At 12/12/07 07:59 PM, Cpl-Sylux wrote:
*fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap*
That's enough, let's not make this thread any more spammy than it already is.
Couple of points: There's nothing wrong with artistic nudes and there is a difference between nudes and pornography. Pornography is, by definition, meant to sexually arouse. Art can arouse but is mainly here to show the artists personal vision, erotic or not.
The initial image is kind of borderline, kind of hard to tell because the art is not well done, but it looks like what a 14 year old might find erotic... but it could be interpreted in another way, and it isn't really X-rated so I think it's alright.
Yes, NSFW threads should be labeled NSFW. But the word "naked" in the title gives us that impression anyway. In the future I might not be so lenient.
The only real reason that this might get locked it that the immaturity in this thread is rather high. If we could see some work that had a bit of effort in it, and maybe have a little bit of discussion on the art that's posted rather than twittering like a bunch of horny adolescents we could have a halfway decent thread.