Be a Supporter!

Net Authority

  • 479 Views
  • 8 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
KeithHybrid
KeithHybrid
  • Member since: May. 2, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 03
Blank Slate
Net Authority 2007-11-30 17:38:02 Reply

http://www.netauthority.org/

This is basically a group of people who go around marking sites that they don't like as dangerous to children and thus must be purged from the internet.

I personally think they're full of crap for two reasons:

1. They have this listed in their "Acceptable Use Policy":

God did not intend for different species or races to intermingle sexually.

I'm fairly certain that if God didn't intend for people of different races to intermingle, He would've made it so a half-black half-Japanese kid was impossible to concieve.

2. They have Nintendo listed as a "violator". By my count, that constitutes instant failure.


When all else fails, blame the casuals!

BBS Signature
Lindione
Lindione
  • Member since: Nov. 21, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 08
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-11-30 17:45:50 Reply

At 11/30/07 05:38 PM, KeithHybrid wrote: 2. They have Nintendo listed as a "violator". By my count, that constitutes instant failure.

I am currently rolling on the floor luaghing while I'm typing this. I looked at it and most of these sites do not make sense and in the whole interracial thing is immoral in my opinion. What if children read that and thought that their God dosen't want them. Newgrounds is on there for everything i think.


"Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of man, that state is obsolete."

Don't bother using the bible as an argument.

LordJaric
LordJaric
  • Member since: Apr. 11, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 16
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-11-30 17:51:34 Reply

I would love to see how they are going to get rid of these so called "offensive" sites.

lol

Common sense isn't so common anymore
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants"
Fanfiction Page

Proteas
Proteas
  • Member since: Nov. 3, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 30
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-11-30 18:20:36 Reply

At 11/30/07 05:51 PM, LordJaric wrote: I would love to see how they are going to get rid of these so called "offensive" sites.

They couldn't enforce any of their ratings even if they wanted to, it's a joke website, just like The Landover Baptists.


BBS Signature
KeithHybrid
KeithHybrid
  • Member since: May. 2, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 03
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-11-30 18:24:22 Reply

At 11/30/07 06:20 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/30/07 05:51 PM, LordJaric wrote: I would love to see how they are going to get rid of these so called "offensive" sites.
They couldn't enforce any of their ratings even if they wanted to, it's a joke website, just like The Landover Baptists.

It is? It's a very well constructed hoax, I most admit. Aside from the almost rediculous sites they have listed as offenders, they were very convincing.


When all else fails, blame the casuals!

BBS Signature
Proteas
Proteas
  • Member since: Nov. 3, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 30
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-11-30 19:04:36 Reply

At 11/30/07 06:24 PM, KeithHybrid wrote: It is?

Yes.


BBS Signature
Kyothine
Kyothine
  • Member since: May. 21, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 23
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-12-01 07:48:30 Reply

FYI, it's a joke site.


BBS Signature
Kyothine
Kyothine
  • Member since: May. 21, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 23
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-12-01 07:49:52 Reply

At 12/1/07 07:48 AM, Kyothine wrote: FYI, it's a joke site.

whoops, looks like I'm a tad bit late there.


BBS Signature
JerkClock
JerkClock
  • Member since: May. 6, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 36
Blank Slate
Response to Net Authority 2007-12-01 09:00:41 Reply

At 11/30/07 07:04 PM, Proteas wrote:
At 11/30/07 06:24 PM, KeithHybrid wrote: It is?
Yes.

I don't have a hard time believing that, but en.dumbfuckipedia.org isn't something I would call proof.

Nonetheless, I do agree.