At 12/10/12 03:55 PM, Fifty-50 wrote:
At 12/10/12 03:46 PM, Flowers10 wrote:
I have posted this before.That's eerily similar, quite impossible unless you use a filter. Or is it a paint over? Aren't paint overs a universally accepted practice? She also mentioned something about holding her painting to dispel the suspicions. Is it really good evidence I wonder? It's also possible that she just printed them out.
but do you really think someone would go that far to support such a valueless lie? I mean I too have my doubts, the work seems too artificial, there's no way a human could achieve that without adding a feeling of organic style, but is the effort of lying worth the nearly non-existent spoils?
trying to comprehend motive in this is rather bamboozling.