Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

I usually don't like to waste my time with this type of things, but I was wondering through the internet, and I came around this little internet doodad called "The Candidate Calculator". It is basically an internet poll. You answer a small list of questions with yes, no, unsure and then you rate your answer with High, Medium, or Low importance. Takes 5 minutes at the most.

At the end, it calculates which candidate best fits your views.

My Top candidate was a tie(so this is not very accurate): Ohio Representative Dennis Kucinich(D) and Former Alaska Senator Mike Gravel(D) with 87.10% match.

I think this is slightly fun and amusing. Try it and post your results.

I seem to have gotten Duncan Hunter at around 84%.

Hillary Clinton?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!!? 78% But she's the one that I don't want to win!

Strange... I got Mitt Romney, who is my actual candidate of choice, with 85%, but the closest candidate after him was a noname with 14%.

The Results are funny, aren't they?

At 1/11/08 09:00 PM, hongkongexpress wrote: Hillary Clinton?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!!? 78% But she's the one that I don't want to win!

You may hate her as a person, but [and how the HELL did they compile hillaries opinions on the issues exactly... i thought she didn't have any] But you might also agree with her on certain issues.

What did you get Smilez? I'm curious.

At 1/11/08 10:02 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote:
You may hate her as a person, but [and how the HELL did they compile hillaries opinions on the issues exactly... i thought she didn't have any] But you might also agree with her on certain issues.

Well that makes perfect sense. She's ambiguous enough to appeal to a wide majority.

I got Ron Paul (75.44%)
Kucinich in second with 71.93%.

Hucabee in 4th with 53%.

Hmm... never even heard of BIden, but appearently he is the person most aligned with my political views with 64.54%.

At 1/12/08 04:27 AM, CommanderX1125 wrote: Hmm... never even heard of BIden, but appearently he is the person most aligned with my political views with 64.54%.

I don't know shit about him.

But you win the award for being the lowest % thus far.
Dunno if anyone else caught this, but being a low percent is actually a good thing (I think). It means you're most centered in ideals and opinions, and not staunchly leaning towards a certain political outlook.

That's what I'm inferring from that anyways. I dunno if that's the actual case, let alone if anyone else bothered thinking about it.....

I've taken one like this before and it came out similarly:

Mike Gravel at 79.55%. Followed closely by Richardson and Biden.

My candidate of choice, Obama, only scored 56%.

My second choice, McCain, scored 48.8%

Hmmm.... maybe it's because I put a medium/low emphasis on many of the things everyone seems all worked up about and a high one on things others seem kinda blase' about this year?

Kucinich 88.33 apparently

Ron Paul at 74.07%...

At 1/12/08 07:00 AM, emmytee wrote: Kucinich 88.33 apparently

BWAHA, hop on the the Shagg-Mobile!

Seems accurate enough...
Ron Paul with 85%

If you say no to everything and leave the importance at medium, you get Ron Paul with 83%.

So the main idea here is, "Ron Paul says no to everything."

At 1/11/08 08:52 PM, Memorize wrote: I seem to have gotten Duncan Hunter at around 84%.

Terribly disapointing he doesn't have a chance. He would make an AMAZING president.

93.22% for Thompson
next inline is Gravel with 14.44
interesting.

Mike Gravel. Don't know who that is, but apparently we see eye to eye.

Next in line is Dennis Kucinich who I do know.

87.43% for the candidate I want to win.

Fred Thompson.

At 1/12/08 10:19 PM, Christopherr wrote: If you say no to everything and leave the importance at medium, you get Ron Paul with 83%.

So the main idea here is, "Ron Paul says no to everything."

LMFAO. Yeah, internet polls aren't the smartest.

At 1/11/08 09:07 PM, Christopherr wrote: Strange... I got Mitt Romney, who is my actual candidate of choice, with 85%, but the closest candidate after him was a noname with 14%.

Well think to yourself. Do you dislike her simply because, "she's Hillary" or do you actually know and dislike her policies?

At 1/12/08 10:19 PM, Christopherr wrote: If you say no to everything and leave the importance at medium, you get Ron Paul with 83%.

So the main idea here is, "Ron Paul says no to everything."

I tried to the same thing with yes ended up with guilaini with 75%

At 1/13/08 12:10 AM, therealsylvos wrote: 93.22% for Thompson
next inline is Gravel with 14.44
interesting.

HA! I knew something was stange. Myself, like chris, were looking at the wrong part.
My real second place was brownback(whom I wanted to go all the way) followed by tancredo and Romney. I was looking at the everyones percentages.

Dennis Kucinich - 77.46%

It's almost time for another political compass thread isn't it?

Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.62

72.41% match to Rudy Guiliani.

Economic L/R: 0.12
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -1.74

Sadly...I couldn't get NG to upload my JPG...

At 1/13/08 10:29 AM, TheMason wrote: Economic L/R: 0.12
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -1.74
Sadly...I couldn't get NG to upload my JPG...

It was a .png when you downloaded it. Open it in paint and click file>Save As, then change the filetype to JPEG.

Here's mine:

At 1/13/08 01:59 AM, Black487 wrote:

At 1/11/08 09:07 PM, Christopherr wrote: Strange... I got Mitt Romney, who is my actual candidate of choice, with 85%, but the closest candidate after him was a noname with 14%.

Well think to yourself. Do you dislike her simply because, "she's Hillary" or do you actually know and dislike her policies?

What? Both of the people I mentioned were men... Hillary was below 5% on mine, I think.

Kucinich closely followed by Mike Gravel, whoever the fuck that is.

Then Hilary Clinton, John Edwards and Barrack Obama.

Bottom was...someone I can't remember and 2nd bottom Mitt Romney.