At 2/10/08 09:30 AM, Xavon wrote:
Saying I leave at "I just know" kind of makes it seem a little worse than it is. It's not that I just know, I have my basis, but as I said I can't fully describe the process I go through when judging people.
Not to sound sappy but, would it be fair to compare this to love? Solely in the sense that: Love is not intangible, not completely. Only the core emotion is the piece that can't be put to words. With that usually comes a host of very tangible things. I'd say that these tangible things are what we eventually use to rationalize that we are in love or love someone. Without (considering) the pieces that follow or precede the core emotion, I think we'd be very confused as to what the hell is going on inside.
I suppose I can't be fully psychotic while I admit I would rather go after and torture people who deserve it though, but I wouldn't be limited to just "bad" individuals, branching into innocence seems like a possibility..
The innocent have the capacity to be just as enviable or despicable as the bad. So I wouldn't say you'd necesarily have to 'branch out' in order to consider the innocent in the same pot as the bad. You however, seem to make a distinction (or atleast made). It seems to me we may have found a 'tangible' little chunk of that elusive criteria.
The next set of questions would be: What qualifies as innocent? What separates the innocent from the bad? Why are the bad more disposable than the innocent?
Yes, I have tried to make an effort at explaining what I feel through words. Just because I've done that though, doesn't mean I still understand it as well or that I even got half of the message that I wanted out. My justification is quite possibly an impulse, but as I said, it's different in my mind. I've tried to translate what I'm feeling in order to get an answer, because I really don't know.
I think you've convinced me that my signature quote needs a third condition: sensation.
We are creatuse of motivation, through sensation, for justification. The saying's potency I think comes from it being in chronological order. I find the last step to be the most misleading, the second to be the most confusing, and the first to be the most mechanical. Or: least honest, least clear, least "human".
As of now, sensation is getting the most attention, with alittle justification on the side. I think, if you explored justification further, you'd have enough material between the two latter steps, to successfully explore the former. And I think once you've got a clear handle on the former, you'll have a better understanding of the latter two.
Maybe I really don't feel like this, maybe it's just random bursts of hormones
If you reach into a box and feel spaghetti, but it turns out to be jello... you still felt spaghetti. You feel how you feel. What comes of or causes the feeling can change said feeling over time. What you felt still stands.
or maybe I really would go through with all of this someday if I were pushed to the edge. [. . .] there's no way for even me to tell while I'm stuck in this state of confusion.
Even the most wonderful of people probably have the capacity to do 'terrible' things when pushed to the edge.
Perhaps you are able to analyze this situation better than I am.
I highly doubt that. You're in a much better position I think to analyze than I am. For the most part I'm just providing a loose methodology.