Be a Supporter!

blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling

  • 417 Views
  • 9 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
redzone
redzone
  • Member since: Nov. 3, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:00:29 Reply

Now many say that blu-ray will be the winner since it is better. But being better isn't how it works.

Take the beta max and the vhs that was the standard.

Nowbeta max actually had better quality. It was better then the competition. Why didn't it become the standard? Because those who had the vhs said that the vhs could store more hours on it then the beta max. What they didn't say was that because it could store more, it would have less quality because it is stretched out.

It all goes down to which product are more people interested in.

If you were selling a mega big hi-def screen tv and another was selling a junk tv, and there was someone comming to buy the rights to one of the tvs, and more people were going for the junk tv, which one would he choose?

would he choose yours because it is better looking? no. he would choose the one that is getting more money.

What ever sells more is the winner, regardless of quality.

With the product, the quality isn't always how they catch customers, they also have a sales pitch too that gets people's attention.

So which one will win the "format war" as some call it for stupid reasons? Don't know. Blu-ray has better quality, but that means nothing. If blu-ray is getting better sales, then blu-ray will come on top, but the market can always swing to the other way in a heart beat.

Also, blu-ray and hd-dvd. I dont see the difference. There is some difference, but you have to be a real nit picky kind of person to actually care about them.

ZekeySpaceyLizard
ZekeySpaceyLizard
  • Member since: Aug. 23, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 25
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:01:03 Reply

They're both too expensive for what little they offer. Fuck em both.

redzone
redzone
  • Member since: Nov. 3, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:02:08 Reply

At 12/23/07 01:01 AM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: They're both too expensive for what little they offer. Fuck em both.

In time the price will go down. Remember how expencive dvds when they first came out?

ZekeySpaceyLizard
ZekeySpaceyLizard
  • Member since: Aug. 23, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 25
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:04:22 Reply

At 12/23/07 01:02 AM, redzone wrote:
At 12/23/07 01:01 AM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: They're both too expensive for what little they offer. Fuck em both.
In time the price will go down. Remember how expencive dvds when they first came out?

True. But CD's and DVD's were a revolution in technology. The death of standardized film.

Blueray and HD are, at their basics, DVD's with sharper picture quality. For an extra 800 bucks. Goody.

redzone
redzone
  • Member since: Nov. 3, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:16:32 Reply

At 12/23/07 01:04 AM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: True. But CD's and DVD's were a revolution in technology. The death of standardized film.

Blueray and HD are, at their basics, DVD's with sharper picture quality. For an extra 800 bucks. Goody.

Still, in time the price will go down. And I agree that it isn't much of a step foward. Just an upgrade then a totally new format.

It's for better quality with the hd-tv's, which will be the standard tv in maybe 5-7 years.

Kuro
Kuro
  • Member since: Feb. 6, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 22
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:21:16 Reply

DVDs look fine to me.

I don't particularly want the images on my TV to look better than life itself.


Kuro - Puting the 'Kur' back in 'inkurable disease.'

BBS Signature
verycoolguy
verycoolguy
  • Member since: Jun. 6, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 23
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:36:37 Reply

I think high-def shouldn't really be of the norm, but an option for those who can afford it. DVDs should still sell.
Anyway, Blu-Ray seems better to me though, it has more movies than Hd-Dvd.

Carbonwater
Carbonwater
  • Member since: Feb. 3, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 30
Animator
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:37:37 Reply

VHS for life.

BlueFlameSkulls
BlueFlameSkulls
  • Member since: Nov. 15, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 28
Blank Slate
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 01:48:10 Reply

At 12/23/07 01:04 AM, ZekeySpaceyLizard wrote: True. But CD's and DVD's were a revolution in technology. The death of standardized film.

Blueray and HD are, at their basics, DVD's with sharper picture quality. For an extra 800 bucks. Goody.

I tried looking for something other than better definition for both formats earlier and there is literally nothing.

All there is, is ONLINE FEATURES. Instead of putting those features on the discs you have to go online.

Plus I looked at a few box sets and the discs are separate. Instead of Spiderman 1-3 being on one disc where on blu ray you can get 50GB of storage it's on 3 discs. So naturally yes, it is a higher definition DVD with nothing to offer.

EKublai
EKublai
  • Member since: Dec. 13, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Animator
Response to blu-ray or hd-dvd...no telling 2007-12-23 02:48:45 Reply

At 12/23/07 01:36 AM, verycoolguy wrote: I think high-def shouldn't really be of the norm, but an option for those who can afford it.

Don't you think that's a little... selfish?

DVDs should still sell.

Anyway, Blu-Ray seems better to me though, it has more movies than Hd-Dvd.

Yeah Blu-ray is definitely going to win out now since the choices are narrowed and most of the stuff on hd dvd is available on blu-ray and not vice versa.


BBS Signature