Does anyone else feel that the reviewing system here just doesn't work the way it should in theory? The final word is always said by the artist and that means other people who look at the review will see the conflict as the artist being the victor.
Party A says, I think the rendition of this piece could use a little more work. I believe more time should be focused on the major details such as: shape, proportion, anatomy, and perspective rather than the small details such as clothing and decorations. My main reason for saying this is that it seems like you're trying adamantly to mask the fact that you're not properly educated in the field of art.Just try harder next.
Party B says one of the following: K/ sure/ whatever/ I have no idea what you're talking about/ I'm trying at least/ It's my style/ Well let's see your art/
I know in retrospect a dickish response would lead people with half a brain cell to think again of checking back, but the the point remains that comments in the form of a single sentence are annoying and doesn't do justice to people who do review. I'm guilty of doing it myself, but that's the current system. Wouldn't it be cool to have a word minimum of at least 50 to submit a review?