onEnterframe= function(){

[I-smel]

Hey, I've started using onEnterFrame = function(){ about as much as I'm using onClipEvent(enterFrame){

Is one of them faster than the other?

[Jindo]

One of them is used for scripting on the time-line (onEnterFrame), the other is used for scripting on objects (MovieClips).

I don't know if one or the other is faster.

[sandypaw]

same speed,when it enters the frame. Use onEnterFrame = function() though, because maintimeline script is much better.

For speed, use intervals.

[GustTheASGuy]

Why would that make execution any diffirent? The only diffirence is its entry point, it doesn't change anything.

It is better, however, to use the 'onEnterFrame' property as having your program stretched out makes it harder to access things so it's more disorganised and unviewable.

[PyroflameProductions]

On the Frame is faster... Because when I put this code on a movieclip...

_root.button.levelamount = Math.round((_root.button.levelamount)*1)

I can see the number as 232.214 before it goes to 232. But if I put that code on the same frame I NEVER see 232.214 before the 232, it's instant a instant 232 on the timeline unlike the "lag" if it were to be on a movieclip. My Fps even is at 30.

[zenyara]

At 12/10/07 02:24 AM, PyroflameProductions wrote: On the Frame is faster... Because when I put this code on a movieclip...

_root.button.levelamount = Math.round((_root.button.levelamount)*1)

I can see the number as 232.214 before it goes to 232. But if I put that code on the same frame I NEVER see 232.214 before the 232, it's instant a instant 232 on the timeline unlike the "lag" if it were to be on a movieclip. My Fps even is at 30.

Interesting observation. I am forced to put all the events on a movie clip inside one of my games due to the fact I'm using the main timeline for frame reference and I don't want to have to recode every single frame action...