid Evangelical sense that you absolutely need to believe every single letter of the Bible-- Perhaps a lapsed Christian, a questioning Christian, a person who indeed have beliefs but so happened to discover something that contracted a certain Biblical passage. But his personal beliefs doesn't have any baring on what he observed and recorded.

I think people feel that beliefs have to match the scheme of the world. That's why people make up stupid rumors such as Lady Hope witnessing Darwin's renouncement of his findings.

Just because Einstein believed in God doesn't mean that he expressly believed that God created the world.

Just because Hawkin may possibly be an atheist doesn't mean it disproves the existence of god.

Neither one did work to prove or disprove anything... it's just their personal beliefs and it should be left where they belong. ALONE.

At 3/7/08 11:40 PM, SadisticMonkey wrote: If you paid attention to all the Christians on the internet who make similar claims about atheists, you'd be drowning.

And the opposite is true and more evident on NG.

If you paid attention to all the Athiest on the internet who make similar claims about Christians, you'd be drowning.

At 3/8/08 06:58 AM, fli wrote:

At 3/8/08 03:07 AM, Tancrisism wrote:

Darwin was a Christian

Well yeah, so was I, but people get smarter as they grow.

At 3/7/08 07:25 PM, Centurion-Ryan wrote:

At 3/7/08 07:17 PM, DeathAura wrote: Don't see were you're going with punctiation, but i may of had 1 or 2 typos. Not the end of the world body. This isn't state of the union, this is a thread on some website that has flash videos. Keep that in mind the next time you troll, ok?

I'm not trolling.
Merely pointing out flaws in your sentance structure.

Although you still fail to make a rebuttal to my actual point. However, I think instead of read it (if it indeed presents itsself), I'll go to bed.

you realize there's a diffrence from flaw and typo, this is Newgrounds once again sir, this isn't state if the union. Arguing on the internet is like the special olympics. Even if you win, your still retarded. I just felt like making a point. Just please stop tying to deny the fact that the smartest person is atheist, once again, Its a fact. Grow some balls please. We aren't here to "point out flaw" in eachothers sentancing. I made the thread, once again, for the 3rd time, to point out the fact that the smartest person is atheist. There's no rebuttal, its a fact my friend. All that you can do now is point out flaws in my sentancing because you can't accept the fact. I've met many people like you on Newgrounds, and I'm just about sick of it. Too many retarded republicans praising some gay religion which probably does not have a real logical answer to anything.

At 3/8/08 06:58 AM, fli wrote:

At 3/8/08 03:07 AM, Tancrisism wrote: Truly, whether one believes in a god or not isn't going to make you more intelligent or not. Einstein wasn't an atheist.

That's right--
I hate how people on both sides will say, "Oh, well... Mr. Genius is Atheist/Not Atheist." It doesn't have any baring to what they've discovered or what they teach.

Darwin was a Christian, although not in that stupid Evangelical sense that you absolutely need to believe every single letter of the Bible-- Perhaps a lapsed Christian, a questioning Christian, a person who indeed have beliefs but so happened to discover something that contracted a certain Biblical passage. But his personal beliefs doesn't have any baring on what he observed and recorded.

I think people feel that beliefs have to match the scheme of the world. That's why people make up stupid rumors such as Lady Hope witnessing Darwin's renouncement of his findings.

Just because Einstein believed in God doesn't mean that he expressly believed that God created the world.

Just because Hawkin may possibly be an atheist doesn't mean it disproves the existence of god.

Neither one did work to prove or disprove anything... it's just their personal beliefs and it should be left where they belong. ALONE.

Well apparently so, since Einstien had theories about how the universe started, meaning that he did not belive everything a gay bible say, thus meaning he was atheist. He just didn't feel like being discriminated by you religious numbnuts. So if these people are Atheist, doesn't that show you something at all? Or are you just not going to accept the fact like everyone else is?

At 3/8/08 10:00 AM, DeathAura wrote: Well apparently so, since Einstien had theories about how the universe started, meaning that he did not belive everything a gay bible say, thus meaning he was atheist.

Just because someone doesn't believe everything in the bible dosen't make them atheist.