Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

i'd have to say blizzard. even though in your first post you make MMOs seem like what blizzard is famous for. it really isn't though.

they made the legendary starcraft, which set the pace for ever RTS game to come. they later reinvented it with WC3, with amazing graphics, heroes, map editor, and countless other things that made both games amazing.

also, the revolutioinized RPGs. almost every good hack-and-slach/RPG game ever made since Diablo game out, has been modeled after it. and then diablo 2 just raised the bar, by improving every flaw the first has.

blizzard is the god of video game companies

holy shit page five.

you people should fucking die in a fire.

In my opinion, Blizzard and Bungie's game development styles are very similar.

Blizzard tends to revolutionize gaming, but also sticks to a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" development habit. Bungie does the same.

But both add new features into the game that spices up the game, and turns it into something revolutionary.

But I'd say that Blizzard's games are more longer-lasting and more fun than Bungie's.

People are still playing 10 year old Starcraft, and 5 year old Warcraft 3, and still obsessed about WoW (even though I hate WoW)

Bungie has also created grand games, but they are FPS's, and FPS's usually live for a few years, than die.

Like Halo 2, which was replaced by Halo 3 (which is a much better game)

They are both my favorite game developers, other than DICE and Infinity Ward.

Blizzard made The Lost Vikings. Win.

pwnt bitch

At 11/22/07 09:56 PM, homor wrote: this is like compareing apples to wood.

I SAY ITS THE DUCK!

At 11/28/07 11:15 PM, 1337biatch wrote: pwnt bitch

that post was worth as much as this topic.

SHIT THAT SHOULD BE DELETED.

At 11/25/07 10:29 PM, Protosscat123 wrote: Starcraft ftw? sc was the best sci-fi strategy game in history, and halo is the best shooter. so who gives a fluck? they're both equally great. and WOW is blizzard's downfall.

I'd hardly consider a game that nets them over $100 million a month a "downfall."

There is better than the two of them; however, I pick Blizzard because of Bungie doing little beyond Halo games, and those games being FPS.

i fucking hate you all so damn much.\

this thread ia now unofficlely locked, none of you are allowed to post after this.

Both wank companies tbh...

I like Bungie, but Blizzard own them for experience.

Seriously, World of Warcraft is bloody huge and earning billions, they also have Starcraft and loads of other series'...

Bungie has Halo. It takes more than Halo to top Blizzard.

Bungie or Blizzard, why don't you just make me choose between eating glass or setting myself on fire?

marathon FTW.

2k for the win.

yeah Diablo was huge too WOW is overrated but still blizzard wins.

If u put halo 3 it wins though HAH!

In terms of money, Blizzard, they have 10,000,000+ players. Each player pays equivalently £8 every month, that's about £80,000,000, or $160,000,000 a month...

Plus buying the game, buying the expansions, etc...

But on the other hand...

Bungie is payed by Microsoft to make Halo, and Microsoft is the (second) richest company in the world (losing to some Mexican guy...).

Very unsurprisingly, I'll have to go for Bungie because they have Halo :p

Well its simple Maths...

Blizzard > Bungie but then the inequality sets in so it goes like this

Tim Tebow > Blizzard > Crap > Bungie.

blizzard may have more games but halo rules...

To the person who said EA games: EA games is the most evil corrupted sign of hatred that ruins everything. Look what happened to Westwood. Unless you were probably just joking and then its cool =)

I like them both equally, but if you add Firefly into the mix...

Im a Stronghold lover, what can I say?

Probably Blizzard. I kinda hate halo.

Also, this thread was created the day I signed up, awesoem!

Blizzard has had such a larger impact on gaming than Bungie, it's not even questionable.

Blizzard is far superior.

Bungie didn't revolutionize anything, they just added needed features that should be in most FPS games.

call of duty 4 is better than the utter shite that is halo

blizzard, they also do fallout and diablo 3

Blizzard
All of there games are amazing.
Versus 1 maybe 2 decent games from Bungie.

At 11/22/07 09:53 PM, Ragnarocks245 wrote: Heres a cage match between my two favourite video game companies. Which one do you think is better?

Bungie = FPS, Halo series, revolutionary Xbox game, Marathon revolution FPS, 360 champion, best FPS in the world, beutiful graphics, one of the most awaited games in history (Halo 3),

FPS = yes.
halo series = yes
revolutionary xbox game = it's a good shooter, there's nothing revolutionary about something we've seen in dozens of game earlier.
marathon = it's not revolutionary.
360 champion = nope.
best fps in the world = hell fucking no.
beautiful graphics = so what? i've seen better on the 360.
one of the most overrated games eva = fuck yes.

by slapping on ''revolutionary'' on every bungie title won't make it a better game, you just slap it on because you know the list will look pathetically short towards the blizzard list if you don't.

i'm going with blizzard, diablo, WoW rts series, not a big fan of the MMORPG myself though.