The Enchanted Cave 2
Delve into a strange cave with a seemingly endless supply of treasure, strategically choos
4.39 / 5.00 38,635 ViewsGhostbusters B.I.P.
COMPLETE edition of the interactive "choose next panel" comic
4.09 / 5.00 15,161 Views1.Linkin Park
2.SOAD
3.A7X
4.Atreyu
5.KoRn
6.3 Days Grace
7.My Chemical Romance
8.AFI
9.Slipknot
10.Bad Religion
Marlboro reds suck, menthols are my choice, bic lighters are the shit, and kush makes me rejoice.
IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE THOSE BANDS ARE TERRIBLE.
I can honestly say that every single one of those bands is just godawful.
You've totally fooled me, I have no ideal you're an alt. You're so sly and subtle.
Eww. It's all over where the "10 greatest new rock bands" should be.
I love clever sigs.
THIS IS NOT ONE.
prob all those bands suck but system
oh well, I'm bored anyways, I don't really give a crap.....just passing some time really...
Marlboro reds suck, menthols are my choice, bic lighters are the shit, and kush makes me rejoice.
The only good one would be the Red Hot Chili Peppers.
If you could even call them modern.
4/10 were emo bands.
</emophobic>
My signature was old so I changed it.
At 2/26/08 08:44 PM, Bus-Driver wrote: You've totally fooled me, I have no ideal you're an alt. You're so sly and subtle.
I do stuff like that and I am not an alt :'(
All the cool kids have signature text
fucking atreyu sucks cuz they are owned by disney
At 2/26/08 08:43 PM, FlashCridic1124 wrote: 1.Linkin Park
2.SOAD
3.A7X
4.Atreyu
5.KoRn
6.3 Days Grace
7.My Chemical Romance
8.AFI
9.Slipknot
10.Bad Religion
KoRn isn't newer and LP has been around a while too. Ask what years and stuff.
I do stuff like that and I am not an alt :'(
You're not?
I thought you was.
At 2/26/08 08:47 PM, Toasty4you wrote: The only good one would be the Red Hot Chili Peppers.
If you could even call them modern.
They aren't on the list, but they should be number 1.
I'm depressed now. You called those bands Rock.
You just befouled Rock's good name.
Damn I love pissing people off :D
Marlboro reds suck, menthols are my choice, bic lighters are the shit, and kush makes me rejoice.
At 2/26/08 08:43 PM, AngryBanana wrote: IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE THOSE BANDS ARE TERRIBLE.
you are terrible shut the fuck up if you dont like that bands
hey i would like to add some groups like the devil wears PRADA and mest
oh and sum 41
and maybe good charlotte
Uruguay(L)
FB= Te Kv El Gian
msn = enzoygian@hotmail.com
At 2/26/08 08:59 PM, VenusDoom wrote:At 2/26/08 08:43 PM, FlashCridic1124 wrote: 1.Linkin ParkKoRn isn't newer and LP has been around a while too. Ask what years and stuff.
2.SOAD
3.A7X
4.Atreyu
5.KoRn
6.3 Days Grace
7.My Chemical Romance
8.AFI
9.Slipknot
10.Bad Religion
oh and i forgot he is right this arent new bands some of them have more than 2 years i i think that bad religion got like 10 years old that why i say old groups in my other post
Uruguay(L)
FB= Te Kv El Gian
msn = enzoygian@hotmail.com
At 2/26/08 08:43 PM, FlashCridic1124 wrote: 1.Linkin Park
troll
2.SOAD
troll
3.A7X
troll
4.Atreyu
troll
5.KoRn
troll
6.3 Days Grace
who?
7.My Chemical Romance
troll
8.AFI
not new
9.Slipknot
troll
10.Bad Religion
not new
To tell you the truth, I see 80's and below as classic rock, 90's and above as new rock, thats a little messed up but what the hell
Marlboro reds suck, menthols are my choice, bic lighters are the shit, and kush makes me rejoice.
At 2/26/08 10:04 PM, FlashCridic1124 wrote: To tell you the truth, I see 80's and below as classic rock, 90's and above as new rock, thats a little messed up but what the hell
90's and 80's aren't old enough to be considered 'classic'.
At 2/26/08 10:26 PM, the-amazing-joe wrote:At 2/26/08 10:04 PM, FlashCridic1124 wrote: To tell you the truth, I see 80's and below as classic rock, 90's and above as new rock, thats a little messed up but what the hell90's and 80's aren't old enough to be considered 'classic'.
I didn't say 90's was classic, and I guess 80's is just rock then I guess, thats just what my opinion was so yeah...
Marlboro reds suck, menthols are my choice, bic lighters are the shit, and kush makes me rejoice.
At 2/26/08 10:26 PM, the-amazing-joe wrote:At 2/26/08 10:04 PM, FlashCridic1124 wrote: To tell you the truth, I see 80's and below as classic rock, 90's and above as new rock, thats a little messed up but what the hell90's and 80's aren't old enough to be considered 'classic'.
anything before 85 can
but i have no idea what 86-05 can be considered
At 2/26/08 09:18 PM, gianpa4 wrote:At 2/26/08 08:43 PM, AngryBanana wrote: IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE THOSE BANDS ARE TERRIBLE.you are terrible shut the fuck up if you dont like that bands
Nice comeback.
You must be in your schools debate team.
At 2/26/08 10:30 PM, AngryBanana wrote:At 2/26/08 09:18 PM, gianpa4 wrote:Nice comeback.At 2/26/08 08:43 PM, AngryBanana wrote: IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE THOSE BANDS ARE TERRIBLE.you are terrible shut the fuck up if you dont like that bands
You must be in your schools debate team.
No, the captain of the debate team
At 2/26/08 08:45 PM, Lagatag wrote: QotSA
/ thread
Muse
/reopen thread
At 2/26/08 10:38 PM, BananaBreadMuffin wrote:At 2/26/08 08:45 PM, Lagatag wrote: QotSAMuse
/ thread
/reopen thread
Airbourne
</reending thread>
all those bands are absolutely awful
The newgrounds secrets
A Fourm Post Should Be Like A Skirt, Long Enough To Cover The Subject, But Short Enough To Keep Things Interesting.