At 2/23/08 05:08 PM, Dry-Ice wrote:
At 2/23/08 04:47 PM, Jackotrades wrote:
If performed correctly, there is no need for great animation as long as a laugh is made.
What you're attempting to shove down our throats is a painful redundant opinion which states that we're not allowed to bash any type of movie because it can be done well, and you're asking us to enjoy something even though it may be shitty.
Overall, fuck you.
I am not asking you to change your opinion, hell, I fucking hate it when people ask me to change mine.
What I am saying is that just because you dont like the humor of a particular flash DOESNT MAKE IT BAD.
What makes it bad is if it plain out is random, means Nothing, doesnt get a laugh at all, and was a complete waste of time.
I can tell that you seemed somewhat informed on other types of flashes, tell you what, go ahead, zero every flash you dont think is funny, see what I care. sure, maybe it doesnt fit your style of humor. LETS ALL BLAME THE ANIMATOR, its the animators fault for not trying to put some of what you think is funny in the flash. IT IS HIS FAULT THAT YOU DIDNT LIKE HIS HUMOR.
I figure that it can be one of three ways:
- you dont like that kind of humor and graphics, so you zero it.
- you hate all "non-waterlollie" flashes, so the artist got unlucky that you reviewed it (new adjective there).
- you are having your period.
Next time you criticize me, try to be at least unbiased you fucking prick.