At 1/4/08 05:24 PM, InGenius wrote:
You're either two pages late or paraphrasing my "Objective/Subjective" post. Regardless of which is the case, nobody here seems to understand those two words.
I made my introduction on page two. Your's was page three, but I still agree with anything you brought up later. I'm willing to have a civilized discussion about the issue with anyone smart enough to defend it.
I sure as hell have the skill to prove it and definitely have the praise of others.
While this assumes two arguments; you do have ego, it is still ego based on recognition, and you require others to ensure it.
My music is what defines me. I control every aspect of it.
This is the egotist's premise, it looks great on paper, but then it all goes wrong when you put it before other people to judge, and consider it a leading factor in your creation.
And in you words, define baseless.
In my words? Well I agree with what the dictionary defines it as.
In this context, the genre you make music in and why it's being made, comes into question. The reason any evidence you provide outside NG doesn't count, is because it's not relevant, because it's not on NG.
What is relevant, are creations on NG that can defend it's own merit, which is why when I ask you for a defense, the only true defense you can give me, is subjectivity and the names of other artists. This isn't a proper defense. Hence, it is baseless.
(Let us ignore the attacks, the posts that are so blatantly subjective that they are not important to anyone) You, nor Reven, nor anyone else is able to defend the genre by rational means, providing not just musical or emotional evidence, but philosophical evidence.
The only thing I'm able to comprehend from this, is that you make music you either like, or it correlates "to your RL". Which is even more horrendous, because it is like the artist writing his own biography, and calling his experiences art. Yeah, that's what happned to the writer James Frey.
Poetic-Reven made this thread in a very one-way manner, perhaps rationality was cock blocked from him from all the subjective jackasses, but that goes to show how much effort he was able to actually defend his own work, he was able to deduct that people weren't rational, but only that, not able to defend himself.