Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Also just starting to mess around with overlay. You'd think after having photoshop for several years now that I would've figured that out a while back, but whatevs.
Since I got new photoshop (used to have elements 2.0) i've been inspired to explore. and i also discovered layer styles.
i jizzed at "stroke" (no pun intended. at first.) it's really convenient.

Okay.
Call 1-800-295-0051. This is the nestle chocolate hotline. After they present you with language options, say nothing for about ten seconds. After you finish laughing at that, press 4. After hearing all the options and laughing some more, press 7.
I guarantee this is worth looking into

haha bubble wrap and a noogie

So that's sort of like a prank call ,Seems like it.

You can't prank a machine flea

A ma... chine?
They must do some delivery and no take out.

Its the nestle chocolate helpline flea, keyword helpline. They don't deliver bars of chocolate to your door

At 3/26/10 03:38 PM, The-Worsley-Bear wrote:

A ma... chine?
They must do some delivery and no take out.

Its the nestle chocolate helpline flea, keyword helpline. They don't deliver bars of chocolate to your door

just ignore flea, hes gone senile, hes the crazy old man of the forum now

Streamin

Heyall!

Its gone largely unnoticed (750 views); but the Morgan FFF Collab has been released.
The Morgan FFF collab was (one of) the first art collab to result from the new Collaboration Forum; It has art from your fellow art forumers: Altrian, Hyptosis, Renaenae, TheCupCakeArmy and Moi.
SO CHECK IT OUT!

• 
  Morgan FFF Collab by ImpendingRiot

  Click to view.

  Type

  Movie

  Rated

  Ages 13+

At 3/27/10 07:18 AM, J-qb wrote: Heyall!

art from your fellow art forumers: Altrian, Hyptosis, Renaenae, TheCupCakeArmy and Moi.

Wow, I've only heard of two of those artists, but I'll probably check it out.

At 3/27/10 09:39 AM, gmanthesandwhichking wrote:

At 3/27/10 07:18 AM, J-qb wrote: Heyall!

art from your fellow art forumers: Altrian, Hyptosis, Renaenae, TheCupCakeArmy and Moi.

Wow, I've only heard of two of those artists, but I'll probably check it out.

gman, get around more, the art forum is a vast place and youve only explored a fraction of it

At 3/27/10 09:39 AM, gmanthesandwhichking wrote:

At 3/27/10 07:18 AM, J-qb wrote:

art from your fellow art forumers: Altrian, Hyptosis, Renaenae, TheCupCakeArmy and Moi.
Wow, I've only heard of two of those artists, but I'll probably check it out.

Well, I've heard of all of them except for this Moi person *wink*

they don't seem to have done much, lol

At 3/27/10 09:23 PM, CloudEater wrote: Well, I've heard of all of them except for this Moi person *wink*

they don't seem to have done much, lol

that actually made me lol, well done cloudy

At 3/27/10 10:13 AM, Ashman wrote:

gman, get around more, the art forum is a vast place and youve only explored a fraction of it

True, true. I should probably also spend more time in the art portal.

forum has been somewhat lively today.....

At 3/29/10 03:54 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote: Haven't posted this here, and I think it's somewhat relevant:

Holy shit.. That is hillarious..

The Photoshop 'content aware fill'.

Going through the comments I can see that a lot people are freaking out about this and saying that theyll be 'out of the job'.To be honest Im not worried because Im aiming for a better design job than just photoshopping out unwanted scenery all day.

At 3/29/10 07:47 AM, FullFistMaria wrote: The Photoshop 'content aware fill'.

Going through the comments I can see that a lot people are freaking out about this and saying that theyll be 'out of the job'.To be honest Im not worried because Im aiming for a better design job than just photoshopping out unwanted scenery all day.

That is pretty amazing. I just can't wrap my head around how the program knows how to make that last panorama picture look so good..

At 3/29/10 07:58 AM, Lundsfryd wrote: That is pretty amazing. I just can't wrap my head around how the program knows how to make that last panorama picture look so good..

Yeah its pretty impressive.I checked to see if it was april fools day after watching a bit of it.

At 3/29/10 08:11 AM, FullFistMaria wrote:

At 3/29/10 07:58 AM, Lundsfryd wrote: That is pretty amazing. I just can't wrap my head around how the program knows how to make that last panorama picture look so good..

Yeah its pretty impressive.I checked to see if it was april fools day after watching a bit of it.

Me too.. It just seems impossible. How does it know! It's a bit scary really :P

thats crazy, i'd love to see what kind of effect this content aware has on drawings and art

Content Aware Fill

That's a neat trick. But doesn't it bug anyone else that it's fine and dandy to print manipulated photos in the first place without some kind of disclaimer? Why is it peoples jobs to edit photos for commercial consumption? Seriously, are we so fragile that anything less than a perfect photograph will shatter our conceptions of reality? Boo! I want reality not some fakey bullshit world! >=[

/rant

At 3/29/10 11:11 AM, BlackmarketKraig wrote: Content Aware Fill

That's a neat trick. But doesn't it bug anyone else that it's fine and dandy to print manipulated photos in the first place without some kind of disclaimer? Why is it peoples jobs to edit photos for commercial consumption? Seriously, are we so fragile that anything less than a perfect photograph will shatter our conceptions of reality? Boo! I want reality not some fakey bullshit world! >=[

/rant

I'm wondering how well it would work with handdrawn material. like more 'cartoony' graphics or 'painterly' graphics.

I think it's cool too but it will mostly be used for advertising. But still, i'm interested in how it copes with more handdrawn stuff. That would make people EXTREMELY lazy. ie. drawing a ton of detail and then basically filling that calculated, random detail into another area (waves, fish, trees, etc). Then it would look like you drew all those details when really you didn't.

I can't wait to test it out but i do agree. with photographs it can really alter one's view. With handdrawn artwork it could make people lazy. I still want to try it out to see what it can do though.

At 3/29/10 03:54 AM, TurkeyOnAStick wrote: Haven't posted this here, and I think it's somewhat relevant:

Thats the funny as hell, oh how we laughed.

At 3/29/10 01:50 PM, ornery wrote: Well a lot of artists who you respect for their supreme amount of detail you will find have lazy ways around it. Take Escher for example. All those badass tessellations and crazy perspective pieces with a million objects receding in space he has... yeah those are prints. This means that he would take a plate or stone or whatever, do the detail in a tiny section of it, then just stamp the rest of the page with it to fill the space.

Ah wow, didn't know that. Lots of detail takes time and it's wonderful when someone can get the lighting and focus correct across a large piece of scenery or texture. I realize detail can only go so far and by that point it's just how much time is willing to be put into it, maybe not necessarily skill, but there are fair amounts of both. I'm just thinking about paintings, cityscapes, landscapes, etc. If you painted only a few buildings in detail and then had photoshop randomly fill in other ones along a path, that would just be fas;dkfj;sdjf!!

AND ON THE SUBJECT OF PHOTOSHOP STUFF
I came across this balls to the wall retarded tutorial.
White Tattoo, Black Hand

hmm could you find a tan native american hand with a blue tattoo instead? i'm not very interested in white on black...